 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
15. Syyskuu 2011, 16:57:31 So.. if the Constitution is so perfect... why were non white folk banned in many states of America from owning guns after the civil war? Hardly fair and balanced. 15. Syyskuu 2011, 22:25:02 Otsikko: Re: (V): Who said the American constitution is perfect? It did provide a templet for wrongs, which were already established practice, to be corrected. You talk about it as though the change should have been instantaneous. A better question would be, how did an established and approved of way of doing things, and practiced all over the world (including your own country), become abolished? The constitution was built upon, among other things, judea-christian principles and laws and your own magna carta. Were non white folk banned in England from owning guns immediately after your own slaves were freed? |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |