Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Cavalier.
"the ideal form of the last rounds should be 1-4 3-2 or 1-8 5-4 3-6 7-2."
This is from the notes blog, and has been in practice from quite some time, but I have never thought it made any sense. You can have the top players meet in the final round (in theory), but why should the second-highest rated player get the bottom slot? Rather, it could be:
1-3 2-4 or 1-4 2-3 for 4 players, and 1-5 3-7 2-6 4-8,
which would still permit the top two seeds to meet in the "finale"
Fencer, Pioneer54, volant and joshi tm: Could we have the choice of all 3. Random could be default, then the way it is now and also the way Pioneer has it (1-5 3-7 2-6 4-8) which is fairer and the one i think would be me popular
(Cacher) Vous êtes d'humeur de jouer une partie rapide qui est garantie d'être finie dans les 2 heures? Créez une nouvelle partie de votre choix, choisissez le Temps pour la partie et réglez le Temps à 0 jour/1 heure, Incrément à 0 jour/ 0heure et la Limite à 0 jour/ 1 heure. (TeamBundy) (Montrer toutes les astuces)