User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196   > >>
6. January 2008, 22:24:04
Purple 
Subject: Half The Time
I'm getting a "denied access by publisher of page." Hope this is a temporary glitch not exclusive to me.

6. January 2008, 22:14:55
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Is it just me? or is this site slower than a cheapskate at the checkout counter
Fencer: Without getting into an old conversation, we are trying to be positive (well i am lol)

The site has been great for ages now, BUT since about the time of the Archive, i have a dramatic slowdown in brainking response time.
All other sites, well, the other 7 open in Tabs at present load pages between 1.07 and 3.61 seconds.
Brainking varies wildly though, i can get a games page load in from 1.7 secs which is great, however, any other pages seem to take anywhere from 4 to 20 secs

Just an annoying observation, what has started this again

6. January 2008, 21:52:02
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Is it just me? or is this site slower than a cheapskate at the checkout counter
Jim Dandy: I don't see any problems and I prepare an article which should be the ultimate answer to everyone, once and forever.

6. January 2008, 21:50:54
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Is it just me? or is this site slower than a cheapskate at the checkout counter
Jim Dandy: Yes, i was not going to mention it, but the last few days, in fact since the Data Archiving it has been real bad at times.

I would of thought that would make it faster, like cleaning & defragging

6. January 2008, 21:48:15
The Col 
Subject: Is it just me? or is this site slower than a cheapskate at the checkout counter
can we expect better days ahead?

6. January 2008, 21:08:18
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: When someone sends it.

6. January 2008, 21:07:04
MadMonkey 
Fencer: Look what i found

I want to receive an occasional BrainKing newsletter to my e-mail account

Whens the first one

6. January 2008, 13:09:32
Jason 
Subject: Re:
Nirvana: Yes you can hide someone in a fellowship from others , BB and moderators will still see them though .........but woulsnt it be easier to remove them from the fellowship

6. January 2008, 12:10:44
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Nirvana: This was discussed a while ago and i think Fencers answer was something along these lines.
If you are the Big Boss of a Fellowship, you only have people in there that you choose, and hopefully get on with, and that follow the rules you set down.
You have the power to remove anyone, who does not abide by your rules.

This i would normally agree with, but with one exception, when you have been left in charge of someones Fellowship for a reason of absence. Here it might be nice to have 'suspend a person' option where all there Fellowship privileges are halted (no read/write boards, joining Tournaments & Teams etc....).

6. January 2008, 05:23:23
gogul 
Subject: Re:
Nirvana: As far as I know there is no way to hide someone for everyone exept for the crew I guess. On the other hand side you can get mod there to see hiden posts. Confusing that all

6. January 2008, 05:19:05
Nirvana 
Subject: Re:
gogul: I meant as a moderator, sorry.

6. January 2008, 05:09:39
gogul 
Subject: Re:
Nirvana: You mean as a big boss to hide it for everyone? It's not possible, you can't exept kick "it" out of your f/s.

6. January 2008, 04:42:32
Nirvana 
can anyone tell me please exactly how to put a person in hide in a fellowship?

6. January 2008, 02:48:10
Andersp 
Subject: Re:
coan.net: OK...thanks

6. January 2008, 02:47:19
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
Andersp: Blocking someone stops them from sending you private messages, from being able to invite you to a game or fellowship, stops you from being able to see their game messages.

Hiding them on a discussion board keeps you from seeing their posts on that board. The red numbers still show up.

6. January 2008, 02:46:40
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Andersp:

Block User - This just blocks the user from sending private messages and seeing what they are doing online. No discussion board messages are hidden.

Hide - is for each board, and will hide the post from that user on that board only.

6. January 2008, 02:42:50
Andersp 
Subject: Re:
rod03801: LOL...sorry if you took it "personal"..  lets ask this way instead  Does block hide a members posts in the same way as hide does? 

6. January 2008, 02:40:01
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
Modified by rod03801 (6. January 2008, 02:40:50)
Andersp: This board is not for personal conversations of this sort. Further off topic posts, will be deleted.

6. January 2008, 02:32:42
Andersp 
Subject: Re:
rod03801: If you werent a Glob mod should you see my posts then since you have me on block?

6. January 2008, 02:23:29
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: Then you have someone hidden. Please, this is off topic.

6. January 2008, 02:22:51
srnity 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: Happens to the best of us sometimes

6. January 2008, 02:19:01
Bernice 
I keep getting little red numbers and there isnt anything there :(

6. January 2008, 02:06:41
Jason 

6. January 2008, 01:58:43
Bernice 
did someone say something?

5. January 2008, 23:39:02
Jason 

5. January 2008, 22:16:27
Bernice 
isnt it strange.....the general feelings seems to be all the same.....I'm glad to see that people are starting to wake up.....

Thanks Floosie and Jim :)

5. January 2008, 14:32:02
The Col 
Subject: Re: Fencer,defunct Globs
Bernice: My take on the mod thing (global or the presumed sub human level that I occupied for a brief time) is that it requires unquestioned devotion to the fearless leader,if not,it falls apart like dominos

5. January 2008, 14:15:43
NOT a floosie 
Subject: To Bernice for partially hitting the nail on the head.
Hip-hip hurrah
Hip-hip hurrah
Hip-hip hurrah

5. January 2008, 08:55:14
Fencer 
Subject: Re: What's with the Poker link?
ScarletRose: I will sort it out today or tomorrow, I am not in my office now.

5. January 2008, 06:04:51
ScarletRose 
Subject: What's with the Poker link?

I put up with it for awhile just to humor whatever deal it was you thought was great.. but, now it is getting very annoying.. I am a paid member.. I buy memberships so I don't have to be forced to visit offbrand sites.. I don't care to have a cookie from these sites sitting on my puter because I got used to my Main Page link at the top of the list.. Please either offer a check box to those of us who are not interested in other sites.. or take the link off your site all together..


Thankyou..


4. January 2008, 07:22:55
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Fencer,defunct Globs
redfrog: well at least a Black rook I would have thought HAHAHA

Jim Dandy:with great difficulty, as it seems "depends on who you are" ROFL

4. January 2008, 06:57:19
MadMonkey 
Fencer , that was sorted quickly, made for some funny results though

4. January 2008, 03:44:47
The Col 
Subject: Re: Fencer,defunct Globs
Bernice: granted,but how do you define being "looked after"?

4. January 2008, 03:39:07
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Fencer,defunct Globs
Jim Dandy: hahaha....I reckon.... LOL

But it is the old story, if you dont look after staff they go elsewhere and for better pay as well HAHAHAHA

4. January 2008, 03:29:36
The Col 
Subject: Re: Fencer,defunct Globs
Bernice: I hope they didn't order new business cards recently

4. January 2008, 03:28:07
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Fencer
thanks for updating the staff list...........

4. January 2008, 03:14:10
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
coan.net: I guessed the same, glad i am not having a funny moment

Thought it may be something to do with these meteors

4. January 2008, 03:12:47
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: Probable has something to do with the archiving - archived the data and the tournament tables pointed to the wrong place now.

4. January 2008, 03:10:58
MadMonkey 
Modified by MadMonkey (4. January 2008, 03:12:06)
Example, look at this Madmonkeys 'Gammon' Stakes (6)

The final has just this second started, yet acording to the results a game has already finished, yet click on it and it has not even started

The section results are just loopy.

4. January 2008, 03:08:26
MadMonkey 
Modified by MadMonkey (4. January 2008, 03:09:12)
Is anyone else seeing odd things with Tournamet results tables ?
I was just looking at one, which show a 2 section Tournament.
Section 1 has finished, and the winner coloured yellow YET there are no results in the boxes.
Section 2 is still running, yet every result box has a space for 2 results (which is wrong as it is only a one game match), but the first result shows as unfnished and the second as a draw in EVERY game.
I have tried a couple of Tournaments and go the same basic problem.

I thought it may have been Firefox having a funny moment, so have tried IE and it is the same

3. January 2008, 23:14:56
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: PayPal.
Bernice: Same here. I use it to renew my membership(s) in sites I play in.

3. January 2008, 23:13:50
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: PayPal.
Jason: Yes I remember doing that a few years ago. So I don't understand why this time they paid Fencer by e-cheque.

3. January 2008, 17:39:01
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: Fencer
Bernice: Yeeeessss! Purple would be a GREAT global mod. I believe he will be "the choosen one". Brainking criterias are strange enougth for that... lololol

3. January 2008, 03:43:00
Bernice 
Subject: Fencer
Modified by Bernice (3. January 2008, 03:47:23)
would there be any chance of updating the "Global Moderators" list as I believe that a couple have resigned for one reason or another. It makes it easier when you want to talk to one and theyactually are a Global Moderator.....thanks

2. January 2008, 22:54:52
Jason 
Subject: Re: PayPal.
crosseyed: to activate your paypal account to use your credit card , it takes a few days ........they make a charge to your credit card for a few pence , you use the code that is then given to verify things , at least that is how it used to work when i joined

2. January 2008, 22:48:53
Bernice 
Subject: Re: PayPal.
crosseyed: Im so pleased you got what you wanted :)

Ive never had trouble with Paypal, but then I only use it once or twice a year LOL

2. January 2008, 22:43:45
crosseyed_uk 
Subject: Re: PayPal.
Jason: I went to Paypal and re-added it. I hope it works now.

2. January 2008, 21:10:35
ellieoop 
Subject: Re: Membership
Jason:i've been using paypal for years, it's very easy and it is free, it's very reliable, it goes thru my credit card, and it seems like my payments go thru in no more then 24 hrs.

2. January 2008, 21:05:58
Jason 
Subject: Re: Membership
crosseyed: just to add if you want to do it that way (credit/debit card ect) through paypal you can set it up if you logon to paypal and look for the link to set it up ,

2. January 2008, 21:03:21
Jason 
Subject: Re: Membership
crosseyed: no fee for using it , i bought a membership a few weeks ago and it is instantly done , and the persons membership was updated within a minute , i have it set to use my credit card for payment ,so paypal pays instantly and then charges my credit card

<< <   187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top