I have no friend and enemy here
what I want is to play the possible strong player.

kleineme: After I reviewed your game against an opponent who is rated about 378 pts below you..
If I were you I don't bother to cry out for Arbriter......I will look into the game if I have another way to beat this guy { a weak opponent}

I suggest you play against stronger player who understand the game rule and good for you to improve yourself......

computeropponen:
435152 is pretty strong. Much stronger in chinese chess than me, that's sure. If you want to play the current two top rated players of active established rating for chinese chess, I will play you. If you want the two best players here, it's not me.

what?

svyel: Was that game played in Germany?

I am here to accept any one for a chinese chess game
this is a better way for me to challenge people

Here is a game for your comment
1 Ce3 Hc8 2. Hg3 Cf8
3. Ri2 Hg8 4. Rf2 Rh10
5. Hc3 dAe9 6. Cb5 c6
7. Cg5 Rh8 8. Rb1 g6
9. Cxg8 Rxg8 10. Rb7 g5
11. e5 xg4 12. He4 Rg6
13. e6 xe6 14. Rf6 Rxf6
15. Hxf6 f4 16.Hh7 Ch8
17. Hg5 Ra8 18.fAe2 Hd6
19. Hf7 Ch1+ 20. Ei3 He8
21. Rd7 Cd8 22. Rc7 Cc8
23. Rd7 Cd8 24. Rc7 Cc8
25. Rd7 Cd8 26. Rc7 Cc8
27. Rd7 Cd8 28. Rc7 Cc8
29. Rd7 Cd8 30. Rc7 Cc8
31. Rd7

GUESS WHAT IS THE WEBMASTER'S DECISION ?

A rule is a rule just declaired the game is lost for the guy who is the violator. WHEN THAT CHASE REPEATED 3 TIMES.

I would like to challenge 435152 for a game
and the top two players for a game too.

when I read all the comments on this discussion board...I find 435152 is a guy who knows very well abt c chess...heor she could be a very good player...

Pedro Martínez, FromHell, svyel: Thanks for your support. You didn't convince my opponent, but you've convinced Fencer who put an end to this unpleasant chapter.

This is a clear violation of rules by red!!
Perpetual chase of the black car is definitely forbidden, red has to change, otherwise the game is lost!!(see rules of Asian Xiangqi Federation)

svyel
Arbiter in German Xiangqi Federation

Pedro Martínez, kleineme:
I have to agree to both of you. The asian rules are just saying the same like the BK rules, just more detailed for special situations. So in my opinion your opponent has to stop chasing your rook in this perpetual way.

kleineme: You don't need to refer to the Asian Rules. The BK rules clearly provide that:
“Perpetual chasing of an unprotected enemy piece is forbidden too. It means that a player cannot attack the same enemy piece (which is not protected by another enemy piece) moving to and from the same two points indefinitely. The player who causes such situation is obliged to break it off.”

I need some help from the XQ rule experts among you. Please take a look at one of my games. According to my interpretation of Chapter 21 within the Asian rules I am of the opinion that my opponent has to stop chasing my rook and play another move either instead of Ng3 or instead of Ni2. My opponent doesn't agree so I need someone who explains to him why he has to change moves, or someone who explains to me why I have to change moves. Thanks in advance!

You can go to www.wxf.org for annotated games, master database, and endgame theory Its the world chinese chess federation

435152: If you do not want to play games where your opponet has 10 days to make a move then I suggest you do not make or accept them.

You have some interesting comments to make but continual whinging is not one of them. Further whinges about playing times and the the like will be edited or deleted.

Thank you

WQ :)

435152: my opponent's last move is 4......Nc8 this move was made on 1 April 2009, 18:41:12...his previous move on 23 March 2009, 16:57:10...It take 10 days to make one move....i hate it, i hate this slow moving game.....he did it on purpose. he just want to win the game by that.....he knows he is no match for me.....

any way, his last move is not bad..... can he match me for the whole game? i could make my move right away, i don't need 10 days for one move, but i won't stay at this site any longer.....

for whom? ho ho ho ho
pretended you are happy just put on dark eye glasses with smiing.. show your teeth with open mouth...
oh yes, i am the great pretender...pretending i am playing well...

how do you know you can beat your opponent? if you have not played a game with him before. ...just look into his games move by move, you ask yourself a question, is his move you expected? can you find another move better than his move? how much better your move compared with his move? if just one move ahead of his, you may not win but you will not lose, if you can see two moves ahead of him, you can beat him for sure.

435152: Of course you can. If you look at the game notation, there are arrows << <> >> . You can go to the very first move and use the > to go forward move by move.

what kind of game? what kind of player like my opponent? what kind of sport like this? i don't think this is sport. The last move he made is on 23 March 2009, to day is 28 March 2009. He did login and logout many times during this period, now he is using the automatic vacation.............

when i look at finished chinese chess game, what i see is just the final position, i can not retrieve the whole game from the beginning move by move.
the same as when i look at some one's in progress game, i can not replay the game from the beginning...

435152: ALL THE COMMENTS ON MY GAME STILL IN PROGRESS ARE VERY WELCOME

This is a CHINESE CHESS discussion board, isn't it?

i have seen comments on the world class chess game still in progress, the players have no objection at all. the public welcome and enjoy it. the players just worry about how the opponent will cheat with computer help...such as the toiletgate and a GM withdrawn from the tournament after filing a complaint against his opponent using outsite help to defeat him in short moves. ha ha i don't think anything you should worry about if the commemts are on the already made move ....also playing online the chance to cheat with computer or outsite help is unavoiable....why don't you worry about that?

this is my comment to my own game, i play Red:
1 CE3 NG8 2 NG3 RH10 3 NC3.....The first two moves of my opponent were made in the same day, it is flexible, he has the options to play many opennings.......so far so good...not thing wrong with Black....

My last move NC3 has some meaning, i did not want to play by book, the intention is very obvious, my next move will be PC5 or PE5. my opponent stopped here, i think he was looking for references .......

After 3 days (i can't remember exactly how many days later) he made this move 3.....PC6. (this move were made 23 March 2009, 16:57:10) ....4 RI2 ..... My move were made 23 March 2009, 17:06:34....
my message to him:
435152: your move I expected...why you take so long to make this move?
and i see this pop up in Red : Your opponent is using the automatic vacation.

After 4 RI2 ... if 4.........CC8 5 PE5 PC5 i let his pawn cross the river...i would like to see what he can do..............

435152: Your comments about games, which are still in progress, are not welcome. Please stop doing this and wait until the game is finished. Or choose a game which is already finished.

kleineme: your opponent's move Cannon to G8 is not a good move, because he did not see the position well, actually he is in a winning position even you won two pawns, and his army is very active, his rook at i9 is much better than your rook at A1..If he move his Knight to D5 instead of Cannon to G8.......i am looking at more of your game and post my comments here.

you guys are so good chinese chess players, i can't wait to play with all of you . you beat me as you can. i don't mind to learn the way you play. just show me what you are , how strong you are.

on the board, only win or lose counted, no friend or enemy

sorry i don't have time to teach now even some one said "yes" to me.

forweg: playing online always there are suspect to use computer to cheat. do you know the different between human and computer move?

kleineme: i suggest to have two games between you and me , then i will stay here until i beat you and quit

fakar10: after 2 years+- my reply is that: no good chinese chess player will come here to play...i quit this site the 2nd time now

Hello everybody!
I like chinese and korean chess too. Is it possible to organize some games at korean chess? Or propose korean chess on this portal?
Regards
Antonio

etnep:
never mind
A guard moves one space diagonally
mod you could remove this post if you want

here is the board
Chinese Chess (gdwilt vs. etnep)
why cant i move F10 to F9? to block the check? is this a program error?
and if you cant see the game from the link it should be on my profile right?

Etnep VS gdwilt

Less than one week to go until the start of my Xiangqi prize tournament!

Two Years of Xiangqi on Brainking

Celebrating the introduction of Xiangqi on Brainking on 2005/08/12

Play for the inofficial Xiangqi-Championship and try to win one of these prizes:

1st place: 1 year Rook membership
2nd place: ½ year Rook membership
3rd place: 150 Brains

The tournament will start two years after the start of the first inofficial Championship.

Two Years of Xiangqi on Brainking

Celebrating the introduction of Xiangqi on Brainking on 2005/08/12

Play for the inofficial Xiangqi-Championship and try to win one of these prizes:

1st place: 1 year Rook membership
2nd place: ½ year Rook membership
3rd place: 150 Brains

The tournament will start two years after the start of the first inofficial Championship.

Just finished this game. It has a nice chariot sacrifice to finish:
Chinese Chess (Waterfall vs. Beren the 32nd)
But were my tactics good throughout?

435152: Why don't you bring some other good players to this site? I'm sure sure they will come when they hear that a marvelous player like yourself play here.

435152: You complained and complained and complained about the quality of players on this site. How they were all jokes and so far below your level. But, now I see that someone is playing you well, and you accuse him of using a computer program! Unbelievable.

Dear friends of Xiangqi from Switzerland. Are you tired of playing online?
On Sunday, november 26th, the 4th Swiss Xiangqi Chiampionship will take place at the Kwang Chow restaurant in Zurich-Milchbuck. Everyone is kindly invited to participate. More information (German and English) on http://www.sxv.ch/sm06.
I'd like to see you there.

435152: While analyzing other peoples' games may not technically be wrong, the way you were doing it did not appear very polite. You should probably reconsider doing that.

And there is really no need to be sharing your views on fellow Brainking users appearances on this board. I have edited out those comments.

435152: "at first, i think the chinese chess discussion board needed a player like me to do more xiangqi game analysis."
"it is why i am better than all of your guys here."



but this is my last post. no more.

naughtypawn:
the previous post re: game analysis on 26 October 2006, 15:40:32 supposed to be my last post, but, after i read your post i decided to add one more as my last post here.

> "I got sick of reading so much criticism from you about games other players play. Why not analyze your own games? Come on, tell us how good or bad you are. Or do yoiu pay perfectly?"

i just pointed out the mistakes the other players play, it is not thing wrong with that, if you think that is a criticism it is up to you. in my view, if some one could do the same thing to me i will be very happy to accept that. that way, i know what is wrong with my play, i can learn from my mistake.
i remembered long time ago, every time my teacher pointed out my mistakes , i always said " thanks sir" this is my way to learmn to play my chinese chess, also, it is why i am better than all of your guys here.
i did analyze my own game, if you read the post on 19 October 2006, 435152 vs FromHell, after that post i wanted to see if some one will comment on "my self annotation" of that game, so i still login sometimes, hoping that some one will give me a good idea how to play that game better, or if i missed something that i did not see.

did i play perfectly? how good i am? to tell the true, i am better than most of your guys here. no body is perefect,there are always some one is better than you, but if your opponent see one move ahead of you, you always are a loser, you can not win.


at first, i think the chinese chess discussion board needed a player like me to do more xiangqi game analysis. i do not know that will make some one sick.
but this is my last post. no more.

435152: I got sick of reading so much criticism from you about games other players play. Why not analyze your own games? Come on, tell us how good or bad you are. Or do you play perfectly?

"Quote removed"
This is a flaming comment as emmett said. Don´t mess players about their play just because they don´t do as a professional.
I hope that post will be your last one, really.

Edited only to remove the quote referenced, since I removed it from the original posts

435152: That is a flaming comment (regarding Crying Loser, at the bottom of the last post. 435152 should be restricted when talking about other players.

after i post my "last post" here, sometimes i still login to see if some one will comment on the game "435152 vs FromHell". i could not resist the temptation.

here, i found another game of CryingLoser, the no.1 chinese chess player of this site, i would like to comment on it.
there are many private games, i don't know why they are still a private game, they are "finished games" now.


CryingLOSER (red) vs Kleineme(black) 5 nov 2005
tournament: Glenfiddich(Oriental games vs Lorien)

1.Che3 Nc8
2. Ri2 Cf8
3. Rd2 Ng8
4. Pg5 Rh10
5. Ng3 Rh6
6. Cbc3 Pg6

black should have played Rb10 to control the b-file, if Na3 Ca8..

7. Pxg6 Rxg6
8. Na3 Rb10
9. Rb1 Cb4
10. Pc5 Ege8

should be the other elephant up

11. Rd4 Cb2
12. Rd2 Cb4
13. Rd4 Cb6

red was perpetually chasing black's cannon which is unprotected, if black wanted to keep the same moves, red must stop doing that.

14. Rd9 Gfe9
15. Nc4 Cf9
16. Rd2 Pe6
17. Rb5 Rg4
18. Rd6 Pc6
19. Rd7 Cf4
20. Na5 Pxc5
21. Rxc5 Nce7
22. Nb7 Rb8
23. Cxe6 Rxg3
24. Cxc10+ Exc10
25. Rxc10 Kf10??

black should have played Cf10 instead of Kf10, then everything is alright for black. if 26. Nd8+ Rxd8 27. Rxd8 Rg6 28. Ce5 Re6...

red won this game not because he played well, just because black did not know how to defend.
the game looked like a beautiful game red sacrificed two pieces but he did not calculate accurately.
the sacroifice is not the correct one.

so the loser became a winner