User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Ludo

Discuss about the Ludo game or find new opponents.

Ludo rules

A game by any other name....

I Love Ludo Hall of Fame...How many passes have you had in one game?


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

15. July 2006, 00:52:57
actionpoints 
hello everybody again ....

i just finished a game which im assuming might hold a few records ....

1. its a win with the best possible margin that is the oppoent had 4 pieces in.
2. there might be someone else who finished the game in lesser moves but well this one ended in 35 or 36.
3. i heard the most consecutive passes record is 48 this one had less but who know could have gone one to beat that if the game lasted longer.

http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=1760917

im sure i can validate the lucky and unlucky dice theory with this game as well.

15. July 2006, 07:06:31
Sylfest Strutle 
Subject: Re:
actionpoints: im sure i can validate the lucky and unlucky dice theory with this game as well.

Then you would first have to come up with your personal definition of the word validate. ;)

15. July 2006, 07:22:43
actionpoints 
Subject: Re:
whopper: smart reply hehe . im sure we both know the definition of validation but before you start correcting or objecting me please do ask yourself the meaning of theory. (if i were validating a fact ofcourse the word validate would be overkill with 1 meager example but we are talking about theory my friend )

15. July 2006, 16:15:52
Sylfest Strutle 
Subject: Re:
actionpoints: Doesn't validation of a theory make it a fact?

16. July 2006, 02:54:57
actionpoints 
Subject: Re:
whopper: some theories always remain theories like the quantum theory or the space/time theory and 1 can only provide/argue/validate them with whatever knowledge is available . reason these theories remain theories is because the proof or knowledge used to make them acceptable is never enough and they remain arguably acceptable until new data comes in to reject them but in any case my purpose here is not to argue with you endlessly or meaninglessly so if you plan to keep at this nonsense then be my guest and you can crown yourself the king of arguments lol

16. July 2006, 03:00:47
Sylfest Strutle 
Subject: Re:
actionpoints: Why the hostility?

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top