Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Temo: Re: Though it got more attention than the fascinating Rupert Murdoch.
Artful Dodger: "...what's the SCOTUS going to rule on Obama Care tomorrow?"
It's hard to say. I'm hoping they look to the constitution to determine if any of it is constitutional or not. Some Washington insiders are of the opinion that the constitutionality of Obama care is what the judges should be looking at. Last time I looked that actually was a part of their job description, or is their job description... I'm a bit fuzzy on the details. *cough*
Obama is either going to gloat, or make a big stink over it, that's what I predict... I'm hedging my bets.
(kaŝi) Se vi volas saluti iun en ties denaska lingvo, provu nian 'vortaron de ludanto', en la ligo "pli pri lingvoj" sub la flagoj. (pauloaguia) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)