Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
4. Ottobre 2004, 20:28:44
Raymond JL 
Is this why I am losing against you, nothingness ? lol

4. Ottobre 2004, 15:13:50
Nothingness 
Argomento: notes
remember to take notes after every move , it would be better for the notes to be atop the game board forr easy access. i do notes as follows. Captured pieces: 1,1,2,2,4,4,S,etc.... i will also do as follows -3, tis means that i attacked with a 3 and beat teh ? piece! or ill type +2 that means he attacked me with a piece greater than or equal to my 2. the notes are to be used instead of the captured pieces. Its part of the thinking process not to know what has been captured.

1. Ottobre 2004, 20:47:51
david upshaw 
Argomento: Re:
I aggree. Pieces captured should be shown on the sides.

1. Ottobre 2004, 17:53:06
Kevin 
Yes, it seems to do that sometimes...i'm not quite sure why or when... :-)

1. Ottobre 2004, 16:17:31
grenv 
Modificato da grenv (1. Ottobre 2004, 16:20:13)
<I think that the piece attacked should change to show the minimum value
e.g if I attack and lose with a 2 I should see >2 on the piece.

:)

The "less than" character at the beginning was added by the editor ???

29. Settembre 2004, 08:48:03
harley 
We need taken/defeated pieces at the side. I can never remember what value piece I used for an attack. Half the time I can't even remember the last move I made!

29. Settembre 2004, 04:01:48
WizardII 
No, otherwise I could use my 1's and 2's as spies by attacking pieces to see there value. The best you know is that the piece you attacked was higher than you or a bomb.

29. Settembre 2004, 01:16:52
Thad 
Argomento: after an attack...
After I attack an opponent's piece and lose, shouldn't I know the rank of that piece? Shouldn't the "?" be relplaced by the piece's actual value?

29. Settembre 2004, 01:16:06
WizardII 
Regardless you should be able to attack any piece. That is not the same as taking it. After your move you will find out the result of the attacks.

28. Settembre 2004, 20:51:27
DrRobinson 
I think you are right as well. I have not gotten that far in my game, but it is not right according to the rules :oD

28. Settembre 2004, 19:11:19
harley 
No, I think you're right, thats what the rules say. I didn't take the piece, but the computer would have allowed it.

28. Settembre 2004, 19:03:26
hellsfury74304 
Argomento: Re:
could be a bug....the rules page says a spy can only take another spy or sapper......'course i could be wrong :)

28. Settembre 2004, 18:56:07
harley 
I seem to be able to take a number 1 soldier with a spy - thats not right is it?

26. Settembre 2004, 14:09:33
pauloaguia 
never mind... I just got the answer to my question :)
(they can't)

26. Settembre 2004, 14:07:29
pauloaguia 
Argomento: Question
So when it says "In standard Espionage, a player makes a move with two different pieces per turn" does it mean that the same piece can't be moved twice in the same turn?

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio