Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96   > >>
16. Dicembre 2011, 17:46:12
joshi tm 
I see there are 100001 Brain King users now! Congratulations ;)

15. Dicembre 2011, 23:47:16
MadMonkey 
Argomento: Re:
Tanein: 99999

15. Dicembre 2011, 23:16:32
HelenaTanein 

15. Dicembre 2011, 15:02:41
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Curious about numbers
rod03801: That's because there used to be a function "delete user" 10 years ago. A couple of deleted accounts caused this difference.

15. Dicembre 2011, 14:50:16
rod03801 
Argomento: Curious about numbers
On the log in page, it says 99,997 registered players.
So, I thought that was neat, someone pretty soon, is going to be registered user # 100,000

However, when looking at the player list, as of right now, when I'm typing this, the most recent new user is user #100,103

I assumed it would match up. Just curious why it doesn't?

14. Dicembre 2011, 11:52:19
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
furbster: Hehe, yes.

14. Dicembre 2011, 11:51:35
furbster 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: 5? hehe

14. Dicembre 2011, 08:44:42
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
furbster: 6 codes left.

9. Dicembre 2011, 12:29:38
furbster 
RED CODE- the last 3 have been red actually!

6. Dicembre 2011, 22:59:47
aaru 
Argomento: Re:

6. Dicembre 2011, 21:09:09
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
Gabriel Almeida: A betting shop. How can bk be so out of date. I'd love to gain my membership by correct tips!

6. Dicembre 2011, 20:42:36
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: Yeah... I got a tournament to win!

6. Dicembre 2011, 19:55:16
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
furbster: Looks like it was stuck a couple of years ago. I will check it.

6. Dicembre 2011, 19:52:52
furbster 
whats happened here?
Adventure - I

6. Dicembre 2011, 19:52:29
gogul 
Argomento: Re:
rabbitoid: Why did you have to say this?

6. Dicembre 2011, 13:50:57
rabbitoid 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: Give a shout when it's down to 10 so we can all start to sing ten little indians

6. Dicembre 2011, 12:46:04
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
furbster: 12 left.

6. Dicembre 2011, 12:26:22
furbster 
another 2 red codes down, there can't be many more left now!

5. Dicembre 2011, 21:52:27
Bwild 
Argomento: Re: Totally nonrelevant number of the day
Gabriel Almeida: there will be that many multi nics in a week...maybe more! lol

5. Dicembre 2011, 21:42:48
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: Totally nonrelevant number of the day
happyjuggler0: 106 more for the "big number"!

5. Dicembre 2011, 20:55:10
happyjuggler0 
Argomento: Re: Totally nonrelevant number of the day
Gabriel Almeida: http://brainking.com/en/PlayerList?a=ap

In black letters a couple of lines above Fencer's name.

5. Dicembre 2011, 20:43:34
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: Totally nonrelevant number of the day
gogul: where can you (we) see it, gogul?

5. Dicembre 2011, 17:12:44
gogul 
Argomento: Totally nonrelevant number of the day
99892 registered players

5. Dicembre 2011, 16:45:39
Pedro Martínez 
Argomento: Re: thisbeme
pedestrian: Thanks, I can see it now.

Interesting, though, that you won't see him complaining about THAT here… he will complain about running out of time (claiming it's a bug), other people sending him unpleasant messages (claiming they are harassing him), and whatnot, but NOT about an obvious bug he must have noticed…

5. Dicembre 2011, 16:11:08
pedestrian 
Argomento: Re: thisbeme
Pedro Martínez: Fencer is checking it, see November 29th. Seems to have something to do with the light bulb action.

5. Dicembre 2011, 15:13:58
Pedro Martínez 
Argomento: thisbeme
Vacation days left: 7 days 20 hours

Now how is that possible?

5. Dicembre 2011, 01:51:39
Mélusine 
Argomento: Re:
happyjuggler0: Yes, sure. I was joking but I totally agree with you. This situation blocks the pawns.

5. Dicembre 2011, 01:46:58
happyjuggler0 
Argomento: Re:
Mélusine: I'm not the one playing in the tournament. Although "playing" is perhaps not the right word....

5. Dicembre 2011, 01:42:52
Mélusine 
happyjuggler0: Luck is with you : there's only one game between each opponent.

5. Dicembre 2011, 00:35:49
Aganju 
Hypercarefully!
Especially the first move!

5. Dicembre 2011, 00:18:37
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: auto vacation
happyjuggler0: No, it's not ridiculous, happyjuggler! Notice it is a "Hypergammon game". A move must be carefully studied!

4. Dicembre 2011, 10:27:45
lukulus 
Argomento: Re: auto vacation
happyjuggler0: Yes, it is ridiculous, but no one was forced to play in such conditions.

4. Dicembre 2011, 05:23:10
happyjuggler0 
Argomento: Re: auto vacation
Nothingness: I assume this is the tournament you are talking about:

Back*turnajek

It has a time control of 30 days per move. With weekend days, that is 6 weeks per move, so there is no reason for him to lose vacation days.

It is ridiculous to have a tournament with time controls that long....

4. Dicembre 2011, 05:02:25
Nothingness 
Argomento: auto vacation
I'm involved in a tournament where one individual has not made their fist move yet in over a month. They are on Auto vacation mode and their alloted amount of vacation has not gone down each day, it stays the same and they still have not even been logged in since October. is this a glitch? also does auto vacation ever deduct if i move in some games and not in others? if i have 30 days and i move in 3 of my 5 games will i still lose a day? since i did not move in those two games?

4. Dicembre 2011, 01:31:28
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: Ok, I think I figured out what I was doing wrong (in my thinking). It always went to an online player before because there were online players available for moves (like just now). Sorry about the bug report. I get it now.

3. Dicembre 2011, 20:50:42
Papa Zoom 
ok, so maybe I've just never noticed this before. If I have online players, and I choose one of those to start, it always goes to the next online player. And if I run out of online players, it goes to the main page. Then if I start playing off line players, it goes to the next offline. hmmm. I've never noticed it before but I'm usually zoning out and watching TV as I play.

3. Dicembre 2011, 18:57:52
Bwild 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger: if your hearing a squeak....turn up the stereo! lol

3. Dicembre 2011, 18:45:24
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: But this is the way it's always worked for me. I have my filter set to go to online opponents. It's ALWAYS gone to the main page when there is no online opponent. It NEVER has gone to the next available game. NEVER. Until now. And it doesn't do it in every case. The way it is filtering now is not the way it has filtered for me in the past. And IF it's supposed to go to the next game if the selected filter criteria isn't there, well that's not working consistently for me either. So either way, there's a problem. I tested this several times and sometimes I go to next game (when there is no online player) and other times back to the main page even though there are still several game in which for me to move.

3. Dicembre 2011, 18:38:51
rod03801 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da rod03801 (3. Dicembre 2011, 18:39:54)
Fencer: Personally, I think going to the Main Page would be more appropriate. That lets you know that the particular "filter" you chose, contains no more games in that "category".

I know it works that way with Move and go to Next Fischer clock game. When there are no more, it goes to the main page. I like that!

And if that means that particular choice is "broken" , PLEASE don't fix it!

3. Dicembre 2011, 17:24:28
Papa Zoom 
Like just now I moved in a game. And the only other game available is an off-line opponent. After submitting my move I was sent to my game page (as it usually does in that situation). Only lately has it gone to next game. And then not in all cases. So that only adds to my confusion.

3. Dicembre 2011, 17:22:17
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
Fencer: I'm confused. It's set to online opponent. I thought it was supposed to go back to the game page if no online opponent is available (sometimes this is exactly what it does.)

3. Dicembre 2011, 17:16:44
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger: That's how it is supposed to work. If no game is found, according to your filter, the first available game is selected instead.

3. Dicembre 2011, 16:37:17
Papa Zoom 
I wonder if anyone else is experiencing this problem. My game settings are set to send the next game to online opponents. If someone is online, after submitting the current move, the next online opponent game appears. All is good. But, if there is no online opponent, it still goes to the next game instead of just going to the game sheet. It's never done this before and just started a few days or so ago. Odd.

1. Dicembre 2011, 06:38:24
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
ScarletRose:

1. Dicembre 2011, 04:37:54
ScarletRose 
Argomento: Re:
Artful Dodger:  I can vouch for that! LOL

1. Dicembre 2011, 03:33:56
thisbeme 
Read the directions multiple times, could easily have meant every tournament had a prize!

1. Dicembre 2011, 03:04:54
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
rod03801: Read the directions first??? What? Are you crazy? We're guys. We don't do directions.

1. Dicembre 2011, 03:03:29
rod03801 
Argomento: Re:
thisbeme: People should be responsible for themselves. Read things before you sign up. The site itself shouldn't have to babysit anyone and decide for them what they do. The site can only (and should only) stop you from doing what you can't do that would be against the terms of your membership level.

1. Dicembre 2011, 02:52:39
thisbeme 
The is a difference between a knockout tournament that has started and a tournament that hasn't started.

I forgot what a pain being a pawn was!
When I started here I withdrew from a prize tour to play another prize tour and won it, only to find that I wasn't going to get the prize because the prize was over multiple games :( !
Multi tournament free prize events are a tease. Pawns shouldn't be allowed to enter events they can't win.

30. Novembre 2011, 23:12:56
happyjuggler0 
Argomento: Re: tournament removal
rod03801: You mean he won't be able to play in all 2700+ tournaments he signed up for? Whatever will he do?

<< <   87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio