Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
grenv: Oh yes, ditto. Those would b nice. I have some friends who send more then one game invite at a time. Or some days I log on to find 10 game invites. It would be great to accept all at once!
Would it be possible to have some way to rearrange things we have saved in our notepad. So we could group some together or put others on the top or bottom.
I tried to transfer ownership of the FS Our Place to Slam with the result that I am no longer Big Boss but neither is he. There is a similar problem with Ask Dr. Purple where he is listed as Big Boss but has no functions. These are private fellowships. Can you advise?
BIG BAD WOLF: Could you explain this limit? I'm not member of any fellowships, but I'd like am explanation of this limit and when it came about. Does it effect how many one can join? Or be the Big Boss of? What happens to people that are already over the limit? Is the limit temporary or permanent? Why was it instituted? When will it be rescinded? Even though I'm not a member of a fellowship, it seems like a lessening of the service if I'm now restricted when I never even used it. Do I get some other thing as compensation?
There is a new limit of 2 fellowship to be BIG BOSS (create/run). It's only for new fellowships. If a person already runs more then 2, that is allowed (grandfathered in), but will no longer be able to have more then 2.
There is still no limit for the number you can join.
BIG BAD WOLF: We joined three days apart almost two years ago. Why should you get a better deal than me? Where's my grandfather clause? Doesn't seem right or fair to me. And you didn't answer my question as to why this is being done. It does sound like it's being done permanently though.
First: Actually no one said anything about a grandfather clause but me - as a way to exaplin how it is a NEW rule that is now in place.
Second: If Fencer says that he wants everyone back below 2 fellowships, I will then get rid of 1 - no problems from me.
Third: Why was it done? (my guess) is that some people had started creating many fellowships, which could have been easily combined into 1 or 2. I believe it was done to stop the possible abuse that can happen. (There was one incedent where a person create 3-4 fellowship all for the same purpose, but was asked to get rid of some and they did - which is probable a reason.)
Walter - If you have more then 2 fellowships, you also are allowed to keep them for now - unless told otherwise - I have been given no extra deal or anything.
pgt: I don't intend to join or form any either, but it still seems like something is being taken from me. Maybe it's just a preception problem on my part. I'm getting penalized for the actions of others. Why not reward us people that don't cause problems instead of lowering the service because of the idiots that make trouble?
Have a look at Pond page.
About fellowships - yes, it's exactly like BBW describes. There is probably some small bug with Big Boss transfer under these circumstances.
I had a couple of fellowships I wanted to start recently, and didnt because I knew Fencer was going to limit them son, and didnt want to waste the time just to get it taken away. I know other people gave away fellowships before the change because they wanted to start a new one but didnt want to go over the limit of 2.
I think that anyone with a rook membership created before the rule change should continue with the same benefits that we signed up with. We should all be grand fathered, and impliment the rule for new and renewed memberships from this point on.
Either that or only allow 2 for everybody regardless.
When you pay, you sign up for all the available options, and they shouldnt be taken away during that membership period.