User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


List of discussion boards
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

16. April 2005, 05:27:32
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: although I evidently don't play on draw
Modified by Walter Montego (18. April 2005, 01:14:31)
danoschek: [post edited WQ] I wonder why though? How'd draws ever come to be seen as an acceptable outcome for a game? If the game is truly that evenly played, then a draw it is. I think allowing players to agree to draws while there's still a chance for one side or the other to win is wrong. If anything, I'd require more moves to be made before an agreed to draw is allowed, but I think eliminating them except for the ways I said earlier plus stalemates would be the way to lower the number of draws without changing the rules of Chess.

I see that you have draws in Backgammon and Pente. How is it possible to have a draw in either one of those games when it can't happen if played by the rules that I know?

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top