BrainKing - Diskutaj forumoj (Politics)

Moderatoro: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.

Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi

10. Decembro 2011, 21:37:07

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Logic is abused and often chemical biological truths are mixed in to cause a move from binary to at least a trinary system. That languages keep on changing, and you've always got a chance of a ghost in the machine.

.. Especially back when I was at college when punch cards were used to program the mainframe, as we did back then before PC's!!

10. Decembro 2011, 21:40:39

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:

(V): philosophical logic??? off in left field?

10. Decembro 2011, 21:44:35

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:philosophical logic???

Artful Dodger: Seems there are several languages or varieties of that.

10. Decembro 2011, 21:53:35

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:philosophical logic???

(V): I was speaking of formal logic. But then you knew that, right?

11. Decembro 2011, 12:33:52

Mort

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re:philosophical logic???

Artful Dodger: Formal logic.... excluding a middle ground... .... yes, I understand the idea, but as having dealt with logic on a formal training ground in the likes of the ultimate logic devices, computers.

.... I find that it's not logical.

A computer uses 01, yet from that it must to operate, be capable of and/or gates as well as yes/no.

Then after reading up I have to ask, are you talking about the Aristotle version or Begriffsschrift?