BrainKing - Diskutaj forumoj (Achievements)

Moderatoro: Fencer

Achievements

Achievements.

Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Kavaliro.

Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi

15. Majo 2009, 12:43:46

AbigailII

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

I thought this meant that for 10 (50) game types, you have to win 50 games against different opponents. But then it claims that for the first one, I've done "7/10", which I assume to mean that I've beaten 50 different opponents in 7 different game types; however, for the second one, I have "6/50". Which would mean I've beaten 50 different opponents in only 6 different game types.

But that doesn't make sense.

So, what does this archievement mean? Or is there a bug somewhere?

16. Majo 2009, 05:40:25

nodnarbo

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

AbigailII: what if 7/10 really means you've beaten 7 different opponents if 50 different game types?

16. Majo 2009, 07:33:28

cd power

montri mesaĝojn de ĉi tiu uzanto | montri fadenon | ligilo

Temo: Re: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

AbigailII: I think there is a bug in those achievements, too. For the achievement "10 won games of 50 game types and at least 10 moves," I have watched and counted several variants where I have sailed past 10 victories against unique opponents and more than 10 moves, but the counter never changed. The only explanation I can think of is this: The unique opponents that you have beaten in one variant can not be the same opponents you have beaten in another variant. For example, if I beat 10 different people in atomic chess, I must beat a totally different set of 10 people in corner chess in order for me to get credit for those 2 variants, meaning 20 unique people. If this is not the case, then there is definitely a bug.