Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336   > >>
11. Giugno 2006, 18:47:37
Adaptable Ali 
Argomento: Re:
baddessi: Ok, it seems to be ok now, i just shut the site down. Thanks for your help anyway

11. Giugno 2006, 18:45:48
baddessi 
Argomento: Re:
WatfordFC: hmmm..well my guess is that it's not your hard drive. I'm having the same trouble..thought it was my cable internet...the pages seems to load slow and you get a blank page between the loads?

11. Giugno 2006, 18:44:25
Adaptable Ali 
Argomento: Re:
baddessi: Its a brand new hard drive only got in all installed today :o(

11. Giugno 2006, 18:36:02
baddessi 
Argomento: Re:
WatfordFC: have you tried cleaning your cookies and internet history?

11. Giugno 2006, 18:34:25
Adaptable Ali 
Not sure if i am on the right board for this one, but i will try anyway.



When i take a move in a game and i click "move" to go to the next
game,i get a completely blank page. Is anybody else having the same
problem? Thanks.

11. Giugno 2006, 18:31:45
baddessi 
Argomento: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: think of it as a summer vacation. Isn't everyone entitled to vacation, especially when they cover the boards in their absence?

11. Giugno 2006, 18:21:00
Czuch 
Argomento: Re:
gogul: Point is that it doesnt matter where he is, pawns are not allowed to be board moderators, and especially ones who are not even here for a month.....

11. Giugno 2006, 18:05:13
Chimera 
Argomento: Re:
WatfordFC:

11. Giugno 2006, 16:58:29
baddessi 
Argomento: Re:
WatfordFC: Welcome back!

11. Giugno 2006, 16:57:18
baddessi 
Argomento: Re:
Rose: actually, I read that this is a temporary situation. Reza posted somewhere on here that his membership is pending while he waits, and even on his board posted that he assigned Walter there in his place for now. Just to let you know : )

11. Giugno 2006, 16:53:33
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: What´s your point? Wont Reza be back after a month or so?

11. Giugno 2006, 16:42:58
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
WatfordFC:

11. Giugno 2006, 15:52:39
Adaptable Ali 

11. Giugno 2006, 15:50:45
Rose 
Argomento: Re:
Marfitalu: No, he isnt wrong. It is an oversite. It would be impossible to spend every day watching every board, every board moderator to see if they are still members. The members that go down to pawns should alert of us that I suppose.
Now that everyone is aware of it it will be corrected.

11. Giugno 2006, 15:50:41
Czuch 
Argomento: Re:
Marfitalu:

11. Giugno 2006, 15:39:55
Czuch 
I thought pawns were not allowed to moderate public discussion boards?

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=117

10. Giugno 2006, 22:13:48
Czuch 
Argomento: Re: Time and information
alanback: The fact that we can never buy more time is what makes it so valuable...

10. Giugno 2006, 21:54:06
alanback 
Argomento: Time and information
I must respectfully differ. A commodity is a substance that is standardized; one unit is like any other unit, which enables commodities to be traded in public markets at quoted prices. To be sure, some information is a commodity; that information which is freely available, now more than ever due to the internet. However, the most valuable information is that which is unique and not generally available; that is what can be sold at a premium price. That is why there are laws protecting "intellectual property". Therefore, while commodity information no doubt has value, it is not particularly valuable; and the most valuable information is not a commodity at all.

Time could be regarded as a commodity, since many of us sell our time at fixed prices, albeit over a wide price range. Few if any of us are able to sell our time at the price we choose; the price is fixed by market forces.

Yet the most important aspect of time is fundamentally not really a commodity at all. While we can buy the time of others, we can never buy more time for ourselves. And the most profound spiritual traditions regard time as only an illusion.

10. Giugno 2006, 16:00:48
Czuch 
Argomento: Re:
BerniceC: ahhhh, you are correct, of course! Maybe time is a commodity as well then?

10. Giugno 2006, 02:51:56
Bernice 
Argomento: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Fencer said commodity and you are referring to assets...there is a difference I believe LOL.....sorry I know Im splitting hairs LOL

9. Giugno 2006, 18:27:49
Czuch 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: What about time? Time is my most valuable asset!

9. Giugno 2006, 18:19:17
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Chicago Bulls: INFORMATION is the most valuable commodity in the world.

9. Giugno 2006, 17:49:18
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: And what you or we would gain from that....?

9. Giugno 2006, 17:30:26
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Yes, I can look at the database. But I could make a table of most popular boards, based on this data. Not a bad idea.

9. Giugno 2006, 11:34:55
Czuch 
Is there a way to find out how many people keep a particular discussion board on their list of favorites?

8. Giugno 2006, 23:40:23
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
Chicago Bulls: One bit of information I didn't give you was that there was an error in the javascript console log. This was what convinced me it was a scripting problem, and since the update checker is a javascript app, I attributed the problem to it.

8. Giugno 2006, 19:57:28
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
alanback: I think the problem was associated with the page update checker extension. I uninstalled that, and the site is now functioning properly in Mozilla.

I don't think it's this the problem. I had the same problems from time to time the last 20 hours and for only 10-80 seconds each time. With both Firefox and IE....

8. Giugno 2006, 19:49:15
nabla 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
alanback: I have that from time to time, always thought it happened when the site was slow (I know that Mozilla is very impatient when he doesn't get a quick enough response).

8. Giugno 2006, 19:28:50
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
Czuch Chuckers: I think the problem was associated with the page update checker extension. I uninstalled that, and the site is now functioning properly in Mozilla.

8. Giugno 2006, 18:59:53
Czuch 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
alanback: no problems for me on mozilla too. Try clearing you cookies and cache etc?

8. Giugno 2006, 18:59:05
Summertop 
Argomento: Re: Trouble with the site?
alanback: I am using Mozilla Firefox. I am NOT having any problems. BK does seem a bit slower today. though.

8. Giugno 2006, 18:54:13
alanback 
Argomento: Trouble with the site?
Is anyone else having trouble with the links here? I have been experiencing a lot of situations where the browser just goes to a blank screen and stays there.  This happens when I log in and when I submit a move, which implies to me it's some kind of a script problem.  When I return to the site I find that I am logged in and that my move was made; I just never got to the page that follows those actions.  It also only happens when I am using Mozilla, not with IE.

8. Giugno 2006, 17:04:23
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Summertop & Chicago Bulls: If we can´t we´ll have to move to the pit, ..!#?

8. Giugno 2006, 16:34:44
Summertop 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Chicago Bulls and gogul, This sounds like a fun debate in the Debate Club. If you take it there, I will follow.

8. Giugno 2006, 05:51:34
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da gogul (8. Giugno 2006, 10:14:42)
Chicago Bulls: It was a general thought and had nothing to do with what you´ve said and I´m not offended in any way. I felt upset when someone complains the free speech for him self and uses it to harm others. Again, nothing personal. And regarding to the public boards I just wouldn´t say avoiding "bad" words is the "only" guidance (again not what you´ve claimed). I think probably as you do there are no "bad" words, so I would talk about "offensive" words which I can´t know or can´t be sure in advance if they do or not. I use some of them as well if I´m with friends in the pub or whatever, as I avoid them in other situations...

8. Giugno 2006, 01:56:02
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
gogul: I didn't say anything against that! I just said that words should not be considered as harmful in any way....
Of course if some consider them as harmful, then in this spirit of brotherhood i simply retreat....

8. Giugno 2006, 01:26:26
gogul 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Chicago Bulls: If you refer to the freedom of speech consider also: All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. ;)

8. Giugno 2006, 01:14:08
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Chicago Bulls (8. Giugno 2006, 01:14:44)
Rose: Oh, OK no problem, i just noticed that, so i've said that....
So as a general guidance i should avoid posting words considered as "bad", right?

8. Giugno 2006, 01:10:12
Rose 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Chicago Bulls: We can't mod Fencer. A note was sent to him to ask him to 'mod' his own post!

8. Giugno 2006, 01:04:49
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Re: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Chicago Bulls (8. Giugno 2006, 01:08:19)
Czuch Chuckers: .
.
.
Personally i'm against of any try of putting limits to the freedom of speech and i consider all tries from anyone to restrict the used vocabulary to something known as more "appropriate", as hypocritical.....
How can some words make any harm?
Of course your mileage may vary and i guess it varies, as almost all people i know disagree with me.....


A tip to moderation: You removed all "bad" words except one case: Fencer's case.

8. Giugno 2006, 01:00:00
Peón Libre 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Peón Libre (8. Giugno 2006, 01:01:34)
Czuch Chuckers: Don't ask me. I'm just a Pawn. I don't set policy, and I didn't choose the title of this thread. But it may be worth noting that your example was profane, while the present case is merely vulgar.

8. Giugno 2006, 00:53:03
Czuch 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Czuch (8. Giugno 2006, 01:01:09)
KotDB: **** Is that an acceptable term on this site? I said **** in a private fellowship and it was moderated, and this is a very public board with many sensitive people and children reading it! Where is the outrage? Where is the protection?

8. Giugno 2006, 00:45:13
Peón Libre 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Peón Libre (8. Giugno 2006, 01:00:36)
Chicago Bulls: That's where I thought it would be, but sadly, it's not there. Ah, well.

8. Giugno 2006, 00:42:52
pauloaguia 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da pauloaguia (8. Giugno 2006, 01:00:14)
pauloaguia: Forget my posts... I was on the wrong thread :P

8. Giugno 2006, 00:42:14
pauloaguia 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da pauloaguia (8. Giugno 2006, 00:59:47)
KotDB: (of course, you must first have a blocked user to change the descrption to)

8. Giugno 2006, 00:41:32
Chicago Bulls 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Chicago Bulls (8. Giugno 2006, 00:59:23)
KotDB: .
.
.
Go here: Dark Chess and if at the top of the screen there isn't an obvious option of "Export PGN to a zip file" then i guess it is for paying members only.....

Fencer 2 questions:
So are all the Gothic Chess games available to give them to me....?
Does the exported PGN of one game, for example Chess, includes the games that have been private....?

8. Giugno 2006, 00:41:12
pauloaguia 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da pauloaguia (8. Giugno 2006, 00:58:55)
KotDB: On your BlockedUsers page, over the list of blocked users you have an option to change the description to one of them.

8. Giugno 2006, 00:22:42
Peón Libre 
Argomento: Fencer did it again!
Modificato da Peón Libre (8. Giugno 2006, 00:58:31)
Chicago Bulls: This sounds like a very useful feature, but I can't find it anywhere. Is it for paying members only, or am I looking only in the wrong places?

7. Giugno 2006, 21:34:21
SharonV 
Argomento: Re: emoticons
BIG BAD WOLF:

Thanks.
sharon

7. Giugno 2006, 21:09:24
coan.net 
Argomento: Re: emoticons
SharonV: Pawns can not use them, only knights & above.

<< <   327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio