Uzanta Nomo: Pasvorto:
Nova Uzanta Registrado
Moderatoro: rod03801 
 Ludo

Discuss about the Ludo game or find new opponents.

Ludo rules

A game by any other name....

I Love Ludo Hall of Fame...How many passes have you had in one game?


Mesaĝoj en paĝo:
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.
Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi
Serĉi en mesaĝoj:  

15. Julio 2006, 00:52:57
actionpoints 
hello everybody again ....

i just finished a game which im assuming might hold a few records ....

1. its a win with the best possible margin that is the oppoent had 4 pieces in.
2. there might be someone else who finished the game in lesser moves but well this one ended in 35 or 36.
3. i heard the most consecutive passes record is 48 this one had less but who know could have gone one to beat that if the game lasted longer.

http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=1760917

im sure i can validate the lucky and unlucky dice theory with this game as well.

15. Julio 2006, 07:06:31
Sylfest Strutle 
Temo: Re:
actionpoints: im sure i can validate the lucky and unlucky dice theory with this game as well.

Then you would first have to come up with your personal definition of the word validate. ;)

15. Julio 2006, 07:22:43
actionpoints 
Temo: Re:
whopper: smart reply hehe . im sure we both know the definition of validation but before you start correcting or objecting me please do ask yourself the meaning of theory. (if i were validating a fact ofcourse the word validate would be overkill with 1 meager example but we are talking about theory my friend )

15. Julio 2006, 16:15:52
Sylfest Strutle 
Temo: Re:
actionpoints: Doesn't validation of a theory make it a fact?

16. Julio 2006, 02:54:57
actionpoints 
Temo: Re:
whopper: some theories always remain theories like the quantum theory or the space/time theory and 1 can only provide/argue/validate them with whatever knowledge is available . reason these theories remain theories is because the proof or knowledge used to make them acceptable is never enough and they remain arguably acceptable until new data comes in to reject them but in any case my purpose here is not to argue with you endlessly or meaninglessly so if you plan to keep at this nonsense then be my guest and you can crown yourself the king of arguments lol

16. Julio 2006, 03:00:47
Sylfest Strutle 
Temo: Re:
actionpoints: Why the hostility?

Dato kaj horindiko
Amikoj salutintaj
Favoritaj forumoj
Kunularoj
ĈĉĜĝĤĥĴĵŜŝŬŭ

Hodiaŭa konsilo
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, ĉiuj rajtoj reservita.
Supren