 |
|
 CheckersDiscuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers. Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
<< < 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 6. Dicembre 2006, 18:11:18 Argomento: Re: hello all B L I T Z M E:I don t no who you are. but i look in my winning list and i see your name there. if you wanna play, play with your rank. note! no Advertising. becose  ciao.12. Dicembre 2006, 23:42:50 Lets all play with each other instead of being big headed 13. Dicembre 2006, 16:11:19 Is it possible to reset your own BKR(s) back to default "unrated" state. 14. Dicembre 2006, 00:03:37 Argomento: Re: hello all  david upshaw, welcome aboard.. Good to have you here. Just quit beating me in the checker games.  18. Dicembre 2006, 05:07:40 Argomento: Re: hello all pattypoo: Thank you pattypoo.  18. Dicembre 2006, 05:17:35 Argomento: Re: Modificato da david upshaw (18. Dicembre 2006, 05:18:27) Grandmaestro: I don't think so. What if all the people you beat went back to "unrated"? It wouldn't be fair to your record. Ratings wouldn't be worth anything if we could simply reset them. Thats just my opinion. If you want an offical answer send the question to Fencer. 18. Dicembre 2006, 06:34:04 Argomento: Re: david upshaw: It's fine. It will just take longer than it would of to be high rated. First 4 games in this rating system are the most important to getting a good head start. 19. Dicembre 2006, 21:29:25 Argomento: Re:  Grandmaestro: Knowing that, you should have paid better attention to the time control of those games...*shrugs* 20. Dicembre 2006, 08:29:25 Argomento: Re: Pedro Martínez: The games were 14 hours per move without days off. I didn't pay attention to the "no days off" and I timed out over the weekend. If I knew it was no days off I wouldn't of timed out! There should be an option to reset one's own BKR anyways. 20. Dicembre 2006, 08:29:54 Especially for payed members. I know I'm not a payed member. 20. Dicembre 2006, 12:15:51 Argomento: Re: Grandmaestro: You can always "forget" your actual membership, and begin another, even with the same name! 20. Dicembre 2006, 14:04:28 Argomento: Re: Grandmaestro: Like I said, you should have paid better attention to the time control. If you had, you wouldn't have timed out. It was only your own fault. Wanting the whole BKR system to be restructured because of your own mistakes is a bit brassy. By the way, there are no payed memberships on BrainKing. None of the available ones have anything to do with ropes either. Gabriel Almeida: No, he can't. At least not if he wants to honor the User Agreement. I actually don't understand why are you inciting him to do so...:( 20. Dicembre 2006, 17:02:23 Argomento: Re: Pedro Martínez: Because cheating doesn't look to be a problem in Brainking... noone cares about it! 21. Dicembre 2006, 02:22:09 Argomento: Reminder  No personal attacks. Please confine your posts to checkers. 21. Dicembre 2006, 08:32:34 Argomento: BKR system Pedro Martinez: nice bedtime story " BKR system to be restructured", even cock and bull story :-)) BKR is very, very bad system. Sample: Nick Klaun played and won 5 games. One opponent has BKR cca 1800 and for between 1100-1400. And Klaun has BKR 2121 :-)))))). Suggestion: new nick, more time win with weak opponent and You will be King in BrainKing :-))))) 21. Dicembre 2006, 21:05:21 Argomento: My 2 cents Why is bkr so important anyway? We are not all on an even playing field. Ever since I learned of the many many people (or should I say accounts) that cheat to boost their ratings,my bkr means nothing to me. I know that if I play a few select friends who I know are not using programs or multiple nics to boost their rating that whether I win,lose or draw,I'm satisfied with a good game played. whatever happened to playing for the fun of it? 21. Dicembre 2006, 21:53:58 Argomento: Re: My 2 cents  Stardust: It's an achievement. A trophy. I play for the fun of it but BKR is important to me. Some games I don't play so well. But where I am good (or decent) then the BKR is a testament to that ;) 22. Dicembre 2006, 02:59:34 Argomento: Re: My 2 cents Gr☺uch☺: Yes,I see what you're saying and I agree to a degree. It's just that some people cheat, lie or steal to be at the top of the chart. They aren't there because they are the best at their particular game. I guess it's finding a balance between playing for fun and playing for 'points'. What has turned me off is the fact that a person's true rating isn't known because of the players who cheat the system. 22. Dicembre 2006, 06:36:22 Argomento: Re: My 2 cents Gr☺uch☺: I agree. Ratings aren't important when compared to family, job security, or personal health, but it is fun to see your ratings jump after a tough win. I can't understand how anyone can enjoy cheating to win, but it happens. I don't think it happens often because cheaters get bored and move on. 22. Dicembre 2006, 09:03:01 There is a gamesite which has 99.9% cheating protection for checkers and other games. 22. Dicembre 2006, 12:07:43 Argomento: Re: My 2 cents david upshaw: I think you would be surprised at how much it does happen because there are people who have made cheating the actual game. 22. Dicembre 2006, 13:42:05 Argomento: Re: Grandmaestro: Kurnik? 22. Dicembre 2006, 22:20:14 Argomento: Re: Gabriel Almeida: Yes 23. Dicembre 2006, 19:40:00 Argomento: Re: BKR system Mysterio619: Only a few players are "silenced" here. Even glob mod's keep on with Mr. Purple "way" (or politics). There are a few couples and friends keeping "Brainking System" (that's like in politic, precisly), and other ones are silenced or ignored. This is all about Checkers! There are some "strategic pieces", and than the others. The first ones command the game... 23. Dicembre 2006, 19:43:17 Argomento: Re: BKR system Mysterio619: We review and try to delete any inappropriate posts. I did not see anyone making fun of anyone so I am not clear what your objection is. Whatever the issue it should be taken up in PM's to myself, co-mods or Globals. Not posted here. 23. Dicembre 2006, 19:50:00 Argomento: Re: BKR system sobek: This system is good for the kind of players we have here, sobek. Interested in a position, even if it means nothing. Anyway, a bad rating system is unfair, but not so much as using programs, or asking friends to play their games. Oh, and Stardust is right: who cares about BKR? In a "place" where people get happy for winning for timeout, it's everything already said! Once again, "BK system" supports that, there's no option to ask to our oponnent to re-instate the game... (Maybe Fencer have been too much time in USA, and really catched their ideas...) 23. Dicembre 2006, 19:57:18 Argomento: Re: BKR system Mysterio619: Purple can speak english, he doesn't need a txtbook, so he hasn't feel offended with Martinez's words... ;) 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:01:32 Argomento: Re: BKR system Mysterio619: here here!! 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:04:06 Argomento: Re: BKR system Stardust: Oh no, my beautiful friend! You see very,very well! Better than a lot of us! ;) 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:06:20 Argomento: Re: BKR system Gabriel Almeida: Thank you but I was agreeing with Mysterio619! And it's easy to see when you've been on the inside lol 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:08:17 Argomento: Re: BKR system Mysterio619: I don't think so! Poor Ustica, he must feel offended for a lot of things people say here! 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:17:42 Argomento: Re: Stardust: Hum... depending of whoe they atack, maybe we should give them a little cake... eheheh. Stardust, it's so easy to understand all this, isn't it? Misteryo is telling the truth, only "the cheatting business" is not allowed here.I also think Pedro Martinez offended Sobek (well, I don't speak very well english too, and if Martinez have told that to me, I would be offended). But what Idon't uderstand it's just... why don't anyone seems to understand those obvious things? My point goes to Fencer and global mod's: are they sleeping? 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:27:07 Argomento: Re: Katchaturian: So do I... 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:38:50 Argomento: Re: Bruno Jesus: You would invite me also,If I was a beautifull woman as Stardust... snif, snif... nobody want's to play with me... eheheh 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:40:50 To Bruno Jesus: You have nice nick and I think, that You know more that you beyond type. Draughts/Checkers is mysterious game with complicated history and mistery. Cheaters never understand this game! Merry Xmas and Happy New Year and I hope, that we meet in really on-line server. Bye all. 23. Dicembre 2006, 20:47:02 Argomento: And the poblem is... I’m sure some players with good ratings don’t cheat. They are: Ferjo, Sobek, Undertaker, Faethon, Wismazstr, Fontal... Only Undertaker is rook. Well, do someone think Fencer would banish brain knight or brain rook? I don’t think so. These are the rules, and those who doesn't like them should go... (I think that's what I'll do... anyway, I've seen this happenning in IYT, Chu thought the same way as Fencer is doing now. Nowadays, IYT is a "desert island". I hope BK history be different...) 23. Dicembre 2006, 21:02:46 Argomento: Violations of Guidelines A few people have now been hidden or banned. There has been plenty of warning. There won't be any more. 23. Dicembre 2006, 21:03:31 Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines Purple: who were? 23. Dicembre 2006, 21:08:57 Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines Gabriel Almeida: You can see what is missing. Now I am asking you to follow the guidelines as well as everyone else. 23. Dicembre 2006, 22:15:34 Argomento: Re: My 2 cents Stardust: I don't really pay that much attention to BKR but I am proud that I am rated what I am in both Chess and Backgammon games. There are games I don't do well in and my BKR reflects that. If I really stink at a game (like go) then I'm not inclined to play it. I'm really just learning checkers strategies. I think I had a won game the other day but blew the ending. Losing is learning. ;) Oh well, that's what I tell my chess students. As for cheating (I'm not trying to keep up this dialogue, just a final perspective maybe) there will always be situations where that happens. There are various ways to handle such things. But as a moderator, I can say that once accusations of any kind hit the public boards, there is no choice but to moderate. Even if there is truth in what is said, public boards are no place for those types of post. ;) I do agree with you about a balance. They are after all, just games. But in finding a balance between playing for fun and playing for 'points, we always keep in mind that we run the race to win. If I lose, I lose. But I never like it. Some say that it's not if you win or lose but how you play. But I say playing to win (and in some cases playing NOT to lose such as in chess and going for a draw when your position is inferrior) is always what I seek. ;) Now I'm rambling :) Merry Christmas!  23. Dicembre 2006, 22:22:28 Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines  As Purple has said, it is not appropriate to discuss moderating issues on this board. If you have concerns, you need to contact by personal message the moderator of the board. If that doesn't offer the answers you are looking for, then you should feel free to contact any Global Moderator. (See the Brainking Staff link at the bottom of every page). This board is for the discussion of Checkers. Accusing specific players of cheating on this board is not allowed. There is no need to reply to this post, unless you are going to do it by personal message. Please, let's all try to enjoy the holiday season without needing to be hidden or banned.  << < 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 > >> |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |