The Usurper:If I'm insulting and tiresome (isn't that insulting to say that???) then perhaps you can just ignore me. 

Artful Dodger: I would prefer to look past your insults and tiresomeness to get to the heart of your objections, if I can, so that I can respond to them. :o)

The Usurper: I have just one question.......aren't you the same Ursurper that tried and nearly succeeded in bringing havoc to this site a few years ago with your "crap" with the TNP = take no prisoners rubbish and all the "taking" over of all games?

How do you expect to be someone who is considered creditable after all that rubbish. If you weren't the instigator then you were one of the leaders....

CCP is something anybody can do and I ask for YOU to prove what you are saying about the holocaust, 911, and anyother thing you are debating.

Is it me or are you trying to force your opinions on us as you have been known to do in the past?

Bernice: He has the right to voice his opinions on matters he find important to him.  And many people don't know about the KM group so it's not relevant to them.  Maybe awsome and a few others share his interest in 911 and if so, they can discuss it and debate it all they want.  I'll stay out of it as I've made my thoughts clear on the matter and there is nothing else to say.

Artful Dodger: no perhaps they dont know about the KM group....true.....

and if they want to keep 911 alive and debating something that will outlive all of us well ..do so I guess.

He has his rights to voice them but it gets a bit mundane and same ole same ole when it is the same ole same ole......oh well

Bernice:Kennedy was killed in 63 and they are still arguing about the facts of his assassination.  It will never end.  I suspect the same will be true of 911.  No matter how much is said, and even if an independent investigation were conducted, unless the results match the conspiracy theorists agenda, they will not be satisfied.  Said another way, unless the world agrees with their point of view, they will continue to press on ad nauseum. 

Artful Dodger: I wonder what the theories will be about the fires that are burning good Australian residents to death will be. I guess it could be taken as terrorists but why do it in the wooded areas (forests) do it in the cities where more people will cop it. Whole towns are burned and gone, small places with only a few hundred residents....cities with hundreds of thousands would have been more sense if it had of been terroristic. IMO

Bernice:  Great, you ask me a question and now I have to answer so now I'm up to 20 posts for today and that means I'm still over 50 percent!  Oh well, now that I'm here, I have an answer.

You see, the Australian government set those fires.  The current theory is that the fires were set deliberately but the "who" isn't known.  Likely it was secret government operatives with orders coming from the highest branch of the military.  The reason?  Unknown at this point.  But like all good conspiracies, we'll just keep digging until we get to the bottom and find the "truth" (or find some reasonable explanation that we can adopt--which ever comes first).  And like all those committed conspiracy theorists, we will explain away any and all official explanations and only accept those explanations that support our conspiratorial views.

Or something like that.  ;) 

Tuesday: I wish to God I had your wit.

Tuesday: lol. I'll bet.

Tuesday:

and I love what Awesome said. Amen. :)

Amen??? Really???

I can agree that a good moderator should be like a good umpire, and not be noticed or become more of the story than the story itself....

But AD has not actually even moderated one single post... how could he, as a moderator, be any less intrusive????

Typical liberal mindset, really.... ignore facts, logic and any common sense!

...and dont come back to me complaining that I say everything is a liberal blah blah blah... you put an "amen" to what awesome said, yet what he said actually makes no sense at all when you apply facts and logic and common sense to it, same with 90% of liberal arguments

I haavent heard one liberal on here before the election say anything other than "Obama is for change" or some other tiresome blah, nothing ever of any substance, but why not?

Because you dont even know what that change is meant to be..... if anyone would at least come out and say it, say "I vote democrat because I think the best thing for this country is for the government to take as much money from its citizens as they need to do everything for us and to control our lives in every way possible, and Navcy Pelosi and harry reid know more about what is best for me than i do, that is what I think is best for our country"...

Well, I could respect that, and I would at least know that you have put some though into it, and you have some ideals etc....

But when you "Amen" an asinine statement, and vote for some fantasy changes, well, thats liberalism in a nut (case) shell

Bernice:

I wonder what the theories will be about the fires that are burning good Australian residents to death will be.

Thats an easy one for me... its the do good greenies to blame for this one