Moderatoro: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.

Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:05:24

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Comment: absurd decision on Obama makes a mockery of the Nobel peace prize

The London Times

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:06:47

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

Artful Dodger: Yes... Murdoch press. Ow wow!!

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:13:28

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

(V): Well, the Prize was given to a known terrorist too so I guess since anyone can get one, even a do nothing like Obama can get one too.

Someone else writes his speech, he delivers it, and he gets a prize. That speech writer better get a cut.

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:17:08

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

Artful Dodger: Every politician has speech writers.. I remember McCain's getting it wrong a few times.. or was it him????

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:18:58

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

(V): That's not the point. It's a peace prize. Where's the peace? It's a meaningless thing at this point. What will they all say when Obama steps up the war in Afghanistan?

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:21:33

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

Artful Dodger: Ok.. you are saying it's ok to let the Taliban off the hook for 9/11?? And more troops mean a shorter war. You want your troops home don't you??

10. Oktobro 2009, 02:24:36

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:Ok.. you are saying it's ok to let the Taliban off the hook for 9/11?

(V): I didn't say that. I said butterflys eat pizza. extra cheese

10. Oktobro 2009, 14:32:57

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:I said butterflys eat pizza. extra cheese

Artful Dodger: So... you recognise that the troops needed to free Afghanistan from the Taliban are needed, the Iraq war diverted needed resources from the fight to destroy the Taliban.

btw.. Butterfly's eating pizza.. which sci-fi B movie did that come from. Sounds like an old story from 2000AD

10. Oktobro 2009, 17:55:21

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:So... you recognise that the troops needed to free Afghanistan from the Taliban are needed, the Iraq war diverted needed resources from the fight to destroy the Taliban.

(V): I've noticed that when your arguments are weak, you always resort to claiming things that were never said. Better would be to form that statement into a question. And try to avoid leading questions. Those are easy to spot as well.