 |
|
 Chinese ChessXiangqi - Chinese Chess Knights and Rooks may join the Xiangqi Fellowship which has additional boards for discussion and resources (links to other sites). Pawns may not join the fellowships, but links from the Xiangqi resources board are have been copied to a Resources message. Create a New game of Xiangqi, Established ratings, Provisional ratings, The Rules of Xiangqi. ___________________________ You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
19. October 2006, 18:34:56 Subject: game analysis befor i quit this site, i would like to do the self annotation of the following game: i hope to share my view with other players. 435152(red unrated) vs FromHell(black 2222) 2. 5 October 2006, 19:57:18 1.Che3 Ng8 2.Ng3 Rh10 black's move is flexible that may be developed to 12 different openings, for example: 3.Rh1 Ch4 4. Pg5 Ce8 5.Nf5 Nc8....Rh10 is more flexible than Nc8. 3.Nc3 Pg6 4.Pc5 Nc8 5.Rh1 now i have two lines to consider, i decided on Rh1, the other one is Cb5, followed by Pg5 to develop my knight. 5..... Cb4 6. Pe5 Ch4 black blocked my rook with two cannons. 7.Pe6 Ece8 8.Pd6 Nf6 so far so good for both sides, the first 8 moves are all book moves following the theory. 9.Ce4 Rh5? when i saw this move i was very surprised that my opponent, as the no.2 chinese chess player on the top list, would play like this. his intention is to capture my pawn at c5, if Pg5 Rxg5 or Ee3 Nxe4... 10. Rxh4 Rxh4 11. Cxh4 Cxh4 black lost one move for this exchange. now my next move is to block his rook to control the b-file. 12.Rb1 Rb10 13.Cb7 Gde9 14.Pg5 giving up a pawn to get my horse in play. if black wanted to keep the pawn after knight exchanged,then black has a lone cannon on one side it would not give me any trouble,i just concentrated to block his army on the other side, i felt safe on my right side. 14...... Pxg5 15.Nge4 Nxe4 16.Nxe4 Pf5 black should make that move Na9 now 17. Nf6 Na9 18. Cb9 Ch9 19. Nh7 Cxb9? we played the last 3 moves quite quickly, black captured the cannon without thinking almost instantly, the reason may be, it looked like a trap red set up to win his rook, if black captured the cannon with rook, then Ng9 check, so he captured with his cannon, he did not know the cannon is poision. he should have played Cf9. 20.Rb8 Kd10 after Rb8, black's army are pinned on one side, he was completely paralyzed and i have my horse(knight) running free at will on the other side. 21.Nf6 Black resigned this is my last post. 26. October 2006, 15:40:32 Subject: Re: game analysis Modified by cheating up up (28. October 2006, 16:59:23) after i post my "last post" here, sometimes i still login to see if some one will comment on the game "435152 vs FromHell". i could not resist the temptation. here, i found another game of CryingLoser, the no.1 chinese chess player of this site, i would like to comment on it. there are many private games, i don't know why they are still a private game, they are "finished games" now. CryingLOSER (red) vs Kleineme(black) 5 nov 2005 tournament: Glenfiddich(Oriental games vs Lorien) 1.Che3 Nc8 2. Ri2 Cf8 3. Rd2 Ng8 4. Pg5 Rh10 5. Ng3 Rh6 6. Cbc3 Pg6 black should have played Rb10 to control the b-file, if Na3 Ca8.. 7. Pxg6 Rxg6 8. Na3 Rb10 9. Rb1 Cb4 10. Pc5 Ege8 should be the other elephant up 11. Rd4 Cb2 12. Rd2 Cb4 13. Rd4 Cb6 red was perpetually chasing black's cannon which is unprotected, if black wanted to keep the same moves, red must stop doing that. 14. Rd9 Gfe9 15. Nc4 Cf9 16. Rd2 Pe6 17. Rb5 Rg4 18. Rd6 Pc6 19. Rd7 Cf4 20. Na5 Pxc5 21. Rxc5 Nce7 22. Nb7 Rb8 23. Cxe6 Rxg3 24. Cxc10+ Exc10 25. Rxc10 Kf10?? black should have played Cf10 instead of Kf10, then everything is alright for black. if 26. Nd8+ Rxd8 27. Rxd8 Rg6 28. Ce5 Re6... red won this game not because he played well, just because black did not know how to defend. the game looked like a beautiful game red sacrificed two pieces but he did not calculate accurately. the sacroifice is not the correct one. so the loser became a winner 27. October 2006, 04:28:05 Subject: Re: game analysis 435152: That is a flaming comment (regarding Crying Loser, at the bottom of the last post. 435152 should be restricted when talking about other players. 27. October 2006, 15:22:52 Subject: Re: game analysis Modified by inpassant (28. October 2006, 17:03:58) 435152: I got sick of reading so much criticism from you about games other players play. Why not analyze your own games? Come on, tell us how good or bad you are. Or do you play perfectly? "Quote removed" This is a flaming comment as emmett said. Don´t mess players about their play just because they don´t do as a professional. I hope that post will be your last one, really. Edited only to remove the quote referenced, since I removed it from the original posts 27. October 2006, 21:16:35 Subject: Re: game analysis Modified by cheating up up (28. October 2006, 17:00:55) naughtypawn: the previous post re: game analysis on 26 October 2006, 15:40:32 supposed to be my last post, but, after i read your post i decided to add one more as my last post here. > "I got sick of reading so much criticism from you about games other players play. Why not analyze your own games? Come on, tell us how good or bad you are. Or do yoiu pay perfectly?" i just pointed out the mistakes the other players play, it is not thing wrong with that, if you think that is a criticism it is up to you. in my view, if some one could do the same thing to me i will be very happy to accept that. that way, i know what is wrong with my play, i can learn from my mistake. i remembered long time ago, every time my teacher pointed out my mistakes , i always said " thanks sir" this is my way to learmn to play my chinese chess, also, it is why i am better than all of your guys here. i did analyze my own game, if you read the post on 19 October 2006, 435152 vs FromHell, after that post i wanted to see if some one will comment on "my self annotation" of that game, so i still login sometimes, hoping that some one will give me a good idea how to play that game better, or if i missed something that i did not see. did i play perfectly? how good i am? to tell the true, i am better than most of your guys here. no body is perefect,there are always some one is better than you, but if your opponent see one move ahead of you, you always are a loser, you can not win. at first, i think the chinese chess discussion board needed a player like me to do more xiangqi game analysis. i do not know that will make some one sick. but this is my last post. no more. 28. October 2006, 16:57:01 Subject: Re: game analysis 435152: "at first, i think the chinese chess discussion board needed a player like me to do more xiangqi game analysis." "it is why i am better than all of your guys here."    but this is my last post. no more.   28. October 2006, 16:57:55 Subject: Re: game analysis  435152: While analyzing other peoples' games may not technically be wrong, the way you were doing it did not appear very polite. You should probably reconsider doing that. And there is really no need to be sharing your views on fellow Brainking users appearances on this board. I have edited out those comments. 14. November 2006, 10:28:19 Subject: Re: game analysis 435152: You complained and complained and complained about the quality of players on this site. How they were all jokes and so far below your level. But, now I see that someone is playing you well, and you accuse him of using a computer program! Unbelievable. 19. March 2009, 15:19:43 Subject: Re: game analysis forweg: playing online always there are suspect to use computer to cheat. do you know the different between human and computer move? 15. November 2006, 01:07:39 Subject: Re: game analysis 435152: Why don't you bring some other good players to this site? I'm sure sure they will come when they hear that a marvelous player like yourself play here. 19. March 2009, 15:10:26 Subject: Re: game analysis fakar10: after 2 years+- my reply is that: no good chinese chess player will come here to play...i quit this site the 2nd time now |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Moderator: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |