Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Czuch:WTC7 had major structural damage. That structural damage put a high degree of stress on supports for the building. They began to weaken. The question is: Did that structural damage put enough stress on support points so that they eventually gave way. The fires clearly didn't do it. Falling chunks of buildings 1 and 2 ripped into building 7. The fires may have contributed to structural weakness but weren't the main factor.
(kaŝi) Uzu la notblokon por vidi kiel via karakteristiko aspektus kun html kodo antaŭ sendi ĝin. (Nur por pagitantaj membroj) (rednaz23) (Montri ĉiujn konsilojn)