Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Paard.
KotDB: Why don't you just turn them off? That's what I did. It's in the setting part. Or has this whole discussion been because Pawn members don't have the option? You certainly have pointed out a contradiction. They used to be something for the paying members to "enjoy" and now the smileys are being used to annoy the non-paying members. How'd this sea change come about? I see no reason for there to not be a setting to switch them on or off for every memeber.
Aangepast door plaintiger (2. juni 2006, 20:45:11)
KotDB: there is also the option of changing your mind and deciding you like them and think they're colorful and cute and fun. i did that a year or two ago and there's been one more thing i can enjoy - and one less thing that annoys me - in the world ever since.
and while we're on the subject...i think divvying the smilies up on to pages is probably a good idea...it'll be more useful once i memorize which ones are on which page...but i do miss the ability to click anywhere outside the smiley panel to dismiss it. we couldn't possibly get that ability back, could we?
plaintiger: I thought that too first. But now I like having the smiley window opened and placed outside the editor text field (you can move the new window). So it's out of my way, but I can use the smileys while I'm typing.
gogul: I didn't want to make my script public before going over it a few more times. I have a link to its current version at the user scripting fellowship.
BIG BAD WOLF:I agree ,but at the same time i know people have print outs of the random choice picks,they try and hide it, but once they hit 2 they know exactly where the other three are,but play stupid until it comes down to were they have to hit and always know exactly where to move.
CRY ME A RIVER: better yet, maybe there should be a limit. Tournaments with less than 10 or 20 players dont count for tourney wins. Lets face it, having a tourney win in a 4 person tournament is kind of silly. Maybe some egomaniacs like it but it is pointless and the wins mean nothing
if there is a way - can someone tell me.... if there isnt - could there be?
When a message is edited on a discussion board, could an option be selected or checked by the big boss or moderator that would show it on your board list as a new message?
rod03801: why would you laugh at that suggestion? It was a real question and not intended to be a setup for mockery. You are also a moderator so maybe you should moderate your own comment
BIG BAD WOLF: thanks. I find the pictures can make it hard to follow a thread by taking up room. So many times now I look on a board, General Chat for example, and I try and read the newst 20 messages and it looks like a lot but it ends up being filled with single messages such as "lol" only etc and as it turns out, all 20 messages are often pointless.
SafariGal: At present the only way to remove smileys and pictures is to use grease monkey and write a script to do it. As a paying member you have the option to turn off smileys.
I do think there should be a minimal bandwidth option available to all players. This would allow people to turn off all pictures and save bandwidth for both BrainKing and for those people that turn this feature on.
I would like this because when I am on a wrieless connection I don't always get a very fast connection to this site.
SafariGal: Hard for me to say I have been programing for most of my life(18 years). You would need to learn Java. We(mostly hex kid) have been developing a script for users of Brainking to do a lot of things in user scripting but only paying members can get into fellowships. Not sure if hexkid wants to make this script available for all.
When playing a game against an unrated player, could the ratings be changed so only the unrated player's is modified?
I accepted a challenge from an unrated player (his first game on BK). He turned out to be quite good and I lost. I figured my rating might go down, but I didn't expect it to go down 56 points. It makes me want to NOT play against unrated players...
Summertop: The ratings in all games are very hard to understand.You try to get a game up,then bang 1 game and its over,very frustrating you don't no who to play and who not to.
The point is...If they have a rating, you know their skill level and you can make the decision to play them. You might play a better player to gain skills. You might play a weaker player to gain rating points.
When you play an unrated player, you don't know what type of player they are. But you will have your rating adjusted based on a "Weak" player. So, in this case the unrated player is a VERY good player, yet the rating system "thinks" they are a weak player. So, my ratings took a hard hit.
Because of this, many strong rated players won't play rated games against unrated players. Why would they take the risk?
In answer to your question, pauloaguia, Since they ARE rated I know before starting the game, what I am getting into.
CRY ME A RIVER: . . . pauloaguia: IT IS OUR RIGHT TO DO SO
Yes of course! I'm with you! I heavily compain to Fencer that allows unrated players to play games versus rated players!!!!!!! Fencer you should put an end to this! Don't ever allow unrated players to play with rated ones. Even if both sides want this..... Consider this as a feature request by me. It's my right to ask this.... Also another very useful thing would be if unrated players would not be able to play at Mondays! It's my right to ask this and as a paying member i do....
Also a tip to CRY ME A RIVER and Summertop: If you don't want to play with an unrated player you have the option to do it and don't play..... If you want to play with an unrated player you have the option to do it and play.....
Pythagoras: It wasn't so long ago that I was unrated at all variants here--it's so recent that I still remember it :) It would have been a shame if all rated players would have refused to play me for that reason (as it would have been their right to do). I'm thankful to all of those who took the risk and to those who shed some rating points. On my part, I've never blocked unrated opponents from my game invitations. I remember where I came from!
wetware: Unfortunately, Pythagoras's sarcasm probably came off a little too straight-laced. That's one of the main problems with typed sarcasm--there's a very fine line separating it and something that sounds real. Although, I think his final suggestion of non-rated players not being able to play on Mondays kinda put it over the top.
jurek: I understood the sarcasm, and didn't mean to take issue with that insightful message. My mistake was to reply only to Pythagoras, although there were a number of distinct and thoughtful postings on that subject.
jurek: It was pretty obviously sarcasm. After all if we only let unrated players play each other they would become rated, but the ratings would be meaningless.
when unrated players play rated players, The unrated players will get a more accurate rating. Unfortunately, the rated player may take a hit for playing. I just think the rating formula should be updated so rated player's don't get adjusted if the opponent isn't rated.
(verberg) Zin in een vlugge partij die gegarandeerd binnen 2 uur klaar is? Zet dan in de gewenste spelsoort een nieuwe partij op en stel de tijd in op 0 dagen / 1 uur, de extra tijd op 0 dagen / 0 uur en de limiet op 0 dagen / 1 uur. (TeamBundy) (laat alle tips zien)