1. If Larry Silverstein admitted WTC 7 was "pulled" (i.e., demolished), why did this confession not make it into the 9/11 Commission Report?
2. Why did the 9/11 Commission, supposedly leaving no stone unturned, fail to even mention the collapse of a 47-story building in NYC on 9/11?
3. Why did NIST not address at all the prima facie evidence of explosives, and instead simply endeavor to come up with an alternate, less likely theory, based on fire?
4. Why was eye-witness testimony about molten metal beneath WTC-7 (and also beneath the Towers), entirely ignored?
5. Why was firefighter testimony not even read into the record, much less written into the final report?
6. How could a building, any building, collapsing as a result of fire damage, fail at every point simultaneously, so as to produce no resistance in its downward plummet, precisely in the manner controlled demolition is carefully wired to accomplish?
7. What amount of energy does it take to pulverize a whole skyscraper-full of concrete? Can gravity alone supply this energy?
8. Why was WTC-7 wreckage withheld from examination? This was widely protested by leading publications, including that of the Firefighter's association. One never removes forensic evidence from a crime scene. Yet this evidence was immediately sold to the Far East for scrap metal, etc.
9. Why, nevertheless, was sulphate discovered in the dust, an ingredient added to explosives to make them burn hotter?

These are all reasonable questions, and all have answers. None of the answers, so far, exonerate the U.S. government from culpability in the 9/11 attacks. The fact that most of these pertinent questions have been completely ignored, as if they didn't exist, is further evidence of duplicity on the part of the U.S. government.