Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
You cannot join the fellowship because this feature is available for Brain Knight or higher membership level. You can solve this unpleasant situation by upgrading your membership.
Mr. Shumway: isnt it possible to cancel a game if you havent made too many moves. If so, isnt it possible someone would keep cancelling until they got to play the color they wanted?
件名: Re: Move limitations and automatic for removing of tournaments
grenv: exactly right grenv, the point mctrivia makes on this is irrelevant to the speed rating.
A different rating may be an average of time it takes for a player to actually make a move when it is their turn. This would be more accurate than my first suggestion. If mctrivia modified his post a little, maybe he meant that in a 7 day game your opponent can take all 7 days, you can then move immediately but it is still only one move in 7 days making you look bad.
Something more along the lines of the time taken feature at goldtoken but get an average per move, this way your slow opponents wouldnt affect your speed rating.
So mctrivia, indirectly, thank you very much for pointing out a flaw in my original idea :)
件名: Re: Move limitations and automatic for removing of tournaments
grenv: why not have a simple rating for every player. Moves / Game then it doesnt matter quite so much how many games they have started. If they have 100 active games and make 200 moves that day, they score a rating of 2. (2 moves per game per day) If they have 600 games and make 50 moves, they have a rating of 0.083.
Then set a tournament that only accepts players with ratings over whatever the creator sets.
This would not totally guarantee a specialist from screwing up the tournament but it would help a lot and certainly help identify slow players
件名: Re: Move limitations and automatic for removing of tournaments
CryingLoser: I was under the impression this whole idea started because many people were getting frustrated with specialists holding up games. The target seems to have moved away from that directive
BIG BAD WOLF: thanks. I find the pictures can make it hard to follow a thread by taking up room. So many times now I look on a board, General Chat for example, and I try and read the newst 20 messages and it looks like a lot but it ends up being filled with single messages such as "lol" only etc and as it turns out, all 20 messages are often pointless.
rod03801: why would you laugh at that suggestion? It was a real question and not intended to be a setup for mockery. You are also a moderator so maybe you should moderate your own comment
CRY ME A RIVER: better yet, maybe there should be a limit. Tournaments with less than 10 or 20 players dont count for tourney wins. Lets face it, having a tourney win in a 4 person tournament is kind of silly. Maybe some egomaniacs like it but it is pointless and the wins mean nothing
wellywales: do you mean like the one in gmail? I thought that was so cool a web based email having a spell checker. I would imagine it is difficult to implement though if yahoo and hotmail dont have it