Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Berichten per pagina:
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Pion.
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

<< <   15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24   > >>
23. mei 2005, 05:48:28
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re:
CindyInTN: interesting story, but wrong board. Chess variants (10x8) is next door ;-)

23. mei 2005, 03:06:26
CindyInTN 
Last weekend there was a Gothic Chess tournament at the University of Tennessee. I had heard about it on the radio and in the paper and it's only 40 minutes from my house, so I drove by to have a look. Nicely organized event with lots of friendly people playing Gothic Chess (i'd say 100 or more). I did catch a glimpse of Ed Trice walking around playing what people were telling me was a "simul". There were 12 people playing Gothic Chess against him at the same time and he won all of the games. Quite a cutie too if I must say so!! I am not the biggest chess fan, but I think you all have some strange sort of jealous thing going on. Lighten up!

22. mei 2005, 23:55:36
ughaibu 
Onderwerp: Alex
Go here http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=82147 scroll down and you'll find a link to your game.

22. mei 2005, 23:45:25
Alex 
Onderwerp: Re:
ughaibu: I can´t find this game.

22. mei 2005, 23:31:56
Kili 
I suppose he is already married.

22. mei 2005, 23:31:18
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re ughaibu:
Aangepast door danoschek (22. mei 2005, 23:33:19)
last time he prevailed as we know ... his lost game vs caissus vanished under
mysterious circumstances not only from the backup after a server crash, but also
from the why so bad memory of that hopelessly busted representant of infidelity ... ~*~

22. mei 2005, 23:27:35
ughaibu 
Onderwerp: Matarilevich
But will I still be married by the time that game finishes?

22. mei 2005, 23:23:47
Kili 
Aangepast door Kili (22. mei 2005, 23:28:53)
I bet you a coffe that Alex will win this game against Ed Trice :)

22. mei 2005, 23:15:21
ughaibu 
The game with Trice? Of course it's a joke. I'm publishing that game at http://www.chessgames.com/index.html do as you like.

22. mei 2005, 23:15:06
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: Alex:
Aangepast door danoschek (22. mei 2005, 23:16:00)
if some of the really pity occurances here would
be marked as joke after all, many of their naturally
misleading self-defintions could indeed be funny yet. ~*~

22. mei 2005, 23:10:18
Alex 
I not understand. This is joke?

22. mei 2005, 23:05:18
ughaibu 
Onderwerp: Alex
Why not resign the game?

22. mei 2005, 23:04:11
Alex 
But it´s no my lapse!

22. mei 2005, 22:59:17
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re:
Alex: nobody will tell it you ... you will have to check it out yourself ... come on! or is it too difficult? ;-)

22. mei 2005, 22:57:37
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: why no comment
Aangepast door danoschek (22. mei 2005, 23:03:50)
Alex: well I repeat it slowly for you:
no I won't comment - the game is still in progress and only cheaters or less serious
players would interfer now apart of technical statements. - As soon as you have won
. ~*~ . it though, respectively were bored to death by that staller/spammer, I shall have my say.

22. mei 2005, 22:57:06
Alex 
Good, but tell me.I have chance to win?

22. mei 2005, 22:49:26
ughaibu 
Onderwerp: Alex
I am a part of this game playing community as are you and Trice, our behaviour reflects upon each other.

22. mei 2005, 22:48:00
Alex 
I´m not understand why nobody no comment this game?

22. mei 2005, 22:44:39
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re:
ughaibu: no I won't comment - the game is still in progress.
as we know only pertinent cheaters would offer their services at analysis
during a running game to sabotate serious players on gameservers ... ~*~

22. mei 2005, 22:25:40
Alex 
Onderwerp: Re: Alex
ughaibu: Muzio gambit 49 move.

22. mei 2005, 22:20:04
ughaibu 
Onderwerp: Alex
Which one?

22. mei 2005, 22:10:02
Alex 
Onderwerp: ughaibu
Do you think, game between me and EdTrice will be draw?

22. mei 2005, 22:00:11
ughaibu 
Okay. Chess players have to suffer draws in any case.

22. mei 2005, 21:58:03
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re:
ughaibu: The game Trice-Alex does not affect that what I wrote when I offer a draw.
Well, in the game Trice-Alex a draw offer all three moves wuould be strange enough, yes ... but this can not be prohibited in my opinion. draw offer every move should be only prohibited.
but maybe worth to look at: a checkbox such as "i do not accept draw offers" ...

22. mei 2005, 21:51:38
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re:
ughaibu: when i offer a draw, then it i do it because
a) i mean the position is in my opinion equal and
a1) the tournament can be done with the draw (depends on my rank)
a2) i am playing against a strong player and it is such as a "leading question" ... just to know a little bit more what the opponent want ;-)
b) i am in a better position bt in the tournament/match this is enough

22. mei 2005, 21:40:07
ughaibu 
Generally it's bad manners to offer a draw in an inferior position, in effect this means that if a draw offer is refused the opponent thinks that their position is better, ie no consecutive draw offers by either player.

22. mei 2005, 21:37:52
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
danoschek: in my opinion 10 moves are too long - maybe 3-5 is worth to look at ...

22. mei 2005, 21:34:15
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
chessmec: not a bad idea either ... I would suggest TEN moves distance though. ~*~

22. mei 2005, 21:32:56
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
danoschek: that is worth to look at ... draw offering privileg alternating between the players, but what about a simple draw offer privilege only two moves after then you offered a draw?

22. mei 2005, 21:31:00
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re:
ughaibu: it would be sufficient to make the
privilege of offering draw alternating between the players. ~*~

22. mei 2005, 21:28:43
ughaibu 
How about deducting 50BK for each draw offer?

22. mei 2005, 21:24:41
votacommunista 
Onderwerp: Re: to all serious players
danoschek: Maybe some people do not understand that perpetual-draw-offers are for chessplayers not only unsportsmenlike ... against the whole game.
i think the experienced chess players here know the worth of a draw-offer, often done as a leading question, but never perpetual.
altough we are playing here "virtual" draw offers are useful for psychological playing here too ... as I said: I do not like draw spammers (some from the first move in the game!)

22. mei 2005, 20:56:31
danoschek 
Onderwerp: to all serious players
Aangepast door danoschek (22. mei 2005, 21:09:32)
since on features request a self-appointed "preselector"-bully disgruntles all useful
suggestions, we could need some more sincer votes who clearly state their opinion
against notorious, perpetual-draw-offer spammers supposed to be encouraged there ... ~*~

22. mei 2005, 20:32:01
ughaibu 
I'm going to post a thematic chess tournament, winners will be those to first double rooks on the 7th, no draws. The tournament'll be entitled "blind pigs" and'll be co-dedicated to the global moderators and the cloak facility.

22. mei 2005, 16:08:50
pauloaguia 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: If you take a look there's more of us pawns then there is of them ;) So no need to feel "inadequate".

Good luck for your prized tournament

21. mei 2005, 21:33:10
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: you go uhhmm - candidate ... ... ~*~

21. mei 2005, 21:21:49
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
danoschek: good, I'm already fighting feelings of inadequacy looking at all these rooks and knights (and comparing that with my lowly pawn) LOL

21. mei 2005, 21:19:54
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: yes it is ... ~*~

21. mei 2005, 21:17:16
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re:
Chessmaster1000: so it is theoretically possible for someone to win membership (without having ever been a member before)?

21. mei 2005, 21:06:56
Chessmaster1000 
Just kidding as i said................
You don't have to pay anything.....!
Except if at the tournament notes there is a different statement. But that would be ridiculous and i haven't seen anything yet.......

21. mei 2005, 21:00:45
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re:
Chessmaster1000: can someone else verify this 30 Euro?

21. mei 2005, 12:00:08
Chessmaster1000 
Hey! Just kidding, i'm not a fool that paid these money..........

(I received a mail saying i'm an idiot that paid 30 Euro, because when you win you pay nothing and since free membership cost less than 30 Euro, what's the reason to participate if you are about to pay more than that you win? The person who sent it must not have a sense of humour or must be a complete idiot!----Sorry......)

20. mei 2005, 22:11:02
Chessmaster1000 
Onderwerp: Re: prize tournaments
ColonelCrockett:
30 Euro if you win.........

20. mei 2005, 22:08:09
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: prize tournaments
do the prize tournaments (where you play for "free membership" cost anything?

17. mei 2005, 21:56:58
danoschek 
Onderwerp: oh okay
Aangepast door danoschek (17. mei 2005, 21:57:42)
I cAn clarify: it was double-plus ...
conductor, a welcome suite for our new bk comrades please
............. ... ... ~*~

17. mei 2005, 21:53:57
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re: errr
danoschek: plz clarify this message, I'm not an expert in double-speak. :)

17. mei 2005, 21:49:30
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: errr
Aangepast door danoschek (17. mei 2005, 21:51:16)
ColonelCrockett: oh yes ... it was not me who mentioned any trouble - remember.
the sensible thing with some associations is they grow over a controllable size, we had
that here too: the KMs, after a while stats strike, there's always someone crossing lines ~*~

17. mei 2005, 21:45:26
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re: errr
danoschek: as I recall, you and I got along just fine . . . what do you mean by clattergang?

17. mei 2005, 21:44:25
ColonelCrockett 
Onderwerp: Re: errr
chessmec: IYT = itsyourturn.com

17. mei 2005, 21:42:09
danoschek 
Onderwerp: Re: errr
Aangepast door danoschek (17. mei 2005, 21:46:12)
ColonelCrockett: oh I see, your memory has still not improved ... I was
the guy who never was with some one unless in spirit, not like your clattergang ...
btw how are the nicer folks who try to avoid trouble, like tal for instance ? ~*~

<< <   15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24   > >>
Datum en tijd
Aanwezige vrienden
Favoriete Forums
Genootschappen
Tip van de dag
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
Terug naar boven