Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Argomento: I suggest removing the misfeature Hannelore from moderating General Chat
she lies impudently about having sent me private messages.
actually due since long, since she begame part of the gossip-providers
and harrassers ... her heart told her I'm the egg, do you remember ??
she 'would gladly apologize if I'm not' - but how blunt must someone be
anyway to assume I would create an ID to make idiotic fun of myself ?
she's so incredibly numb and, now uncovered as fraud also, deeply involved
in the penetrant iyt-bs spun in the background by the known representants ...
regarding those facts and, preemptively preventing further
cheats from her, as she's actually right now busy blurring
the traces of her misuse, by deleting my messages that just
corrected a deliberate misquoting of my posts (guess who)
- here the original part of her msg ventilating about me.
she is a shame for honesty in general and, this server in particular ... ~*~
________________________________________________
Hannelore
Banned
29. May 2003, 17:40:47
danoschek.....gone. I have warned him repeatedly. Sent him personal messages. He is a complete downer and his unprevoked slams on me,(the moderator) and turns good times on this board to slamming.
______________________________________________
there are european simplifications for the original glyphs ...
described in the book 'Xianxi'
( by Budde/Kasperczuk ) for instance
their work is an introduction to the game, but almost
half of the text covers the development from shaturanga
to chess in its branches in 1500 years of history ... ~*~
PS
for those a bit familiar with japanese,
the original pieces are like kanji-signs
while the simplified ones look like hiragana.
indeed this is the 3rd note from me questioning the same.
obviously always the same folks seem not comfortable with
requests to decrease the ease of life for server-parasites. ~*~
<-
I do agree ...
but again that obsessive blurbag has no control altogether ...
- as we know, he lives for 24humbug7. oh well, at least the few
bucks he paid make a tidbit of sense here, unlike his repetitive idiocies ... ~*~
PS
particulary ludicrous his common usage of the term 'fact' which
actually equals a black hole claiming to be the big bang ... ><(((*>
Aware of the new humbug on General Chat
I suggest an approbation time for new accounts
before they may post here. I told you who likely
has no life but to keep up enduring blur ...
Running pattern: Top-Players are attacked, an attempt
of sucking them in, to senseless and infertile debates.
a freeware proggy including variants ...
http://www.netspace.net.au/~trout/
but I have to warn you - won't be easy to implement ...
I could figure, as the pieces change their 'meanings'/power
when crossing certain lines ... the game is a bit static,
compared to the chinese chess but worth a look ... :) ~*~
okay - trying to skin out some core again, to pick up BBW's suggestion,
regardless of how the acceptance of obligatory games for top-players will
develop, private games could offer an option to a challenger, to switch off
ratings for certain games, pleasing people out for the sheer fun ... ~*~ :)
e.g. kids, joining a new kindergarden and too insecure to simply
deliver themselves into the yet unknown social structure, respectively
about their chances of making their way in the game-rankings by just
participating - try to occupy the role called 'Guardian Of Rules'
to build a first outpost in the new world ... ;) ... ~*~
PS
for children, that's a sign of intelligence btw as it's besides
of the role called 'Clown' actually the easiest entry into
SOCIAL ranking, confirmed by psychological studies
as being working ...
any suggestions from serious players how an appropriate timing
for obligatory games of top-players [like me :D] should look like ?
a chess game might take even a few months itself ...
how should the right to challenge be defined ?
for the top ten or, twenty ?
quickshots to fix some glitches of the rankings
messing up the whole system won't help - easier
solution could be that a player who makes only
4 games to feel all cosy on the top of a list is
simply removed from it after being idle for 6 months.
as previously stated, I'm able to look through the surface
even by just utilizing the features that are already available
e.g. view profile - look up game-type - and voila, there's
the spot distinguishing masquerade from seriousness ... ~*~
although I indeed fully support the basic idea, I think a time-range
of two weeks only will let the whole system become a bit obsessive ...
go figure what kasparov would think about
if we project the whole construct at chess
leads to a second objection, the timing simply MUST depend
on the regular game-length of a certain gametype inflicted ...
how should a brainpawn be able to accept all
the challenges regarding his/her limited slots ?
to all my sincer suggestion to reflect all sidelines properly
some people actually have a life and can't stay on 24/7 to accomodate challenges
let's cool down and make a substantial idea of it !
for my person, such a display would influence me as following -
if I'd see somebody who challenges me having about 70%
of his games played as player1 I would simply DEMAND that,
in a first encounter he'd take player2, because I evidently couldn't
rely on the custom of granting a 2nd game with exchanged colours
- happened already.
I won't name the player though - may he remain happy ... :Þ ... ~*~
I second Dmitri's request - maybe not as permanent display, but like
the provisoric ratings, switchable ... merely also as regular addition
like, in football the games at home and, in the opponent's stadium are
separately specified on many leaderboards as well ...
( I mean football, not the american rugby-variation *grin* )
as I'm still unexperienced at Tablut and don't know the stats
for the maharajah chess either - no clue for which game type
it also might turn out handy yet ... ~*~
(nascondi) Alcuni tornei prevedono un premio per il vincitore, come ad esempio un periodo di abbonamento gratuito o un certo numero di "Cervelloni", la "moneta" di Brainking.com. (JackAwesome) (mostra tutti i suggerimenti)