I think the whole point of the 3 wins match was for games like checkers. If I win 3 and draw 15 against a player on here, my rating would go way down despite having won by a large margin. But, with the 3 wins format, it is like the draws never happened, and the match is rated in a way to keep the ratings balanced.

A 3 wins match in Gothic Chess, in my opinion, is a great injustice. To win 3 games against one opponent is not easy, and to treat it as just one win is unfair.

Also, opponents in a checkers 3-win match have no way to conceed a draw. After 100 games, all draws, can't we just end it?

This format needs rethinking. It needs at least some sort of "stopping condition". Say after 15 games, the one with the most points wins.

Anything but perpetual play.