User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95   > >>
4. January 2012, 23:54:38
furbster 
Subject: Re: Paypal
firedragon764: paypal is back now

4. January 2012, 23:37:42
firedragon764 
Subject: Paypal
Hello everyone! I'm thinking of buying a membership but I'm not sure if they have a paypal or credit card option? I remember long ago I think paypal was removed or people had problems with it. Just want to make sure before buying if paypal is available and theres no problems :)

3. January 2012, 13:22:22
Purple 
Subject: Re: Too Damned Hard
MadMonkey: Thanks. Will try.

3. January 2012, 13:20:00
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Too Damned Hard
Purple: Just above the message box we type in is a link that says Switch to rich text editor .....have a go at that, its very similar to using any sort of Office or Graphic program

3. January 2012, 13:17:46
Purple 
Subject: Too Damned Hard
But thanks for trying to help.

2. January 2012, 15:59:53
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:

rabbitoid: writting in purple would be a pleonasm. writting in red can be heterodox. What to do?


Maybe Purple must keep on writting in black... :)


2. January 2012, 15:56:58
rabbitoid 
Why should a purple player want to write in red? just thought I'd ask

2. January 2012, 15:36:02
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
gogul: i do it that way or Purple could use the Rich Text Editor

2. January 2012, 14:44:51
gogul 
Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....

2. January 2012, 14:40:15
gogul 
Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
Purple:




Black Rooks
Your text here

Your text here
Your text here


Your text here
Your text here

Your text here
Your text here

Your text this
Your text that

  • Your text this
  • Your text that

    Your text here
    Your text here

    ahaYour text hereaha
    Your text here


    ahaYour text hereaha
    Your text here

    Your text here More colors here: Wiki, transparent = #f0f0f0

    Your text here


    Your text here
    Your text here

    Your text here
    Your text here

    You combine like this: <n><j><s>Your text here</s></j></n>



  • 1. January 2012, 21:50:46
    Papa Zoom 
    You could just write like this ;)

    1. January 2012, 21:48:55
    Papa Zoom 
    ???

    1. January 2012, 16:44:07
    Gabriel Almeida 

    BWILD, Why are  you laughing? I don't know how to write in red too! 

    1. January 2012, 14:53:59
    Bwild 

    1. January 2012, 14:51:22
    Bwild 
    Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
    Purple:switch to rich text editor

    1. January 2012, 14:50:05
    Bwild 
    I havent a clue lol

    1. January 2012, 14:48:36
    Purple 
    Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
    MadMonkey: How does a person write in red on this site? Are there instructions posted so mewhere? Thanks anybody.

    1. January 2012, 07:23:10
    ScarletRose 
    Happy New Year!

    31. December 2011, 22:41:14
    Bwild 
    Subject: Re: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
    MadMonkey:

    31. December 2011, 19:06:19
    MadMonkey 
    Subject: Happy New Year Fencer & all the gamers here.....
    Tomorrow, we will open a new book. It’s pages are blank. We will put words on them ourselves. The book is called Opportunity and its first chapter is New Year’s Day 2012.

    A HAPPY & PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR

    Ian
    MadMonkey

    27. December 2011, 04:17:12
    fukuhara 
    Subject: Next Action
    When will be the next easter code bonuses?

    24. December 2011, 10:35:55
    ketchuplover 
    Subject: Re: For all on this gr8888t site
    DeaD man WalkiN:

    I endorse this sentiment :)

    24. December 2011, 09:03:03
    DeaD man WalkiN 
    Subject: For all on this gr8888t site
    Merry Christmas To all
    Happy New 2012

    22. December 2011, 13:44:31
    Gabriel Almeida 
    Subject: Re: Bonus Left
    Modified by Gabriel Almeida (22. December 2011, 13:45:17)

    Fencer: Ooooohhhh... I wanted one more (Christmas gift!)



    Well... I hope one day my idea can be accepted... something to increase gifts and re-inforce felowships union spirit! :)


    22. December 2011, 13:41:38
    Fencer 
    Subject: Re: Bonus Left
    Gabriel Almeida: Of course.

    22. December 2011, 13:27:20
    Gabriel Almeida 
    Subject: Bonus Left
    The action is over?

    20. December 2011, 23:50:32
    ketchuplover 
    Subject: Re: 100,000 members
    fukuhara:

    chess.com has over 4 million alledgedly...a mod on chesshere claims a million...chessworld.net has a fair amount too

    20. December 2011, 09:51:35
    fukuhara 
    Subject: 100,000 members

    It's great that total number of members reached 100,000. There aren't so many
    online game sites that have more I guess. Congratulations!


    20. December 2011, 09:38:34
    rabbitoid 
    Subject: Re: what does this mean???
    Bernice: It's really about time for the browsers to get rid of those prehistoric rubbish messages.

    20. December 2011, 06:26:44
    Bernice 
    Subject: what does this mean???
    This webpage is not available
    The connection to brainking.com was interrupted.
    Here are some suggestions:
    Reload this webpage later.
    Check your Internet connection. Restart any router, modem, or other network devices you may be using.
    Add Google Chrome as a permitted program in your firewall's or antivirus software's settings. If it is already a permitted program, try deleting it from the list of permitted programs and adding it again.
    If you use a proxy server, check your proxy settings or contact your network administrator to make sure the proxy server is working. If you don't believe you should be using a proxy server, adjust your proxy settings: Go to the wrench menu > Options > Under the Hood > Change proxy settings... > LAN Settings and deselect the "Use a proxy server for your LAN" checkbox.
    Error 101 (net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET): The connection was reset.

    19. December 2011, 17:25:43
    Aganju 
    Subject: Re: Multi-nicks
    Mélusine: I thought about that, yes, and I actually know a family that does it. I meant that all three in combination give a pretty good indicator (and members of the family might even play each other a lot, which is absolutely ok). So maybe there are more indicators needed...

    19. December 2011, 16:59:45
    joshi tm 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Justaminute: You forget the eternal premium members, 106 other Black Rooks and a Black Knight.

    19. December 2011, 16:45:17
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Justaminute: Good point! Although some paying members are no longer active.

    19. December 2011, 15:57:41
    Justaminute 
    Subject: Re: lol
    pedestrian: To fill tournaments the number of paying members is, I would suggest, a better measure than active members. It is also a lot easier to keep track of. Currently rooks 432, Knights 55 and Bishops 20.

    19. December 2011, 15:14:08
    Mélusine 
    Subject: Re: Multi-nicks
    Aganju: I don't totally agree when you say that we can catch a multi nick with the comparison of the IP address, because it can happen that several members of a same family play with the same PC and don't cheat.
    Example : one of the member of the family makes his moves and when he has finished, the other one logs on the site and plays, and each one has his own nick. It happens with teenagers who don't have enough money to get their own PC.

    18. December 2011, 12:56:48
    gogul 
    Don't forget the bk-"closet". Fencer deleted 106 'members', they continue to live in a parallel universe and may as well control the fate!

    17. December 2011, 03:57:34
    Bwild 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    rod03801: "Of course those are the ones who probably have the most accounts. LOL"
    I'd have to agree

    17. December 2011, 03:40:44
    rod03801 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    pedestrian: Oh, I'm not one of the real "paranoids". There are a few people here that think every new person is someone else.

    Of course those are the ones who probably have the most accounts. LOL

    17. December 2011, 03:21:11
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    rod03801: Yes, that's my impression too. But how many are there? Out of the 2000 to 3000 active profiles, how many are here to play (board!) games, and how many are just hanging around? To estimate those numbers, I guess you would have to have access to the server and do what Aganju suggests.

    What I'd like to do is to somehow find out if the number of actual people on the site is going up or down. Those multis are disturbing my circles...

