Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Gabriel Almeida , david upshaw 
 Checkers

Discuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers.


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
10. Settembre 2004, 02:17:59
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da Purple (10. Settembre 2004, 02:19:20)
Many were one time friends and as much as I would like to drop a dime like they did I know that it would not be right. But some of them will tell you if you happen to get a game with them..and some will not.

10. Settembre 2004, 02:10:42
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
On IYT, GT and here the Nemesis uses aren't taking any losses and their only draws are against each other.

17. Agosto 2004, 12:59:43
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Cake sans Succi
Cake has always been a major program. It is excellent.

14. Agosto 2004, 03:27:12
Purple 
Argomento: Tournament
We could use one more person to make 4 in the My Fair Lady checker tournament. Please sign up if intereted.

13. Agosto 2004, 23:48:11
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
I believe the advantage is a miniscule percentage point and really only comes into play at the masters/championship level. Some great players swear by white.

11. Agosto 2004, 20:08:51
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
I have never heard of one nor seen one advertised. Pro-checkers (3 move openning) is not a variant and is covered by most checker programs.

8. Agosto 2004, 20:58:20
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Probably don't need queens or parachutes and the kings could have a little dot on them..for just straight checkers. The variants could be added later.

8. Agosto 2004, 18:08:50
Purple 
The Halma graphics make better checker pieces than the chess men we have now.

7. Agosto 2004, 21:15:59
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Would we have to wait for parachutists?

4. Agosto 2004, 02:26:17
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Solving checkers
Very impressive. I wish Chinook woud update it's Wall of Honor which hasn't been done since 02.

27. Luglio 2004, 23:53:42
Purple 
Argomento: Fellowship Tournament
Purple World is having an in-house checker tournament. Come for the tournament and stay for the fellowship. Request an invite if interested.

24. Luglio 2004, 19:06:40
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Mark Pharoah
I played this bright young programmer on IYT and used book..on the 9th move I still had 8 checkers left and none of them could move wothout losing the piece. Everything looked fine but I was sandbagged. He has played in Vegas so he has great natural ability. In our second game he resigned with the board even so he just wanted to try out his program. Still in his teens I think. Awesome player.

24. Luglio 2004, 13:00:23
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Nemesis
Modificato da Purple (24. Luglio 2004, 13:02:51)
I mentioned this because I have seen cases where Nemesis gives false positives. In theory if you are +40 it is a win but I have seen Nemesis give a +40 and then take it away after the opponents next move. And this was after Nemesis recommendation was followed to the letter.

24. Luglio 2004, 05:01:55
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Just one more question. What skills, if any, does the operator require? Does a superior, more experienced operator with a slightly inferior program have any advantage over a better program with a relatively unskilled operator?

24. Luglio 2004, 03:56:19
Purple 
Argomento: WCC
In your opinion Ed can WCC be jammed by the one down gambit? Has any human beaten or drawn the new version?

22. Luglio 2004, 19:27:41
Purple 
Argomento: Re: checkers
You can send me an invite for an unrated game if you like.

12. Luglio 2004, 23:06:38
Purple 
Argomento: Good Checker Site
Modificato da Purple (12. Luglio 2004, 23:11:56)
http://www.acfcheckers.com/index.html/

6. Luglio 2004, 13:26:22
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Many of the top players on the gamesites use programs and the average player has zero chance against them. The chances seem to be slightly increased in Pro Checkers but it is still very very daunting. I knew a grizzled old vetran named Richard Fortman who could pretty much hold his own against programs but he had like about 50 years experience. Nice, great old guy.

6. Luglio 2004, 00:35:05
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Re:
Thanks for the links. It has been a year since I looked at programs but Cake and Nemesis were the top of the line then. WCC had just come out with a platinum but the highest database I remember was an 8..which was awesome enough.

5. Luglio 2004, 23:44:28
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Hello to all!
Maybe somebody reading this will help. I wanted to start with Triplejump.com.

5. Luglio 2004, 23:38:45
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Hello to all!
I don't remember the formula for making links clickable.

29. Giugno 2004, 02:18:29
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Hello to all!
I'm going to try and post some clickable links to checkers websites here.

21. Giugno 2004, 14:43:54
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Not against programs but against any human he would IMHO

20. Giugno 2004, 21:07:34
Purple 
Program vs Program matches are interesting but over the board face to face matches determines the real champ in my opinion. Looking at some of the old Wylie games of the 19th century before anyone could even spell program I saw some marvelous defensive play. I think he would have a good chance today.

20. Giugno 2004, 20:51:48
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
What were the results of those games? I once got a King against an old world champ.

20. Giugno 2004, 20:42:50
Purple 
Was Banks using a program? Was Miller? Were both of them? Or neither?

20. Giugno 2004, 20:05:28
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers)
Absolutely amazing..but it seems to leave little margin for error.

20. Giugno 2004, 18:38:52
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers)
Gothic how do you figure George Miller was able to defeat programs..at least at one time? His play jammed them up from a one down position. Of course that was some time ago.

31. Maggio 2004, 22:12:20
Purple 
Argomento: Congrats Jack
Dama 1 has won the round robin checker tournament on GT. WTG Ustica.

23. Maggio 2004, 20:38:25
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Congrats Nomad
I tried to play him a few times but he wins easily against better.

23. Maggio 2004, 20:31:53
Purple 
Argomento: Congrats Nomad
Just looked at the checker ratings for the first time in a long time and I see the number one player is Nomad. WTG James. Poet, great guy and member of my fellowship and now the top checker dude.

18. Maggio 2004, 13:49:08
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Espie isn't it sufficient that you teach me humility on the checker board? Our latest game on GT was a massacar where my checkers jumped off the board like popcorn in a microwave. At least give me the satisfaction of being able to pick on a peace loving young lady.

18. Maggio 2004, 03:02:00
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
The Purple Smother :)

16. Maggio 2004, 23:36:24
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Puke away but not on the checkers DB.

16. Maggio 2004, 23:25:31
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
One got deleted that was an attack on Fencer as well as myself. Nothing to do with checkers.

15. Maggio 2004, 13:58:57
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Smother Wilther
You are addicted to single corner which you do quite nicely at. Always messes me up. LOL

15. Maggio 2004, 04:52:11
Purple 
outstanding knowledge Nomad. Thanks

15. Maggio 2004, 04:07:10
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
They either forgot to notify me or I forgot to look in the mailbox. Who cares?

14. Maggio 2004, 20:31:10
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Smother Wilther
LOL. Never claimed to read. But no modesty Espie. WAY UP on the IYT Ladder. We have played 150 games. She won 50, me 50, and 50 draws. She is one part mercy, one part apathy and one part sudden death. :)

14. Maggio 2004, 17:59:16
Purple 
Argomento: Smother Wilther
Does anybody know the sequence of moves that leads to this devastating finish? It is part of published play but I can not find the page.

27. Dicembre 2003, 04:22:41
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Rules About Draws
Black is one move away from trading down for the win. I have seen people struggle a long long time figuring out 3/2 kings opposite double corners but eventually they stumble on to it.

23. Dicembre 2003, 22:25:23
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Black has the overwhelming advantage but apparently is unaware how to finish. If 20 moves are made without variation Fencer may declare it a draw.

22. Dicembre 2003, 17:53:16
Purple 
Argomento: Re: KM Future Stars
The tournament is already in progress which is another reason you can not join it. There will be another one shortly,

17. Dicembre 2003, 00:23:58
Purple 
Argomento: Top Gun Checkers
If you have a rating of 1800+ please PM me for an invite to play in this all star checker tournament.

4. Dicembre 2003, 20:58:32
Purple 
Argomento: KM Future Stars
Sign up for a tournament for players rated 2000 and under and the highest placing pawn wins a 6 months upgrade to Brainknight.

29. Novembre 2003, 15:12:21
Purple 
There are some great checkers tournaments for sign up and fans should really check them out. Usurpers promises to be one of the best.

16. Novembre 2003, 01:51:14
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Miller said his hobby was trying to figure out how to cross them up but he did say it was getting harder and harder and he thought he wasn't going to be able to do it much longer.

16. Novembre 2003, 01:35:09
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Mlller wrote to me and said he had a method of packing the programs moves into the left corner and actually playing man down. He said they couldnt deal with that and that's how he gets some wins. He aso runs a smother which most programs don't recognize.

16. Novembre 2003, 01:17:42
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
I notice on Banks Ladder it is program against program and the operators skill comes into play there. But the number one guy seems to have figured out how to jam and cramp most of them. Way over my head.

16. Novembre 2003, 01:10:20
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
I'm not in their living rooms but they lose games and that is the tip off. Free ones? You have my attention. But I don't think the teaching programs are webtv compatible. Even the top KM players make mistakes no program would make so I am taking their word for it. Some have up to 40 years experience which accounts for their expertise.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio