Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321   > >>
26. Luglio 2006, 01:39:16
Vikings 
Argomento: Re:
Chaosu: you cannot possibly win or advance any farther in that tournament, if you send Fencer a pm and ask him nicely, he will probably release you from that tournament so you can join another one

26. Luglio 2006, 01:32:38
Chaosu 
I am in a turney for over half year, what about option 'maximum time for round' or something...

(bad idea but i am really stuck!)

25. Luglio 2006, 23:12:37
gambler104 
Argomento: Re:
Baked Alaskan: I agree with you completely.

25. Luglio 2006, 22:43:07
Baked Alaskan 
Argomento: Re:
gambler104:
Before this happens, tournaments need to be fixed. The current system isnt really practical.
Tournys need to be round robin style till the end.  Having 3 or 4 winners for a tourney IS NOT a tourney  LOL
Should only be 1 winner per tourney..





25. Luglio 2006, 22:27:32
gambler104 
Argomento: Re:
Hrqls: Here's an idea to reward the top players. Have a brain system for winning tournaments. Maybe 20 brains for winning a tournament with 5 or fewer players and 50 for one with 6-10. And you could keep increasing it. And then have a set limit on number of tournaments that could count for this per month.

25. Luglio 2006, 11:54:56
Vikings 
Argomento: Re: suspended?
Fencer: they seem to b e fine now, thanks

25. Luglio 2006, 08:12:39
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: suspended?
Vikings: That seems to be a small bug in the script instead. I'll check.

25. Luglio 2006, 02:29:11
Vikings 
Argomento: suspended?
Fencer, it appears that the game time for ponds have been suspended, I'm showing some games that should have gone to the next round 2 hours ago

24. Luglio 2006, 21:05:07
Kili 
Argomento: Re:Was that the reason for.....
Gentlegiant101: I just exposed a simple question. About your history, i inform you the time conditions of your game were 7 days for all it without weekends, so you lost this game because you spent all your time before of the end of it. 

24. Luglio 2006, 20:05:55
Chaosu 
I have tried international wire transfer (enabling this option costs as much as premium account in my fathers bank) and I already told You about my problems personally Fencer, You suggested connections with Czech and I told You that if this will be only way... but I got tired and now, when I am back there is other solution so... : )

24. Luglio 2006, 19:57:27
Gentlegiant101 
Argomento: Re:Was that the reason for.....
Matarilevich: the time out message and "loss of game message I received this morning at 9.45 Quebec,Canada time despite the fact my last play was made just hours earlier and opponents only minutes later. And to avoid excessive debate over timezones there is the added written info that Sunday (yesterday) is a weekend day along with the preceding Saturday. for this game whose id is below.
I am fully aware that the more serious members are unappreciative of those members who "time out" without valid reason.And it bothers me that this impression is going to be possibly created by an inanimate object. (number1760232)
PS: I am epileptic and due to my height 6 feet seven inches I am at a higher risk of getting back sprains and inflammations. if such be my experiences of a given moment Please be informed that I will let the games "time out". Apart from that I enjoy the games too much to let them "time out".

24. Luglio 2006, 19:02:57
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Chaosu: Have you tried the international wire transfer? I've already received payments from Iran, South Africa, China, Russia and many other countries using this way, so I am sure it would work for Poland as well. Not to mention it is a direct neighbor of Czech Republic, so you can easily cross the border and sent the money locally.

24. Luglio 2006, 18:50:30
Chaosu 
You may not belive but it is much harder to pay premium account here from Poland thatn from other countries, see how many PL players already have one? Only Dein asaik and he have multiaccounts anyway because he just play good, 40 games was way too less for him and he also play on all other sites like it : ) Thats why I am searching for other ways, too late for place 1-5 (i wasn't playing for long until 20 july) but we will see.

24. Luglio 2006, 18:42:57
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
King Reza: It's a dark green light. Which means "all right, do what you want to do, but you are being watched".

24. Luglio 2006, 18:39:21
King Reza 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer:Here comes the green light from Fen ..., Fence ..., Fencer

24. Luglio 2006, 18:37:48
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Chaosu: You can try what you are capable of and we'll see.

24. Luglio 2006, 18:26:14
alanback 
Fen-Fen Fencer? Ah, that explains a lot!

24. Luglio 2006, 18:22:48
King Reza 
Argomento: Re:
Chaosu:I personally don't mind!  Do what you want, but it's not me who has to give you the green light.  There's a Fen ...., Fence ......, Fencer here who is in charge!

24. Luglio 2006, 18:02:01
Chaosu 
Lets say I would creat multigame-match so I would not spam statistics/my account with many games.

24. Luglio 2006, 17:47:13
Chaosu 
Do anyone will mind me my style of playing if i will play with brother from same house (ip) just to get action points?

24. Luglio 2006, 01:16:55
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer:  Welcome Back  ;)  I might change my hat.

hehehe

24. Luglio 2006, 01:09:48
skipinnz 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: Hope you and Liquid had a nice holiday :o)

23. Luglio 2006, 20:56:35
Fencer 
I am back from holidays and so is Liquid. Starting the game time now.

23. Luglio 2006, 14:20:16
Kili 
Argomento: Re:
King Reza: Since Friday the time control is suspended

23. Luglio 2006, 13:54:53
King Reza 
Argomento: Re:
Matarilevich:I remember there used to be a warning message in red, saying that the game time was suspended.  But I cannot see it anymore.  Have you forgotten to put it there Fencer, or am I missing it somehow?

23. Luglio 2006, 13:43:10
Kili 
When will the time control work again?

22. Luglio 2006, 20:21:14
Rose 
Argomento: Re:
Erinity: Wow, I'm at a loss as to what to tell you. I checked my boat games and all is well. Wish I was more help

22. Luglio 2006, 20:15:03
Erinity 
I always use firefox. My ludo and gammon games are moving about twice as fast as the boat ones.

22. Luglio 2006, 20:14:06
Rose 
Argomento: Re: boat games
Erinity: What browser do you use? I find that in IE some games are soo slow.. My ludo games were super slow until I started using firefox. now it's like night and day for speed

22. Luglio 2006, 20:04:03
Erinity 
Argomento: boat games
is anyone else finding all battleboat games running extremely slower than other games?

22. Luglio 2006, 19:04:15
Mort 

22. Luglio 2006, 19:03:09
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: Conversation ready for deletion...
Brian1971: Silly man, of course I don't know you. All I know is that you've chosen to make judgements about certain people and look down your nose at their choices in life. Maybe you're a great guy but from what you've shown here I find that I have no wish to know you. It's a shame that you didn't choose to stay in your "normal" life away from the "'puter" in the first place. That way you wouldn't have to give a hollow LMAO to cover your embarrassment.

22. Luglio 2006, 18:51:45
Brian1971 
Argomento: Re: Conversation ready for deletion...
playBunny: LMAO. Just goes to show you dont know me at all. Well time to go resume my normal life away from the 'puter.

22. Luglio 2006, 18:49:37
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: Conversation ready for deletion...
Brian1971: See what I mean about a superiority complex? You assume that responding to idiots on this board implies a personal interest in them. Nope. I just don't suffer fools gladly. I couldn't care two hoots about you personally.

22. Luglio 2006, 18:45:33
Brian1971 
Argomento: Re: outage=panic
playBunny: I was busy managing a multi-million dollar restaurant. I find it fascinating that you have taken personal interest in me. It is almost like you have no interests in your personal life to take care of. I am sure that cant be the case now can it?

22. Luglio 2006, 18:41:17
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: outage=panic
Brian1971: I was working too. Working on my sympathy for your superiority complex. Sadly I didn't get very far. :-(

22. Luglio 2006, 18:31:23
Adaptable Ali 
Argomento: Re: outage=panic
Brian1971: I actually got an early night

22. Luglio 2006, 18:30:30
Brian1971 
Argomento: outage=panic
No Brainking for a few hours? What did some people do? I was working.

22. Luglio 2006, 15:02:44
Skittles 
Argomento: Re: Outage
playBunny: Yeah it was about 8:15pm here when it went down cuz I'm 6hrs behind London. I was sound asleep at 12:30am tho lol

22. Luglio 2006, 14:53:29
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: Outage
Skittles: It was down from 2:15am until 6:30am here in London.

22. Luglio 2006, 14:28:54
Skittles 
Argomento: Re: Outage
Rose: It was down last night, have no idea for how long, at least 2 hours but then I went on to bed.

You really should get that crystal ball fixed once!!!

22. Luglio 2006, 12:59:33
Rose 
Argomento: Outage
Was the site down for us in North American again? It was hours I take it? I had a ton of emails from total strangers asking me why it was down. My crystal ball was on the fritz so I had no answers.

22. Luglio 2006, 12:32:25
An Cat Dubh 
Argomento: Mancala
How about it?

22. Luglio 2006, 02:28:09
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: Finally
alanback: LOL! ;-P

22. Luglio 2006, 02:20:38
Walter Montego 
Argomento: Re: Finally
alanback: :) I'm still chucklin'

22. Luglio 2006, 02:14:25
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Finally
playBunny: I always think I'm looking at your stern when I see your face ;-)

22. Luglio 2006, 01:54:31
playBunny 
Argomento: Re: Finally
srnity: Lolol. Shhhh, I'm putting on my "stern face". ;-)

22. Luglio 2006, 00:33:32
srnity 
Argomento: Re: Finally
Modificato da srnity (22. Luglio 2006, 00:35:38)
playBunny: Wow - somebody should check their blood pressure...And to those of you who actually manage to have the time to play continuously 24/7 for "Action Points" - what's the secret to finding that kind of time, I wanna play too

21. Luglio 2006, 23:18:18
playBunny 
Argomento: Finally
Brian1971: "Before jumping on me you should read my entire post. IF people are here every hour, every minute of the day they need a life."

That is not a conditional statement and the IF, even in capitals, doesn't change it from a judgemental declaration.

"People who are here every hour, every minute of the day, need a life."

It's insulting and well worth jumping on you for.

Not only is it insulting but it's also naive. Have you ever seen a dance marathon? People who dance for hours until the last one's dropped? They have chosen to be in a competition that can be won only by constant, relentless attendance and attention, plus amazing endurance. They have a life and the've chosen to spend part of it in the competition.

Similarly this is a competition situation here. And while relentless attendance is not compulsory, nor an absolute neccesity, it does convey an advantage. That people have chosen to spend this part of their life engaged in such a pursuit of glory is not an indication that they have no life but that they are fitting this competition into their life. Your insults show lack of appreciation both socially and intellectually.

21. Luglio 2006, 23:15:56
playBunny 
Brian1971: "This way people who play over a thousand games at a time dont drown out players who play much fewer games."

This is another point that you haven't understood. Look at the Pawns competition and be aware that almost 100% of thoise points are single points for non-tournament games. In the Rooks competition something like 80-90% are tournament points which score double. So multiply the Pawn scores by 2 and compare the lists.

And then try and explain how Pawns with 20 games maximum are far, far from being "drowned out" by Rooks having over 1000 games??

You'll notice that there are no Knights in the entire Rooks competition. Oops, I shouldn't have said Rooks there, because it's for non-Pawns. Why no Knights? Because they don't have the 100s of games and they don't get many doubled points from tournament games, Knights are severely limited (crippled, in terms of the competition) in the number of these that they can have.

But that's not quite true. A Knight with a fast connection and the willingness to compete (ie, put in the time) could, with the techniques that the Pawns use, beat the Rooks and win a prize.

And that would apply to anyone in these ranges of number of games that you've proposed. It's not only numbers of simultaneous games, it's turnover.

<< <   312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio