Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Subject: re:Pouring petrol onto embers is not a good way of putting a fire out
Well, Hamas's version of "pouring petrol" is much less desirable than inhabiting disputed lands IMO, they have been known to do it literally, not figuratively, but I suppose that doesn't fit their new freedom fighter image
Subject: Re: re:Pouring petrol onto embers is not a good way of putting a fire out
The Col: Never does in such conflicts... remember, we had Northern Ireland. In the end it didn't matter who did what as they all sides (IRA/Loyalists/Army/British Gov/ Irish supporters) .. and the rest of supporting 'actors' had blood on their hands. We still today have "The Real IRA" (who are not the real IRA) killing even after all the major parties have said "enough".