ユーザー名: パスワード:
新ユーザー登録
 Checkers

Discuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers.


1ページあたりのメッセージ件数:
掲示板表
この掲示板でメッセージを作成にはポーン会員以上の会員レベルが必要となりますので、あなたは作成権限が有りません。
モード: 誰でも投稿可能
メールの内容の検索:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
13. 2月 2015, 20:40:17
david upshaw 
件名: Re: New Moderator
rod03801: Yes. That would be great!

13. 2月 2015, 01:44:14
rod03801 
件名: Re: New Moderator
david upshaw: I can take care of it, if you would like.

12. 2月 2015, 21:04:53
david upshaw 
件名: Re: New Moderator
Gabriel Almeida: I don't know how to change the Moderator, but I'll try to figure it out. I am good with you taking over if there aren't any objections.

7. 2月 2015, 00:35:05
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re: New Moderator
david upshaw: I would like, David!

6. 2月 2015, 16:34:19
david upshaw 
件名: New Moderator
I had told Bill sometime back that I didn't have to time to serve a significant role on this board. Does anyone have an interest in being the Moderator?

6. 2月 2015, 16:32:05
david upshaw 
Very saddened by Bill's (Purple) passing. I've never met him in person, but I've played checkers him online for about 17 years. We first played on a site ItsYourMove and then we both came here. He will be missed.

26. 1月 2015, 03:11:19
rod03801 
件名: Re: Bill past away. ( Purple )
ustica tnp: oh my goodness

26. 1月 2015, 01:42:45
ustica tnp 
件名: Bill past away. ( Purple )
I have terrible news about are friends Bill.
he past away.
my condolence to is wife and family.

He will be missed greatly...

16. 7月 2011, 00:06:25
biggooner 
He is a great man

15. 7月 2011, 02:57:26
Stardust 
件名: Re:
biggooner: wow...I guess checker playing is an O'Brien trait :-)

14. 7月 2011, 20:20:41
biggooner 
I may be behind the times as only just found it but this documentary is truly brilliant http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title/the_checker_king/

12. 7月 2011, 21:01:16
ustica tnp 
件名: Re:
Purple: bill look this game."http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGameg=1973430&i=57" he play all way. only a sore loser play the way. i thin was pray if i time out...

12. 7月 2011, 14:10:47
Purple 
件名: Re:
Stardust: Some of the best players can't do well at Giveaway checkers and some very poor players excel at Giveaway. I can't really understand why it is.

12. 7月 2011, 13:33:23
Stardust 
件名: Re:
biggooner: It's apples and oranges...they play a different game and try to pass it off as checkers

12. 7月 2011, 11:04:08
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re:
ustica tnp: Of course not! That is the point! :)

12. 7月 2011, 08:36:53
biggooner 
件名: Re:
ustica tnp: Thats why seen you alll at tournaments.... oh silly me, maybe not

12. 7月 2011, 04:37:54
ustica tnp 
件名: Re:
Purple: bill no one beat km club in any site. :)

10. 7月 2011, 01:43:14
rod03801 
rod03801 (10. 7月 2011, 01:45:57)に変更されました。
This board WILL NOT sink into personal fights. This is the ONLY warning. Thank you. As the Moderator said, the personal stuff will be dropped, and the topic will be Checkers. Not accusations back and forth. And, this will not be debated here either.

10. 7月 2011, 01:30:00
biggooner 
I am gooner but not on in a while so account closed, nice try lol

9. 7月 2011, 12:45:19
Purple 
件名: Re:
Stardust: Of course.

9. 7月 2011, 03:28:06
Stardust 
件名: Re:
Purple: There is a place called the real world where people actually sit across a board from their opponent and play a game or two of checkers. Not all games are played on computers, or with computers, for that matter.

8. 7月 2011, 23:13:00
Undertaker. 
件名: Re:
Purple: Probably, you're pinchitos...he's. My mistake.

8. 7月 2011, 12:53:12
Purple 
件名: Re:
biggooner<Why does your profile show you have never played any games with anyone? Are you using another nic? Let us drop the subject.

8. 7月 2011, 11:55:40
biggooner 
件名: Re:
Gabriel Almeida: just saying how his game changes with the weather. So have no idea why he is preaching. Maybe he should practise what he preaches

8. 7月 2011, 11:28:47
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re:
biggooner: That was the point of my message too! Cheating? Programs? For some players, "playing the game" is still the most important thing. That's nice. The others are trash, for me!

8. 7月 2011, 11:20:51
biggooner 
your getting boring purple, I have played you several times, and at times you make comp moves and other times your moves are inconsistent. To some people ratings are more important than the game

7. 7月 2011, 21:43:13
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Clean players

Wanna see how plays a "clean player"? See this game! It was won for me, after a hard fight. Skinny congratulated me for that. But, while talking to a friend, I made a stupid mistake, and lost it. Skinny noticed it, asked me what happened, and when I told him, he offered me the draw! That's what a great player do!


I resigned the game, because it was my mistake, but preciate skinny's attitud. That's because of players like skinny that BK it's still a good site.


6. 7月 2011, 17:42:08
Purple 
件名: Re:
Darles Chickens: Programs play very predicatable lines but not.easy to spot. Many legitimate players use the same few moves so it takes lots of games to spot a user. A few years ago a player unashamedly sold his Checker programs right here on this site. The late, great Richard Fortman beat programs very often..so have some others.

6. 7月 2011, 17:08:03
Darles Chickens 
And if all have the knowledge about available programs, I think it would be easier to catch the cheaters and prevent the use...

6. 7月 2011, 17:01:25
Darles Chickens 
件名: Re:
Purple: ok, let's put a stone on km's grave, never forgetting the evilness of a few (5, huh?)... Now, back to the first goal, and I hope you do have a word to say... It is regretable to use programs in our games!  It's not honest and this should be inculcated in everyone's conciousness. We can't prove with certainty that someone used a program against us, but we can decline a game against someone if we suspect he's using a program. The only way I have to check if someone's using a program is to analyse all moves and make a comparison. and even so it's very hard, because we have to run several programs. So, back to beginning, unless someone has a better idea, its all a question of conciousness...

6. 7月 2011, 16:15:40
Purple 
件名: Re:
Darles Chickens: Out of 68 KM members there were 5 using programs. There were many more innocent than the few guilty. There were bans for multiple nics and ratings boosting..not for program use.

6. 7月 2011, 16:04:14
Darles Chickens 
件名: Re:
Purple: I wonder...Why did you posted that km comment, if I only wrote that I would like everyone to know what programs are beeing used in checkers and anti-checkers games, to prevent cheating? I know you're a good person and your subconscious send you a message to discard yourself from that regretable group...But, as Shakespeare wrote in Julius Caesar's play and you very well quoted: "The evil that men do lives after them..the good is often interred with their bones", I guess km evil is very alive, because some players are still using such programs...

6. 7月 2011, 10:01:25
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re:

Darles Chickens: I'm still blocked by Purple because I asked about KM group and "the possibility" of cheating... eheheheh. I see some bones up in the air, never interred! ;)


Yeah, programs are such an idiot way to win games. I can't understand why some people do it! I have my own theory, but I'll tell it to you in some other place, where my words can't be deleted, Mr. Darles. ;)


5. 7月 2011, 13:07:04
Purple 
件名: Re:
Darles Chickens: The evil that men do lives after them..the good is often interred with their bones. So let it be with the KM. :)

5. 7月 2011, 12:29:16
Darles Chickens 
件名: Re:
Purple: lol...as the saying goes: "you missed a good opportunity to be quiet". As we all know, km gang had a reputation (how can I say this in a soft way?...) at least questionable. Or maybe praiseworthy for those who only seek win, regardeless the means to achieve it...For me, using a program is always regrettable and shows lack of principles.

5. 7月 2011, 01:03:56
Purple 
件名: Re:
Stardust: Program vs Program ends in draws 99 out of 100 times.

5. 7月 2011, 00:14:49
Stardust 
件名: Re:
Purple: The KM members who beat those programs did so because they were using those programs

4. 7月 2011, 23:55:55
Purple 
件名: Re:
Darles Chickens: I had KM members who regularly beat programs. They were that good.

4. 7月 2011, 16:03:24
Darles Chickens 
Darles Chickens (12. 7月 2011, 12:48:06)に変更されました。

I stopped playing regular checkers after finding that some of my opponents were using programs such as CakeManchester or Chinook to make their moves. So, I downloaded Cake Manchester, from Martin Fierz's homepage and now, when I want to play a good game, I do it against my machine. What I found a few months ago, was that Martin also developed a suicidal version for his Cake (here known as anti-checkers). I downloaded it too, and after playing some games against it, I found very familiar moves from games I had with two or three opponents, specially from ItsYousTurn.com. I surely hope that people will reconsider the use of such programs in their moves, or there will be no interest at all to keep playing those games here, against real players, when in reality we're doing that against a machine...



By the way, the site to download those programs: http://www.fierz.ch/checkers.htm 


14. 1月 2011, 20:42:42
Purple 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple (14. 1月 2011, 20:44:46)に変更されました。
rod03801: Never really checked it out. Thanks

14. 1月 2011, 17:59:48
rod03801 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple: Well, we have had Stairs for years now. (Same general idea as ladders)

http://brainking.com/en/Stairs

14. 1月 2011, 14:21:59
Purple 
件名: Re: Top Players
rod03801: Do you think Fencer would reconsider setting up some ladders, maybe in chess, checkers and Backgammon to begin with? Goldtoken and It's Your Turn have them and anything they can do we can do better. Not so?

13. 1月 2011, 17:48:35
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple: Anyway, people are free to choose who they wanna play with. For several reasons. Time they use in a game, for example. Or for "friend affinities". Or even other reasons. I like to play against some good players because I trully believe they are "fair players" and I can always learn something with them. I believe they also like to play with me.

13. 1月 2011, 17:45:48
Gabriel Almeida 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple: I can understand Why... I wouldn't play against you either. Or against Pinchitos, or against Ustica...

13. 1月 2011, 17:23:26
Purple 
件名: Re: Top Players
Hexis: I am speaking in general. I can't rise in the rankings because no top player will play me.

13. 1月 2011, 17:12:35
Hexis 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple: Do you mean any particular players?

13. 1月 2011, 16:36:21
Purple 
件名: Re: Top Players
rod03801: Then once every 89 days you can play an EASY win from someone rated 50th and your rating will be unaffected. Too easy to manipulate and I would like stiffer penalties for inactive players.

13. 1月 2011, 15:44:20
rod03801 
件名: Re: Top Players
Purple: Actually, quite a while ago it was implemented that after 90 days of not completing a particular game, a rook will be hidden on the rankings. Once they complete another game, they "re-appear". You will notice on your own profile, that each game that has a "red" date, you do not have a ranking in.

For pawns, I believe it is 30 days.

13. 1月 2011, 14:45:42
Purple 
件名: Top Players
What is a person to do when the top player "does not wish to be invited to any games?" He will stay there forever with no one ever having any hope of overtaking him. Makes a maockery of the rankings.

28. 9月 2009, 14:12:58
AbigailII 
件名: Re: Question About the Rules of International Checkers
Helibore: I doubt that is the case. After all, if you make a mistake, and the stones are quickly removed the situation is the same. Furthermore, in any serious competition, players must write down their moves anyway.

No, the reason is that you are not allowed to jump a stone twice. If you make a multiple capture using a queen, if you would remove the stones during the move, it may be that it appears the queen has a free path, instead of being blocked by an already taken stone.

While speaking on this subject, shortly after International and other national checker variants appeared, I asked Fencer to make it on the move confirmation visible which checkers had been taken in this move (for instance, by showing them with a blue border). He answered positively, but it still hasn't happened. :(

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
日時
オンライン友達
気に入り掲示板
同好会
今日のアドバイス
著作権 © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek.
上へ