Uzanta Nomo: Pasvorto:
Nova Uzanta Registrado
Moderatoro: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Mesaĝoj en paĝo:
Listo de diskutaj forumoj
Vi ne rajtas afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo. La minimuma necesa nivelo de la membreco por afiŝi mesaĝojn en ĉi tiu forumo estas Brain-Peono.
Moduso: Ĉiu rajtas sendi
Serĉi en mesaĝoj:  

17. Oktobro 2007, 03:16:41
coan.net 
Why is people arguing about this?

People have different opinions. But the one that counts on this issue is Fencer - and if anyone can get Fencer to work on this feature rather then on the site and/or games - well good luck.

Otherwise, I think it is safe to say that many would like it - some don't care, and probable a few don't want it. Is there anything else we need to say about this?

17. Oktobro 2007, 04:56:33
playBunny 
Temo: Re:
Modifita de playBunny (17. Oktobro 2007, 04:59:12)
coan.net: Is there anything else we need to say about this?

Speak for yourself. Do you need to say anything? If not then be silent. As for other's needs to say anything? You either have a need to know ASAP whether they do or not - or you are telling others that you have a need for them not to say what they have to say.

17. Oktobro 2007, 04:58:23
Czuch 
Temo: Re:
playBunny: Ditto

17. Oktobro 2007, 15:49:02
coan.net 
Temo: Re:
playBunny: The reason I posted that was that the conversation was moving away from a discussion and into an argument - with all points in the subject already covered. Sorry if I did not make myself clear in what I said and possible offended you or something.

(But as a side note - since my post, no new points in the discussion has come up - just the same ones... wow, who could have predicted that.)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Anyway, as a Moderator of this board - PLEASE keep this board as a place to discuss issues. The discussion has been moving close to being an argument which is not wanted here. Thank you.

17. Oktobro 2007, 18:49:50
playBunny 
Temo: Re:
coan.net: (But as a side note - since my post, no new points in the discussion has come up - just the same ones... wow, who could have predicted that.)

A discussion trailing off isn't necessarily vindication of a "why don't you shut up?" post, it's quite possibly a sign that you piped up redundantly. So who could have predicted it? Anybody.

I'm sorry that you think this is argument rather than discussion. This is the liveliest that this board has been for a long time. Perhaps a sleeping board is preferred?

17. Oktobro 2007, 19:14:16
alanback 
Temo: Re:
playBunny:  I think we're not supposed to wake the sleeping webmaster ;-)

17. Oktobro 2007, 19:50:21
coan.net 
Temo: Re:
playBunny: Some people want it - some people don't. (and some don't care either way) - is there another point of discussion? But whatever, lets keep "discussing it".

Again, sorry if you took it as a "shut up" type of post.

18. Oktobro 2007, 00:54:45
Czuch 
Temo: Re:
coan.net: The discussion has been moving close to being an argument which is not wanted here. Thank you.


As a moderator that was all we expect.....

The condescending, sarcastic, and mostly annoying rhetoric lead us to believe that you werent acting as a moderator, but just plain ol BBW

18. Oktobro 2007, 01:18:58
alanback 
Temo: Re:
Czuch:  I agree, only I should be allowed to be condescending, sarcastic, and modestly annoying.

18. Oktobro 2007, 01:35:47
coan.net 
Temo: Re:
Czuch: I've already told the bunny sorry twice, I will now say sorry to you also for whatever bad thing that I have done to you with my couple of posts.

18. Oktobro 2007, 01:39:44
Czuch 
Temo: Re:
coan.net: Its okay, no apology necessary

Just try to be more distinct as to when you are posting as a moderator compared to other posts

Dato kaj horindiko
Amikoj salutintaj
Favoritaj forumoj
Kunularoj
ĈĉĜĝĤĥĴĵŜŝŬŭ

Hodiaŭa konsilo
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, ĉiuj rajtoj reservita.
Supren