Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
: I think the answer to your question is also in the 14 the amendment, it's a line that gets forgotten all to often.
"all persons born or naturalized in the United states, AND UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF..."
That last line is what conveniently gets dropped, and is why babies of illegal aliens should not get get citizenship, that point was made clear by the authors of the amendment. and is why babies born outside of their country of citizenship should get their birthright from their parents country, not visa-versa
personally I do not think the law needs to be changed, only the judges who Ignore the Constitution in favor of their personal agenda, and the idiots in congress who fail to tell them "thanks for your opinion but take a hike as your opinion has no place here" Legally, the only jurisdiction the judges have is to rule the amendment constitutional or not, either way citizenship would not be allowed
(piilota) Jos haluat saada tiedon viimeisimmistä viesteistä keskustelualueilla, voit saada RSS-viestin klikkaamalla RSS-logoa kunkin keskustelualueen oikeassa yläkulmassa. (pauloaguia) (näytä kaikki vinkit)