BrainKing - Forums de discussion (Politics)

Modérateur: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Pion.

Mode: Tout le monde peut poster

10. Octobre 2009, 02:15:27

Papa Zoom

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Even Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D is disappointed with Obama getting the Prize. For him to be against the Prize going to Obama speaks volumes. Hill likes Obama and is just a tad short of being a cheerleader for him.

The Prize should be renamed to The Joke.

10. Octobre 2009, 02:19:35

Mort

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Sujet: Re: Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D

Artful Dodger: Doesn't he work for Fox now??

10. Octobre 2009, 02:22:57

Papa Zoom

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Sujet: Re: Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D

(V): I love this comment: Obama getting the Nobel for his international groveling is comparable
to Nevile Chamberlain having received it (which he didn't) for signing
Britain over to the Nazis with the stroke of a pen

10. Octobre 2009, 14:11:15

Mort

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Sujet: Re: Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D

Artful Dodger:

Chamberlain didn't sign over the UK to the Nazi's... whoever made that comment is deranged. He sought to overt a conflict with Germany, seeing as at that time we were not ready for a war. It didn't work.

Is the teaching of European history of that time so bad in the USA. or is the comment maker so off the mark his head is in another galaxy??

10. Octobre 2009, 17:51:51

Papa Zoom

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Sujet: Re: Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D

(V): Chamberlin was a fool and history has proven that. He took the wimpy way out. History has shown over and over that when it comes to thugs, diplomacy doesn't work. Show us where it has. But brute force does work. Germany was toppled that way as was Japan. Hitler could have been stopped early if the governments weren't so wimpy about war.

10. Octobre 2009, 20:23:29

Mort

ses messages postés | suivre le fil | lien

Sujet: Re: Dr., Lamont Hill, PH.D

Artful Dodger: So... you are saying that if the USA had gottened involved before 1941 we'd won the war quicker? And if you knew history, you'd know that no European government could stop Hitler, none had the military forces to stop him. That's basic history and I'm surprised you do not know that. Even Russia only stopped Hitler through it's generals January and February.. a well known fact here. I guess USA teaching is not as good regarding WWII.. that's something you need to address.

"I've noticed that when your arguments are weak, you always resort to claiming things that were never said."

I never said it was said, I was asking if you accepted such a statement.. most sane people do see a question.

as for brute force... Ghandi beat the British Empire by non violent protest.. In certain respects.. wasn't that Christ's message. Or did you miss that part???

Yes.. I asked a question!!