Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Gabriel Almeida , david upshaw 
 Checkers

Discuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers.


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13   > >>
1. Maggio 2007, 01:08:12
just_lady_aging 
Argomento: Re: NEW CHECKERS PLAYER HERE, NUEVA LISTA PARA JUGAR DAMAS
david upshaw: Hola David, i dont know how i could get here again, but i read u and ptti answered me....thanks

1. Maggio 2007, 01:07:12
just_lady_aging 
Argomento: Re:
pattypoo: thank youuuuu,

30. Aprile 2007, 15:08:53
pattypoo 
Argomento: Re:
just-lady: welome, nice to see you ere.. ave fun!!

29. Aprile 2007, 15:54:59
david upshaw 
Argomento: Re: NEW CHECKERS PLAYER HERE, NUEVA LISTA PARA JUGAR DAMAS
just_lady_aging: We are glad to have you here. Good luck.

29. Aprile 2007, 09:08:15
just_lady_aging 
Argomento: NEW CHECKERS PLAYER HERE, NUEVA LISTA PARA JUGAR DAMAS
hola, I am a new member of brainking, purple invited me and i love to play checkers, ready to play. Lista para jugar damas a quien me invite...

29. Aprile 2007, 09:05:11
just_lady_aging 
Argomento: hola purple
Purple: hola, how are u? i am here, hard to read all what this site offers....

23. Aprile 2007, 16:47:52
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Ramones: Contact our Captain David Upshaw for any challenge.

23. Aprile 2007, 16:44:46
Ramones 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da Ramones (23. Aprile 2007, 16:45:51)
Purple: Anyway, I hope your animosity towards me don´t derivate from the fact that I told your FS is not a good team in checkers...

23. Aprile 2007, 16:39:54
Ramones 
Argomento: Re:
Purple: ah, ok. Thanks for the free advice, my dear friend...

23. Aprile 2007, 16:38:34
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Ramones: The words "biased mods" can get you banned. Like on any public board.

23. Aprile 2007, 16:34:54
Ramones 
Argomento: Re:
Modificato da Ramones (23. Aprile 2007, 16:35:18)
Gabriel Almeida: yes, that´s true. They were debating that at the FS... But I can´t post here the reasons. There are some biased mods and I would be banned...

23. Aprile 2007, 16:32:50
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re:
Ramones: Anyway, I think Tugas don't want to play against Tiger Checker's team... I can understand why, besides I'm not in that team anymore...

23. Aprile 2007, 16:19:45
Ramones 
Argomento: Re:
Purple: you are far from being the best team at BK...

if any good team wants a good challenge, contact Tugas FS.

8. Marzo 2007, 16:12:56
david upshaw 
that would be interesting

5. Marzo 2007, 16:59:23
Purple 
Argomento: Re:
Grandmaestro: We have not yet figured a way to play teams from other sites unless they come over here. (Not a bad idea)

5. Marzo 2007, 13:21:30
Grandmaestro 
goldtoken

4. Marzo 2007, 17:17:32
Purple 
Argomento: Tiger Checker Club
We still have a standing offer to play any team in the world. Contact Captain David Upshaw for a challenge.

12. Febbraio 2007, 11:47:00
MadMonkey 
Argomento: Tourny
One for the Checkers players:

MadMonkeys 'Checkers & Chess' Choice (1)

24. Dicembre 2006, 04:22:23
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Maybe helpful to new players
Purple:  thanks ;)

24. Dicembre 2006, 02:35:07
Purple 
Argomento: Maybe helpful to new players
Modificato da Purple (24. Dicembre 2006, 02:36:33)

23. Dicembre 2006, 22:27:37
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: My 2 cents
Purple:  Agreed.  And there's always the global route, as Rod said.  As for checkers, I've decided to try to learn the game a bit.  I know the moves but know nothing about opening theory nor of endgame theory.  And I'm fuzzy on the middle stuff too! ;)  My kids at school (elementary) can beat me.  I think in time I can improve somewhat but I think I'll be rated to begin with near 1400 or maybe a bit less.  We shall see soon enough ;)

23. Dicembre 2006, 22:23:11
Purple 
Argomento: Re: My 2 cents
Gr☺uch☺: Well said. I have seen the "cheating" accusations border on the ridiculous..people who have lost hundreds of games are accused of using a program. Some program! LOL. Anyway all such discussion should be directed to Fencer and this board should be reserved for the stated subjects.

23. Dicembre 2006, 22:22:28
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines
As Purple has said, it is not appropriate to discuss moderating issues on this board. If you have concerns, you need to contact by personal message the moderator of the board. If that doesn't offer the answers you are looking for, then you should feel free to contact any Global Moderator. (See the Brainking Staff link at the bottom of every page).

This board is for the discussion of Checkers. Accusing specific players of cheating on this board is not allowed.

There is no need to reply to this post, unless you are going to do it by personal message.

Please, let's all try to enjoy the holiday season without needing to be hidden or banned.

23. Dicembre 2006, 22:15:34
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: My 2 cents
Stardust:  I don't really pay that much attention to BKR but I am proud that I am rated what I am in both Chess and Backgammon games.  There are games I don't do well in and my BKR reflects that.  If I really stink at a game (like go) then I'm not inclined to play it.

I'm really just learning checkers strategies.  I think I had a won game the other day but blew the ending.  Losing is learning. ;)  Oh well, that's what I tell my chess students.

As for cheating (I'm not trying to keep up this dialogue, just a final perspective maybe) there will always be situations where that happens.  There are various ways to handle such things.  But as a moderator, I can say that once accusations of any kind hit the public boards, there is no choice but to moderate.  Even if there is truth in what is said, public boards are no place for those types of post.  ;) 

I do agree with you about a balance.  They are after all, just games.  But in finding a balance between playing for fun and playing for 'points, we always keep in mind that we run the race to win.  If I lose, I lose.  But I never like it.  Some say that it's not if you win or lose but how you play.  But I say playing to win (and in some cases playing NOT to lose such as in chess and going for a draw when your position is inferrior) is always what I seek. ;) 

Now I'm rambling  :)  Merry Christmas! 

23. Dicembre 2006, 21:08:57
Purple 
Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines
Gabriel Almeida: You can see what is missing. Now I am asking you to follow the guidelines as well as everyone else.

23. Dicembre 2006, 21:03:31
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: Violations of Guidelines
Purple: who were?

23. Dicembre 2006, 21:02:46
Purple 
Argomento: Violations of Guidelines
A few people have now been hidden or banned. There has been plenty of warning. There won't be any more.

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:47:02
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: And the poblem is...

I’m sure some players with good ratings don’t cheat. They are: Ferjo, Sobek, Undertaker, Faethon, Wismazstr, Fontal... Only Undertaker is rook. Well, do someone think Fencer would banish brain knight or brain rook? I don’t think so. These are the rules, and those who doesn't like them should go...


(I think that's what I'll do... anyway, I've seen this happenning in IYT, Chu thought the same way as Fencer is doing now. Nowadays, IYT is a "desert island". I hope BK history be different...)


23. Dicembre 2006, 20:40:50
sobek 
To Bruno Jesus:
You have nice nick and I think, that You know more that you beyond type. Draughts/Checkers is mysterious game with complicated history and mistery. Cheaters never understand this game! Merry Xmas and Happy New Year and I hope, that we meet in really on-line server. Bye all.

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:38:50
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re:
Bruno Jesus: You would invite me also,If I was a beautifull woman as Stardust... snif, snif... nobody want's to play with me... eheheh

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:27:07
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re:
Katchaturian: So do I...

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:17:42
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re:

Stardust: Hum... depending of whoe they atack, maybe we should give them a little cake... eheheh.


Stardust, it's so easy to understand all this, isn't it? Misteryo is telling the truth, only "the cheatting business" is not allowed here.I also think Pedro Martinez offended Sobek (well, I don't speak very well english too, and if Martinez have told that to me, I would be offended). But what Idon't uderstand it's just... why don't anyone seems to understand those obvious things? My point goes to Fencer and global mod's: are they sleeping?


23. Dicembre 2006, 20:08:17
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Mysterio619: I don't think so! Poor Ustica, he must feel offended for a lot of things people say here!

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:06:20
Stardust 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Gabriel Almeida: Thank you but I was agreeing with Mysterio619! And it's easy to see when you've been on the inside lol

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:04:06
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Stardust: Oh no, my beautiful friend! You see very,very well! Better than a lot of us! ;)

23. Dicembre 2006, 20:01:32
Stardust 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Mysterio619: here here!!

23. Dicembre 2006, 19:57:18
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Mysterio619: Purple can speak english, he doesn't need a txtbook, so he hasn't feel offended with Martinez's words... ;)

23. Dicembre 2006, 19:50:00
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: BKR system

sobek: This system is good for the kind of players we have here, sobek. Interested in a position, even if it means nothing.


Anyway, a bad rating system is unfair, but not so much as using programs, or asking friends to play their games.


Oh, and Stardust is right: who cares about BKR? In a "place" where people get happy for winning for timeout, it's everything already said! Once again, "BK system" supports that, there's no option to ask to our oponnent to re-instate the game...


(Maybe Fencer have been too much time in USA, and really catched their ideas...)


23. Dicembre 2006, 19:43:17
Purple 
Argomento: Re: BKR system
Mysterio619: We review and try to delete any inappropriate posts. I did not see anyone making fun of anyone so I am not clear what your objection is. Whatever the issue it should be taken up in PM's to myself, co-mods or Globals. Not posted here.

23. Dicembre 2006, 19:40:00
Gabriel Almeida 
Argomento: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: Only a few players are "silenced" here. Even glob mod's keep on with Mr. Purple "way" (or politics). There are a few couples and friends keeping "Brainking System" (that's like in politic, precisly), and other ones are silenced or ignored.


This is all about Checkers! There are some "strategic pieces", and than the others. The first ones command the game...


22. Dicembre 2006, 22:20:14
Grandmaestro 
Argomento: Re:
Gabriel Almeida: Yes

<< <   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio