 |
|
 TournamentsPlease use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments Team Tournaments Dec 2024 - Dark Battleboats 7 - Starts 6th Dec Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
<< < 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 > >> 24. Ottobre 2004, 20:28:13 Argomento: Re:prize tournaments from Universal Eyes Reminder to all there are two prize tournament for backgammon,with all games included,one for each fellowship and everyone is welcome needing more player in all games have a look and pick your preference so all games will have a tournament or as many as feasable.Thanks your friend Mike :o) 23. Ottobre 2004, 18:06:01  HOME needs the following number of players...
Jungle - 3 Cylinder chess - 3 Gothic chess - 2 Alquerque - 2 23. Ottobre 2004, 17:53:16 Argomento: Team Tournaments  I was looking through the team tournaments, and I seen 3 tournaments which will not have enough teams to start.
Those tournaments of less-popular games are: If you are able to play in team tournaments, and any of those games look interesting to you - Check with your fellowships to teams to join, or join a new fellowship looking for team members. Here are a few fellowships that I know of that are looking for players for these tournaments: If other fellowship are looking, please let us know. If you are a player, feel free to join. Hopefully we can get enough teams to start these tournaments! 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:11:45 But as Steve pointed out, it's already in motion 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:11:08 I think we can do without it since some ppl are misusing it 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:10:25 So that's what all the huffy is about LOL 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:07:12 apparently timing out is an emergency ;) 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:03:58 How does the auto vacation know it's an emergency LOL. 23. Ottobre 2004, 16:00:02 Argomento: Re: It is the auto vacation that is for "emergencies" Sky... If it is not an emergency then one can use the vacations normally. 23. Ottobre 2004, 15:41:57 I didn't know vacation time was for emergency's. 23. Ottobre 2004, 07:37:58 Argomento: Re: Come on Ug....RU flurting with me again? :)
I miss our debates. No, really... Sorry you had to agree with me. I must have been bored, to be so repetative. 23. Ottobre 2004, 05:42:15  I doubt "most" people are "tired of listening to steve whine"... You always do that. You feel a certain way, and try to make it sound like a majority feels the same, even though you have no idea, LJ... There is NO reason for Stevie to be banned! (not this time anyways.. LOL!) :-P 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:59:58 No, because you would obviously not be onsite :o) 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:59:37 Well, if you are using auto-vacation and you end up not having to go, none of your games should "time out", and therefore no vacation days should be used. 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:58:10 Argomento: So if I set vacation days up. Cause I may have to be gone with my daughter and for some reason I don't have to go, u say that is abuse? 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:57:18 Somehow I think it will be a no do it anyways 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:51:00 but who would keep the records though? Thats a lot of work for the players to do really 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:30:58 How would you know Ughaibu? 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:09:37 Argomento: Re: BTW up your pimple purple head 23. Ottobre 2004, 04:04:51 Anyway LJ
This was only a heated discusion. Nothing more, two sides getting their opinions across. Until you came on 23. Ottobre 2004, 03:44:37 Modificato da Stevie (23. Ottobre 2004, 03:51:50) I modified it to add flaming LMAO
I couldnt give two hoots if you are getting tired of me whinging. The only problem i have is I say what others think and dont say. So looks like its just me. But it isnt. Whereas the likes of you, you say what you think the boss man wants you to say. cant get much lower can you 23. Ottobre 2004, 03:33:55 23. Ottobre 2004, 03:32:11 Once more LJ shows his true self. nose covered in the brown stuff etc. Whats wrong?? you want rid of someone who shows you for what you are???
I see you signed on with both accounts LJ you should shut up and play both sets of games. ooopps sorry, you said its your wife momentarily didnt you before deleting the commenet LOL I guess your post below wont stay long either. 23. Ottobre 2004, 03:13:14 Argomento: Re: Stevie and others It is just not a right attitude. Once there is a feature which people do find useful from time to time, it should not be abolished just because some others abuse it. Such an attitude would lead, then, to a "tyranny of the abusers", because BK would be further developed with respect to preventing these from acting abusively and not with respect to helping us all to have a good gameplay.
Do you see my point ? 23. Ottobre 2004, 03:04:24 I dont think it is that tough to see... If you are away from the site, automatic vacation days to prevent time out is fine. there should be no limit to it, except for the amount of vacation time you have left. If you have logged into the site within 24 hours (or some specific amount of time) of a game being timed out, the Automatic vacation should not be turned on for you.
I think we all agree, it should not be used to add time to a game when a person is available to make a move. 23. Ottobre 2004, 02:31:21  I agree that auto vacation should not be allowed to be used on games if a person has signed into the account at any period , and even if it does kick in a maximum limit of 2 or 3 days should be allowed . 23. Ottobre 2004, 02:27:09 Thanks Loup :o)
The diference is BBW to set it manually means they have to go out of their way to do it. Whereas its easy to sit back and let an auto thing kick in 23. Ottobre 2004, 02:21:56 but the thing is, even without auto vacation, that same person can hold up the tournament for over a month. 23. Ottobre 2004, 02:20:20 hear hear. Finishing the tournament is the fun part. If you time out for whatever reason then enter the next one. It's not the end of the world. 23. Ottobre 2004, 02:18:57 Argomento: scooby and others Most of the time Stevie and I don't see things the same way. But on this auto vacation crap. I do have to say Stevie is saying most everything I think is right on it.
So on the 1 or 2 day tourney, if a person has not takin 1 vacation day all year they could hold a tourney to make it last for 1 turn over a month. Yes as it is now that the way the rules have it but is it really being a true sport about the game? ok puff back to my corner I pop. :o{P 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:51:53 LMAO your loss ;oÞ 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:49:33 I dont want to talk to you. Ive been warned things 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:44:42 Scooby, Im sure youll be told..."get a membership" so you can have more games etc. But thats not the answer is it ;o)LOL 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:42:19 especially annoying when its against a pawn :( It would only need 1 player to do this and hold up a tournament we are in for ex. Or 20 players to do it and we have no games to play 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:16:59 hence..the words abused upchuck
but i dont think its worth mentioning anymore cos obviously the managements minds are made up 23. Ottobre 2004, 01:03:07 One point not yet mentioned (I think) is that these people are not away with an emergency, they are here...
I like auto vacations too, for emergency use. But maybe it could be set to only work if a player is not on the site? If they are here and purposly not playing games that are due to time out, the auto vacation should not be kicked in. Personally, I dont think any vacation days should be valid if the person is on site. If you can accept a 5 day limit game, and you are able to get on site, you should have to play your games at that limit, period. 22. Ottobre 2004, 20:22:26 and of course you are right ;o)
nice when goal posts allways move isnt it :o( 22. Ottobre 2004, 20:21:12 I've never said I have a great memory! Feature requests is just that. People suggest things, Fencer & Liquid add what they like. I don't remember many objections if this was mentioned at features? I could be wrong though so don't jump on me for that one! I think most people would be glad of this if they ever needed to fall back on auto-vation. As was said earlier, for the majority its a great addition. Of course there are always a few who will abuse it, as with anything. But overall, it will benefit most people. 22. Ottobre 2004, 20:17:42 On the other hand, won't the auto-vacation feature make players more willing to play 1-day-per-move games, hence resulting in faster game play? 22. Ottobre 2004, 20:15:50 nope, i remember the suggestions made on feature board 22. Ottobre 2004, 20:15:05 Yes, a chosen few wanted it. Fencer and Liquid. And last time I looked, they don't have to ask anyone before adding every small detail to their site! << < 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 > >> |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |