 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Pion. Mode: Tout le monde peut poster
18. Juillet 2010, 21:04:01 If Mark Williams had made his comments in the UK. He'd be charged with Racism and/or racist comments. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:07:36 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: It is in the UK.. a criminal offence. The police would be charging him.. no need for civil action. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:09:22 Sujet: Re: (V): Canada too 18. Juillet 2010, 21:12:36 Sujet: Re: Jim Dandy: I'd imagine most if not all Commonwealth countries have the same regulations.  18. Juillet 2010, 21:17:19 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: The Racial Discrimination act came into force in 1976. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:25:02 Sujet: Re: modifié par The Col (18. Juillet 2010, 21:25:31) (V): The problem I have with laws against racism, and anti semetism is, it doesn't change minds, it just pushes them underground, where they fester. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:32:36 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: and like a kettle, it sometimes boils over.I believe in freedom of speech, not freedom of stupidity 18. Juillet 2010, 21:34:19 Sujet: Re:  Jim Dandy: Who determines what's stupid? Can YOU determine it objectively? 18. Juillet 2010, 21:37:25 Sujet: Re: Artful Dodger: I wouldn't use the word "stupid" if I was filing a legal brief, but you get the gist 18. Juillet 2010, 21:39:04 Sujet: Re: Jim Dandy: No, I don't get the gist of it. You used the word stupid. Upon what standard would you deny free speech? 18. Juillet 2010, 21:42:03 Sujet: Re: Artful Dodger: it's my lazy sunday afternoon,I would do the topic an injustice to tackle it to your standards,and besides, you don't pay enough  18. Juillet 2010, 21:43:16 Sujet: Re: Jim Dandy:  fair enough. I have to run anyway. Have a great sunday.18. Juillet 2010, 21:54:28 Sujet: Re:The problem I have with laws against racism, and anti semetism is, it doesn't change minds, it just pushes them underground, where they fester. Jim Dandy: True.. it can. Yet at the same time for those who openly commit acts it saves time in the courts. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:14:10 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: Maybe that's why when I read that letter I am appalled.In Canada it would be considered a no brainer in regards to the letter being racist. 18. Juillet 2010, 21:24:46 Sujet: Re: Jim Dandy: You dont REALLY have free speech in Canada |
Date et heure
Amis en ligne
Forums favoris
Associations
Astuce du jour
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, tous droits réservés Retour en haut |