User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Walter Montego 
 Chess variants (10x8)

Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as
Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too


For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position
... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


List of discussion boards
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

6. March 2006, 22:11:27
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
GOD: Well Ed Trice played the highest level of Gothic Chess above all others in my opinion at Brainking, considering of course ONLY the games i have seen here....

I note again of course that this doesn't mean he should be first in the rating list. Also that this doesn't mean he shouldn't be first in the rating list. The first in the list comes from the definition and execution of the Brainking's formula.


Also note that:
If someone doesn't know to explain his moves while his moves are on a high level, this would imply cheating from his part.
But if someone does know to explain his moves while his moves are on a high level, this would NOT imply a NON-cheating from his part.
With other words: He could cheat even if he can play at a high level and explain the moves he played....
Note also that i don't speak about Ed or another specific person.....

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top