User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

13. July 2010, 21:27:03
Papa Zoom 
Subject: More facts the liberals here will ignore or excuse away
Public confidence in President Obama has hit a new low, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll. Four months before midterm elections that will define the second half of his term, nearly six in 10 voters say they lack faith in the president to make the right decisions for the country, and a clear majority once again disapproves of how he is dealing with the economy.

Regard for Obama is still higher than it is for members of Congress, but the gap has narrowed. About seven in 10 registered voters say they lack confidence in Democratic lawmakers and a similar proportion say so of Republican lawmakers.........

...Independents -- that amorphous body that usually determines elections -- are continuing to migrate away from the Democratic Party. That party is increasingly identified by its leaders: Pelosi, Reid and Obama. They are to the left of many members of the party, but have dragged other party members who have done their bidding for them off the cliff, as well. Many more people identify themselves as conservatives than liberals......

...

13. July 2010, 22:57:16
The Col 
Subject: Re: More facts the liberals here will ignore or excuse away
Artful Dodger: I agree that many Americans consider themselves consrvatives, but they also consider themselves disinfranchised, because the present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years

14. July 2010, 01:23:49
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: This is precisely why many incumbent Republicans are targets for replacement. Big spending and Conservatism don't go together and it's true that the Republicans have seriously lost their way.

14. July 2010, 01:57:15
The Col 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Artful Dodger: I don't know if the Tea Party is a good example of Republicans finding their way, if that is who you feel are doing the targeting. Sharron Angle, what do you think of her?

14. July 2010, 02:13:36
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: What precisely is wrong with the Tea Party movement? I've read what they stand for and it's clearly the core values of historic conservatism.

14. July 2010, 02:15:57
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: I don't know much about Sharron Angle. She's not the tea party.

14. July 2010, 09:10:22
The Col 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Artful Dodger: Sharron Angle is considered "Mrs. Tea Party" , you should check her out

14. July 2010, 17:00:20
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: I've checked her out a little. I'm not seeing a major story here. Aside from a few remarks that some found objectionable, she's a politician. She's NOT the Tea Party. She IS a Tea Party favorite. Lower taxes, support small business growth (the real backbone of the US economy) smaller government, State's rights, adherence to the Constitution - sounds good to me.

14. July 2010, 18:05:58
The Col 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Artful Dodger: Sharron caused a stir with her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest

14. July 2010, 18:28:49
Mort 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Jim Dandy: .. I can see why that would cause a stir. Especially in the case of incest.. genetically that is a most unsafe prospect.. and what if the kid is adopted on and then wants to find out it's real parents.

14. July 2010, 18:33:41
The Col 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
(V): Well,these positions aside, as AD pointed out, she's a Tea Party fave, and has been labled "Mrs. Tea Party"

14. July 2010, 23:18:37
Mort 
Subject: Re: Mrs. Tea Party
Jim Dandy: She'll never throw as good as one as the Queen's tea parties!! If they want to do something... end the lobbying system. But that has to be a national campaign transcending party lines.

When Blair lied and led Parliament into the war millions marched despite party as one.

14. July 2010, 23:29:33
The Col 
Subject: Re: Mrs. Tea Party
(V): Ending lobbying would go a long way towards putting the power back with the people who elect.Obama has not been helpful in this regard

14. July 2010, 23:32:06
Mort 
Subject: Re: Mrs. Tea Party
Modified by Mort (14. July 2010, 23:32:26)
Jim Dandy: No-one has. They are to afraid to face down the big corporations and lose out on the gravy train that comes after being in office. We have the problem in the UK even though there are regs and laws to stop such if caught.

14. July 2010, 23:41:12
The Col 
Subject: Re: Mrs. Tea Party
(V): Well,that's where Obama loses me, if he had no intention of dealing with issues such as lobbying, he should have kept his mouth shut on the campaign trail.He has actually broadened the ability for major corporations to spend on campaigns, not limited them

15. July 2010, 00:44:44
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Ending lobbying would go a long way towards putting the power back with the people who elect.
Jim Dandy:

15. July 2010, 00:44:03
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Well,these positions aside, as AD pointed out, she's a Tea Party fave, and has been labled "Mrs. Tea Party"
Jim Dandy: So what? You've explained nothing.

14. July 2010, 23:28:49
Mort 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Tuesday: If God didn't want abortions.. why does The I AM allow miscariages to happen, still borns and bad mutations? In some respects we do not show the same respect that we do to animals in the name of a collection of words often mistranslated and used. God breathed life into clay.. clay did not make life.

14. July 2010, 23:42:09
Mort 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Tuesday: From progs describing the having a baby.. it is a bit of a fight between mum and baby... that's why things can go wrong. It'll never be a 100% process.

14. July 2010, 23:45:11
The Col 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Tuesday: Are you of the opinion that an individual should be forced to carry a child even if was from a rape or incest?

14. July 2010, 23:50:52
The Col 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Tuesday: We can agree to disagree on this one

15. July 2010, 02:31:35
Ferris Bueller 
Subject: Re: pwith her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest

I hope none of us who want to see women's rights to have an abortion abridged in these cases never have to experience rape or incest themselves.


Lets start by taking care of the babies that are already born.  I've seen the results of children who are wards of the state at age 16-17 because they were never adopted or had a caregiver apart from the state.  It isn't a pretty sight.


15. July 2010, 00:42:53
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Sharron caused a stir with her position against abortion even in cases of rape and incest
Jim Dandy: that's my position. So I don't see it as causing a stir. The ONLY time abortion is justified is when the life of the mother is in immediate threat. Unfortunately, even this "immediate threat" has to be defined. It means that if the mother continues with the pregnancy, there's a huge chance she will die.

The reason I'm against abortion would prohibit an abortion even in the case of rape and incest. Otherwise my position would be inconsistent and irrational.

14. July 2010, 10:20:57
Mort 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: The tea party movement will just cause the GOP to be a non entity regarding major elections. The Democrats must be laughing at the infighting over who's a better conservative. Just like happened in the USSR under Stalin and any other movement that has sought to micro analysis what it is to be a good party member.

14. July 2010, 11:31:01
The Col 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
(V): While I can't see the Republicans become a "non entity regarding major elections"
The current witch hunt will not have a happy ending IMO

14. July 2010, 14:10:06
Mort 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: Witch hunts never end up good... McCarthyism is a prime example. I say non entity as we in the UK have witnessed a party having two or more go for being elected as an MP.. It splits the vote. The Republicans might end up fighting a tea party favourite therefore losing out entirely to the Democrats.

14. July 2010, 17:09:09
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: present Republican form of conservativism isn't, and hasn't been for years
Jim Dandy: What you call a witch hunt is what political parties do all day long. They find the chink in the armor of an opponent and they go after that. Democrats, Republicans, Whateverans, they ALL do it.

The NAACP just passed a resolution against the Tea Party. Are they on a witch hunt?

To be on a witch hunt, you have to be looking for issues/problems that don't exist. In Salem, they were looking for witches which some there were only happy to help find. Even if that meant lying (which most did if not all). The Tea Party is not a a witch hunt. They are a political group exercising their Constitutional right to participate in the political process. And consistent with that right is their right to oppose candidates that don't represent their views. Additionally, they have the right to actively oppose those politicians with campaigns to defeat those they oppose and put in place those with whom they agree. This is what ALL parties do.

So what is wrong with that? Simply calling something a witch hunt explains nothing. It's a lazy way to have a discussion. He's a liar. She's a racist. They are on a witch hunt. What the hell kind of argument are those lazy statements? They say nothing unless backed with a rational and well formulated argument with examples and explanations. You've given the former and totally avoided the latter.

What makes your statements against the Tea Party any less of a witch hunt as you put it?

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top