Moderatoro: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.

Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi

4. Marto 2009, 06:41:37

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

ALL ISRAELI—BUT NO PALESTINIAN–LEADERS WANT TO END THE CONFLICT

4. Marto 2009, 07:03:46

The Usurper

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: "All Israel - But No Palestinian - Leaders Want to End the Conflict"

Artful Dodger: This article (in your link) is written by Barry Rubens, a professor in Herzliya, Israel. He is American in nationality & Jewish in ancestry. Some might consider those affiliations cause for bias, and his sweeping statements therefore to be taken with a grain of salt.

4. Marto 2009, 07:09:19

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: "All Israel - But No Palestinian - Leaders Want to End the Conflict"

The Usurper:Not so. It's a logical fallacy to "take with a grain of salt" historical facts simply because they are reported by someone who shares ancestry with the land he is reporting on. You can't just wipe them out because the person reporting is Jewish. His Jewishness doesn't preclude truth telling.

4. Marto 2009, 07:14:58

The Usurper

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: "His Jewishness doesn't preclude truth telling."

Artful Dodger: It certainly doesn't. But it does raise the odds that he is playing funny with the "facts." It is logical to take this into consideration.

4. Marto 2009, 07:21:01

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: "His Jewishness doesn't preclude truth telling."

The Usurper:It is logical to keep it in mind but it doesn't necessarily "raise the odds" as his information can easily be checked out. If what you say is true, then no news source is trustworthy as all of us, no matter what we claim to the contrary, have a bias. I am biased toward the conservative view. But if I report on something the Democrats said or did, the fact that I favor conservatism doesn't preclude my truth telling with regard to my reporting. You commit a logical fallacy when you paint the report because of the source. The source MAY be relevant to the criticism, but it doesn't simply follow that since the reporter is close to the story then the story must be taken with a grain of salt.

I do get your point but I'm still right.

4. Marto 2009, 07:12:42

Papa Zoom

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: "All Israel - But No Palestinian - Leaders Want to End the Conflict"

The Usurper:What you can do is show where the Palestinians have put forth real and consistent effort at peace. Rather than try to refute everything I offer, show some positive proof. And BTW, wikipedia isn't a reliable source. Even I can contribute to articles there. It's not a scholarly deposit of information. It's a collection of information from anyone who cares to add to the lot. Sure there are safeguards, but it's the internet and I went to the link and was able to edit some of the information. So how reliable is that source?