 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
1. Huhtikuu 2012, 13:09:42 1. Huhtikuu 2012, 22:44:20 Otsikko: Re:  (V): Less bias than what? Cooper asked several leading questions rather than let the father speak for himself. Cooper led him down a path that was DESIGNED to make Zimmerman look bad. Zimmerman may be guilty of murder, I don't know. Maybe under the law it will be only manslaughter. But you don't either and neither does anyone at this point (including the Father). The Father doesn't possess all the facts and neither does the lawyer. People ought to wait until all the facts are known before making judgments. Next we'll look at Cooper's interview. Still want an answer on "less biased" ....than what?? Examples please. Or are you just here to quibble?  |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |