Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
The Col: "My comment of it being considered "gospel" was from the Republican perspective, not Democratic"
Yes, and I understood what you meant by "gospel". Nevertheless, I doubt either side would take the issue seriously even if it was promoted by a few Republicans.
It has only become a political issue because some politicians have made it one. It wasn't much of a scientific issue until it was mingled with politics
The only question I want to ask about this is, when did it become a standard practice of science that politics is able to confirm or disprove anything?
(Cacher) Si vous passez votre souris sur l'icone de l'abonnement d'un joueur, une infobulle avec ses principaux détails sera affichée. (pauloaguia) (Montrer toutes les astuces)