Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Véčet klobu na mloveni
Néni tě dovoleny datlovat do toďteho klobo. Abes mohl datlovat do toďteho klobo, mosiš mit némiň členstvi Brain pinčl.
Bernice: Yes, the article is suppositional in the same way that the objection is suppositional. The objection runs thus:
Suppose 9/11 was a U.S. government conspiracy. How, then, could so many people be kept quiet? Or, why has no one come forward?
The article then asks (again supposing for the sake of argument that 9/11 was a U.S. conspiracy), is this objection a reasonable one?
Yet, although the question itself is suppositional, nevertheless the article does provide relevant evidence to back up his assertion that such a cover-up is possible, nor is it unprecedented.
Bernice:I don't mind an investigation (another one) but the thing is, the conspiracy guys have already drawn their conclusions. They have already figured it all out. They aren't simply asking questions, they are stating things as facts and conclusions. I'm not being told to "consider this" or that but I'm being told, "believe this" or that. And what a lot of these conspiracy fold do is to pound you with a huge amount of information over and over and over again. I guess they want to wear down one's resistance or something. For me it's simple: Give me something solid. Conjecture isn't proof. Questions or doubt isn't proof. I don't just want the smoking gun, I wanna see the gun and then talk tot he guy who pulled the trigger. They have nothing but theory - all day long.
That and the fact that on the one hand they call Bush an complete idiot, and then they turn around and treat him like he's a mastermind genius when it comes to pulling off the impossible! Wow!
Oh and Obama must be in on it too. And all of congress. And on and on and on.
(do skréše) Jak chceš vlitnót do špilo se špilošem, keré bode asi tak dobré jak te, možeš zvolet vežadované rozsah BKR v novy nabidce ke špilo. Potem nikdo, kdo do rozsaho nepasoje, toďto nabidko ani neovidi. (Katechka) (okázat šecke vechetávke)