Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Temo: Re:Legalization of "softer" drugs has worked in other countries, but politically unacceptable in many places.
Czuch: "Also, just because one drug is "better" than some other legal one, is not a good argument for it to be legal as well, IMHO."
If a legal drug is "worse" than an illegal one, should it be illegal? Seems kind of logical to me. But of course I see the opposite as logical as well.
As far as I'm concerned, as long as marijuana is illegal, booze should be as well.
Let the drunks get prescriptions for booze I guess.
In actuality, I fully support legalization of marijuana. With the same restrictions as alcohol. Unfortunately, as far as I know, there isn't a test to tell if you are CURRENTLY under the influence of marijuana. I believe the only tests are if you have recently smoked it. (Which could be a week ago!)
(kaŝi) Se vi regule rigardas nur al kelkaj el la diskut-forumoj, vi povas aldoni ilin al viaj preferataj forumoj irante al la paĝo "Diskut-forumoj" kaj klakante "aldoni al preferataj forumoj". (pauloaguia) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)