User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405   > >>
1. September 2005, 19:00:09
Expired 
Subject: Re:
Princess Alison: I really wonder why nobody's heart ever goes to those 1000+ poor people of Iraq who have recently died in missle attacks and other explosions and also because of lack of food.

1. September 2005, 18:48:44
Adaptable Ali 
I would just like to say, and i am sure my thoughts are echoed, here, in the UK, our thoughts are with all American people during this very difficult and traumatic time.

1. September 2005, 17:04:06
alexlee 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF:
Please list any members that you know of that are missing on that board, maybe someone else has heard from them or has a way of contacting family that would know!

1. September 2005, 16:16:02
coan.net 
I was just looking, and notice that Fencer made a new board: Missing people - This is a temporary board to post information about the members who are missing since the hurricane Katrina which hit hard several states in the USA

I usually try not to post information on multiple boards, but I thought many people would be interested in this board.

31. August 2005, 20:27:28
harley 
OK thats enough please. About brains and all off topic subjects. General chat is only a click away!

31. August 2005, 20:26:20
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
Tuesday: But i just looked on your page, and u havent got any

31. August 2005, 19:44:51
lukulus 
Subject: Re:
Jason: I know, but I will prolong it next year:)

31. August 2005, 19:34:01
Jason 
you cant refer anyone now only at the time of creating membership

31. August 2005, 19:32:37
lukulus 
BK was recomende to me by someone on IYT with nick "thissitesux" so I dont know how person I have refer:)

31. August 2005, 19:26:06
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
wellywales: By the looks of things they arent many people on here that does have brains............

31. August 2005, 19:11:28
WellyWales 
Subject: Re:
lukulus: I have just checked Fencer, he has no brains, who is doing all the work

31. August 2005, 18:59:05
lukulus 
Subject: Re:
ZOMBIE: GIMME YOUR BRAIN

31. August 2005, 18:30:35
Artful Dodger 
Subject: Re:
Princess Alison: check out my profile...I have no brains either...but I still manage to win a few game ;)

31. August 2005, 16:24:31
Adaptable Ali 
Fencer. Any chance of getting some new smiley's the ones we have now are getting old hat

31. August 2005, 15:50:42
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: If u get extra income from the google link , does that mean u can give me my brains back

31. August 2005, 15:18:01
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Red dots, green dots

31. August 2005, 15:09:39
ClayNashvilleTN 
I saw the question one other time but not the answer

What do the little dots next to games we are playing on our game list and what do they mean?

31. August 2005, 13:07:39
wierd 
Subject: doh
sorry, wrong board, the description of this board mentioned features.

31. August 2005, 13:03:58
wierd 
Subject: Random Color
Is it possible we could get a feature that would let each players color be chosen randomly once the game starts? I really hate having to choose wether im white or black, I'd like it to randomly pick for me at game start.

31. August 2005, 11:52:29
Expired 
Subject: Re:
lukulus: *
3**3
*

31. August 2005, 10:03:33
lukulus 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: So we now know why is Fencer so bussy - he is clicking on google banner

31. August 2005, 09:36:50
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: So what? I have nothing against people trying other game sites as well. It doesn't matter if they find an URL here or elsewhere. But if they click on the ad here, I can get some extra income from Google.

31. August 2005, 09:34:37
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Google Ads
plaintiger: Google Ads works by reading the page that will contain the ads and deciding which are the key words. It then hauls out one of a selection of ads based on those words. I don't believe participants in the scheme have much control over what Google chooses though it would make sense, as you point out, not to have competitors advertised.

31. August 2005, 09:21:41
plaintiger 
um...new question: why are there Google ads for other gaming sites ("Play Backgammon with Us!") out on the login page? isn't that a bit self-defeating? wouldn't Filip rather people came and played backgammon *here*?

31. August 2005, 09:03:56
plaintiger 
Subject: Re:
volant: excellent - that's just as i hoped. thank you!

31. August 2005, 05:40:04
Pioneer54 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
It is kind of amazing that this referral program has generated such heated debate!? It's an imperfect system, that doesn't seem to be in doubt. But in the blink of an eye, Filip could just as easily scrap the whole thing, and we'd all have "no brains"! Not that he'd want to necessarily, he has his own reasons for it being there, but he could do away with it.

For example, over two years ago, when I was a pawn, I referred a player who immediately became a Rook, and that player referred several other players of a specific game type who also became Rooks, but I got nothing. I later became a Knight, then a Rook, then back to a Pawn, then a Knight, but there was no retroactive payment for my referral; just the way it goes.

There seems to be about five times as many Rooks as Knights, so it is obviously the optimum choice for those who do pay (or get a membership via grant). However, this is common knowledge, so retroactive rewards do not seem in order, but that is Filip's domain, so I'll say nothing more.... I'd become a Rook again, except that with over 50 games going, I cannot devote enough attention to each and play as sharply as I'd like, although this may not be of concern to many other players that just to have a lot of games going. The main drawback of the Knight membership is having to wait for other players to finish their games before another tournament of that type can be entered, but by trying new games I have adjusted to that somewhat; also, I look for events with shorter time limits.

After experiencing many different internet games sites over the past several years, I believe beyond question that this site is by far the best, all things considered.

31. August 2005, 04:52:50
Artful Dodger 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
ScarletRose: My heroine

31. August 2005, 04:25:28
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Princess Alison: I am so sorry to have upset you.. and yes.. I didn't think of how the outcome would be. For I really didn't have the intentions of it being taken personally as you had.. please pardon.. and I will remove that post promptly..

31. August 2005, 04:16:28
Chimera 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: The next news item will show up on your main page when ever Fencer posts one

31. August 2005, 04:12:04
plaintiger 
got a question: i've just clicked the "remove" link at the bottom of Fencer's latest news post to make it go away, but having never used that link before, i don't know: will the next news Fencer posts appear when he posts it? or have i just turned his news off until i turn it back on again somewhere?

thank you! :)

31. August 2005, 03:12:57
rod03801 
FEW nice people??? sheesh.. there are lots of nice people on this site. wow..

31. August 2005, 00:08:00
harley 
I'm sure she didn't intend to, Princess Alison. But either way its probably best addressed in private or at a board like general chat.

31. August 2005, 00:03:08
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re:
harley: Well maybe a certain somebody shouldnt leave remarks that can actually hurt somebody's feelings

31. August 2005, 00:00:14
harley 
What Jason said...

30. August 2005, 22:55:27
Ewe 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Princess Alison: You are most welcome, it peed me off quite a bit too!

30. August 2005, 22:51:02
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Lamby: I am fuming over that remark Lamby. Thanks for your support

30. August 2005, 22:49:35
Ewe 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Princess Alison: I agree with you! Some people should think before they speak! Its not about 'skimping' How rude some people are!

30. August 2005, 22:35:21
Adaptable Ali 

30. August 2005, 22:34:53
Jason 

30. August 2005, 22:31:36
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
reza:

30. August 2005, 22:31:07
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
playBunny: Scarlet Rose, mabe you she read all the entires properly so u will understand what is going on here before u accuse people of "skimping" I was not skimping at all, so get your facts right please.

30. August 2005, 22:28:56
Expired 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
playBunny: Or who have money, but cannot pay online!

30. August 2005, 22:26:32
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Princess Alison, ScarletRose: I'll second that. It's not cool to make fun of people who lack money.

30. August 2005, 22:18:32
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
ScarletRose: Excuse me its not a case of skimping.

30. August 2005, 22:16:13
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
Purple: But u shouldnt have to do that, i should have got the brains, end of story. But thanks anyway , you r one of a few nice people on here that support one other

30. August 2005, 21:48:50
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels -- A couple of proposals for the Knight members
Modified by Walter Montego (30. August 2005, 21:53:11)
Fencer: Perhaps the Knights could be allowed to enter up to 10 tournaments of any type or just remove the tournament game type restriction completely instead of limiting them to 1 of each type. Seeing how they are limited to 50 going games total, that should be plenty of tournament admissions. I also fail to see why a Knight is limited by what type of game the tournament is. The total number of games going should be the limiting factor. If someone only wants to play Backgammon, why not let them?

Another thing that can be done, would be to lower the fee for a Knight membership while leaving the restrictions in place and the create a new membership category priced at or near the current Knight membership that would have the restrictions removed and increase the number of going games to 80 or 100. It could be called a Bishop membership and would fit right into the scheme of things. This would give people an extra choice to choose the membership that best suits their needs.

playBunny: I believe that a member is allowed to pay the difference of the price of a Knight member to a Rook membership prorated for the remainder of the Knight membership and get the upgrade in membership. The difference between the two is about 10 euros for a whole year, isn't it? Maybe you can check into that. It doesn't seem like it would cost you much more and your friend's gift would still bare most of the cost.

30. August 2005, 21:39:11
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
eagle eye: True.. haha

30. August 2005, 21:32:48
eagle eye 
Subject: Re: Membership Levels
ScarletRose: ... or pay nothing and enjoy whatever is free :-)

<< <   396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top