    17. December 2011, 03:10:21
    rod03801 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    Aganju: In my experience, a significant number of multi nics on this site, are here for other reasons than cheating. Many have mind games going on, rather than board games.

    17. December 2011, 03:06:44
    Aganju 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    pedestrian: The multi-nick (or 'cheater') topic has been discussed a lot, also on other game sites.
    On the server end, there are some pretty efficient ways to catch them:
    1. IP address comparison.
    2. Whenever a user logs on, store the IDs that logged off in the previous three minutes. After ten times, if the same ID is in the list too often, it's with high probability a multi nick.
    3. Compare the lists from 1. and 2. with who plays whom. Same user IDs come up, there you go.

    You can imagine that with some fiddling and tuning, this would be rather efficient. Unfortunately, you need to have server access, as the IP address for example is otherwise private data.

    The next question would be - what do you do with multi-nicks? Delete them and lose all running games? Remove any positive rating efffects from playing between them?

    17. December 2011, 02:57:34
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    Aganju: Yes, the number of active profiles is probably in the 2000-3000 range. 

    Then there's a "background noise" of people who log on once, then leave again. Seems to be (roughly) 5000 a year, or 100 a week.

    And there's some "multinicks" like Bwild suggested, people who keep multiple accounts for whatever reason. But it won't be easy to make an estimate of those.

    I may try to keep track of these numbers over time and see if there is any significant change.

    17. December 2011, 02:39:53
    Aganju 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    pedestrian: Well, realistically, 'active' would mean to me logged on in the last weeks, not even a month, so we look at less than 3000 active users.
    On the other hand, that's a lot of people to play with!

    17. December 2011, 02:33:46
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: Users Stats
    coan.net: Thanks, that's great - very helpful! Now we're getting somewhere :-)

    I get these stats:
    Number of profiles logged in the last...

    ... 24 hours: 1907
    ... 48 hours: 2218
    ... week: 2617
    ... month: 3188
    ... year: 7695

    This is a long shot, but does anybody have any idea about the corresponding numbers from earlier times? Did the number of active members go up or down?

    17. December 2011, 02:01:28
    coan.net 
    Subject: Users Stats
    You can go to the players list: http://brainking.com/en/PlayerList?a=ap

    There, you can click on the headers and easily see how many people have logged into the site in the past XXX time frame

    17. December 2011, 00:50:01
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Aganju: Not looking at any particular time frame, actually. I'll more or less sign up for anything, unless the tournament is designed to take decades.

    You're probably right that large tournaments might have a periodic impact on the level of activity, but my hunch is based on long time observations anyway. It just feels like the number of "usual suspects" has decreased.

    17. December 2011, 00:42:04
    Aganju 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Modified by Aganju (17. December 2011, 00:43:05)
    pedestrian: Which time frame are you looking at with that statement?
    When I joined in July, I went into any tournament I could find. After a while, I had over 600 running games, so I slowed down considerably. Then, Adventure X and the Continental Championships started, which gave me 800 more games, so I even removed myself from some pending tournaments.
    My point: can such large tournaments make the kind of impact you see?
    Once I get back down under 500 games, I will start joining again, and maybe many others too?

    17. December 2011, 00:39:22
    Bwild 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Aganju: just shedding a little light through the darkness....but hey some DO care.

    17. December 2011, 00:25:14
    pedestrian 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Thad: I get the feeling that the number of active members in slowly decreasing; it seems increasingly difficult to fill tournaments up. But I don't know, it's only a hunch. Maybe Fencer can enlighten us?

    17. December 2011, 00:11:20
    Thad 
    Subject: Re: lol
    Bwild: OK, then it would at least give us an upper bound, no? And a better one than the 100,000 we have now. ;-)

    << <   86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95   > >>
    Date and time
    Friends online
    Favourite boards
    Fellowships
    Tip of the day
    Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
    Back to the top