Sign up for the new Pente tourny for players with BKR above 1700. It is fast start and I`m hoping to start games May 25th.
Hoping to see many of the BK top players in the tourny!
There will be a live round robin Pente tournament in Baltimore around the middle of May (the exact date is not yet set). So far we only have 7 people: dmitriking, up2ng, cicerolove, dweebo, mmammel, mike321, and kevin. We need some more people -- I am sure there are a LOT more people around on the East Coast. But the tourn is not limited to people from the East Coast -- Greg is coming all the way from Texas!
A live tournament is a fantastic opportunity to meet some of the top players and personalities face to face. So make a commitment to support the live Pente community and join us for fun over real boards.
Go to WPPF site (tourney section) to sign up (now):
http://www.playpente.com
Announcing the 2004 Pente Email Open World Championship. Top Pente and Renju players from around the world take part in a very competitive tournament. It will be using the opening variant D-Pente in which the first four moves are placed by one player, then the other player has the option of which color to play. This opening removes the advantage of moving first which exists even with the regular Pente tournament rule.
The tournament will be held on Richard's Play by EMail server, send me a message if you would like to play or if you have questions about how to use PBEM.
-Mark
Just to let you guys know that the Southwest Regional Championships as well as the World Pente Championship are gearing up. If you want more information about them, go to PlayPente. If 30 people come to the WC then we will have a total purse of $1500!
8 peoepl have already registered for the WC and 5 for the Southwest Regional
Hey everyone, you may have heard about the 5th Pente tournament at Dweebo's stone games at www.pente.org, but there is a new twist. To liven things up a bit, I am putting up a 50 dollar cash prize for the winner of this tournament.
In Japan the points (other then center) are show the place for handicup stones.
In ancient Japan during playing Ninuki (Pente) more stronger player gave handicup.
If you win three games in a Row , then you have play with this player only as second.
If then you also win three games in a row , he get possibility to put one more additional stone at the board but only in points specially marked at the board.
And so on till 4-5 stones handicup.
Each stone of handicup means the rank difference.
Alexander
thad- i have never played at pente.net so i must take your word.
the board has markers 3 away like at .net, and dsg, they are there for opening move restriction, there is also a marker at 6 out, most likly from the origianl go boards...
very funny taurec, but so far you have not proved your wise at all : )
Actually, IYT has markers six lines out on their 19 x 19 boards and only five lines from center on their 13 x 13 boards. Neither of these correspond to P1's move #2 restriction. Pente.net's markers are six and three lines from center on their boards and you can play with or without the restriction on either size board. BrainKing has no markers at all. I believe the way pente.net has their markers on the 19 x 19 board is the way they were originally done by inventor of Pente and by the various game board manufacturers through the years, but I'm not certain of that. Only DSG has the markers 3 lines out.
So now we've tripped over something interesting. Why are the markers traditionally placed where they are (and where exactly do they belong)? Anyone?
G7, is the center if that helps you : )
as for the other markers, why should they be there? the markers are used for opening restriction games.... <lets first player know were they can play there second move>
Sam, I do not have a bigger problem. I like to play without the opening move restriction (not necessarily against everyone or all the time). Playing this way has been discussed to death here and at other places and I am not going to get into that again. There is no reason I can't play this way. The only version of Pente here without the opening restriction is played on a board without a center marker (and K10 is not the center square either). It would be better if there were one, (along with the other markers on all the boards). Do you disagree with that?
you play that 13x13 bs (small pente), and games were there is no opening move restriction in effect (open pente).
when will people learn 13x13 pente was IYTs invention, AND iyt WAS WRONG!
Well, see now, I did it again, it's not Small Pente, but Open Pente, which needs a center marker. And the reason that I posted here is that there is no Open Pente DB. ;-)
Ok, you are right, but it would still be nice to have the outer markers as well. The center spot is highlited in Pente at the start of the game. My real problem is in Small Pente, where it is not. I get confused by the different game variation names on different sites. I will make a post on that DB. ;-)
I find it interesting players are caring more about the game board, draw buttons and other things that dont matter... <hell why is the board green????>
Everyone should be trying to think of a way to make the game more fair for black!
thad-
K10 is the center... make a sticky if you cant remmber
dont click or except draws...
Traditionally, there is a dot at the center of the pente board. A dot is also placed at a few other places on the board. Any way we could get those here? I like to place my first stone in the center and that would be much easier with a mark. ;-)
Ok, I was mainly interested in other people's opinions. That's why I made my previous post. My main concern is that the button could be abused in a tournament to allow players to artificially manipulate the standings and advnace when one of them shouldn't. I've seen this happen at IYT. But since we have the S-B tiebreak points, I'm assuming that couldn't happen here and that, even if it did, that Fencer or the tournament creator would fix the situation. :-)
there is little need for it in pente. the only time a draw should occur is when both players keep winning 1 game of a two game set, as can happen with two evenly matched players.
That said, taurec also makesa good point that it need not be used by those who do not like it. I would like to see it eliminated, but I won't care too much if it stays.
This problem was already discussed several months ago. Although draw is really impossible in some games, the button will stay for all games because there can be more reasons to agree with a draw [for example, one player knows that he would lose due to a timeout and his opponents agrees with a draw to solve this situation by making both players happy].
2) who is taurec? do you play under a different name at a different site? You are unrated at this site, I notice. Also, I don't understand what you mean by, "oppress your inessential restrictions to free players." That sentence doesn't really make sense to me.
Does anyone out there share my feelings that there should not be an 'Offer Draw' button on any Pente game pages, since a draw is (virtually) impossible in Pente?
Fencer, would it be difficult to implement?
Of course a *tie* in a two-game match is quite possible (and often likely), but that's a different story. ;-)
I mean Top players competitions like World Championship or Finals of the Tournaments, other competitions it is possible to use it or not , it is not important, because strong players can win against middle class players as second number, too. To use or not to use openning is choice of player, so it depends on his tacktick and we can not decide is it fair or not. There a lot of stupid opennings moves which just lose , why we will discuss is it fair or not to play it against your opponent ?
Regards Alexander
Ok. So you want to use this point system for use in scoring during tournaments. Not for anything else, correct? That might work. Perhaps a 'Offer 2-point loss' button (like an 'Offer Draw' button in chess) could be added to this site. That would help too.
But don't certain lines tend to lead to wins without the chance of P2 getting his 1 point, while others do not? For example, the wedge often ends 5-4 on pairs (at least when I play ;-) ), while the Boston opening usually does not, so even an expert P2 might not be able to get 1 point depending on which opening his opponent chooses. Is that fair? I'm not sure.