Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
(V): You cite only short term losses. I clearly said that over the long run:
Peter Arcidiacono found that among teens, “increasing access to contraception may actually increase long run pregnancy rates even though short run pregnancy rates fall. On the other hand, policies that decrease access to contraception, and hence sexual activity, may lower pregnancy rates in the long run.”
You must have forgotten to read that part. And just in case you need an extra clue, from 2008 to 2009 is a "short run pregnancy rate...."
(kaŝi) Se vi volas ŝpari rettrafikon, vi povas malpliigi la kvanton da informoj aperantaj en viaj paĝoj, en la Agorodoj. Provu ŝanĝi la nombron da ludoj en la Ĉefpaĝo kaj la nombron da mesaĝoj en ĉiu paĝo. (pauloaguia) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)