Yeah like you need to listen to (Air Supply) LMAO

I can feel the love in the air LMAO

Again BBW you make perfectly good sense to my knowledge,sounds great and perfect as usual,not enough people give you the credit you deserve for your intellegence and wisdom.Your friend Mike.:o)

There is an apparent "studder" in the second section when seeding the players.

Section 1 gets seed #1

Section 2 gets seed #2
Section 2 gets seed #3

Section 1 gets seed #4
Section 1 gets seed #5

then it alternates. It's a good system which promotes competition to the maximum.

It's a way to spread out the highest ranked players. I'll explain it this way which should make a little more since. (Example using 4 sections)

So first put the highest ranked player in section #1,
2nd highest in Section #2,
3rd highest in Section #3
4th highest in Section #4

At this point you start to go backwards.

5th highest in Section #4,
6th highest in Section #3,
7th highest in Section #2,
8th highest in Section #1,

... and again, in the other direction.

9th highest in Section #1
10th highest in Section #2
11th highest in Section #3
12th highest in Section #4
... and so on.

Hopefully that will make more since seeing it when it applies to more section. With only 2 sections, it does look a little strange.

ok, but seems to be a little bit strange to me.

First group:
highest ranked
4th highest
5th higest
8th highest

Second Group:
2nd highest ranked
3rd highest
6th highest
7th highest

Please tell me, how the groups was built in this torunament - following after the strength of the player not only i suppose.
Which rating will be used? Because when I calculate with the actual rating the rank the groups must be built in another way. So what is teh way to build the groups?
(I thought I will be in the group with Ed Trice but was a little bit disappointed when i saw that i am not in his group - but as i told i calculated after rating rank).
So what?

they will wait unstarted until enough teams sign up :o) I asked this one before

Fencer - for the 3 or so Team Tournament which do not have enough teams, what will happen to those?

I set up a Tourney for Fast Espionage. It will be a short one cause only 6 people can sign up which means only 3 people per section max. Try it out and lets have fun!

Fast Espionage Quickly

***edited the link***

Reminder to all there are two prize tournament for backgammon,with all games included,one for each fellowship and everyone is welcome needing more player in all games have a look and pick your preference so all games will have a tournament or as many as feasable.Thanks your friend Mike :o)

HOME needs the following number of players...

Jungle - 3
Cylinder chess - 3
Gothic chess - 2
Alquerque - 2

I was looking through the team tournaments, and I seen 3 tournaments which will not have enough teams to start.

Those tournaments of less-popular games are:

Gothic Chess

Cylinder Chess

Parachute Checkers

If you are able to play in team tournaments, and any of those games look interesting to you - Check with your fellowships to teams to join, or join a new fellowship looking for team members.

Here are a few fellowships that I know of that are looking for players for these tournaments:

HOME Fellowship - I know looking for both Cylinder Chess & Gothic Chess

Monkey Madhouse - Looking for players for all 3 games

The Zoo - Also looking for players for all 3 games.

If other fellowship are looking, please let us know. If you are a player, feel free to join. Hopefully we can get enough teams to start these tournaments!

But as Steve pointed out, it's already in motion

I think we can do without it since some ppl are misusing it

So that's what all the huffy is about LOL

LMAO

apparently timing out is an emergency ;)

How does the auto vacation know it's an emergency LOL.

ok.

It is the auto vacation that is for "emergencies" Sky... If it is not an emergency then one can use the vacations normally.

I didn't know vacation time was for emergency's.

Come on Ug....RU flurting with me again? :)
I miss our debates. No, really...
Sorry you had to agree with me.
I must have been bored, to be so repetative.

I doubt "most" people are "tired of listening to steve whine"... You always do that. You feel a certain way, and try to make it sound like a majority feels the same, even though you have no idea, LJ... There is NO reason for Stevie to be banned! (not this time anyways.. LOL!) :-P

No, because you would obviously not be onsite :o)

Well, if you are using auto-vacation and you end up not having to go, none of your games should "time out", and therefore no vacation days should be used.

vacation days up. Cause I may have to be gone with my daughter and for some reason I don't have to go, u say that is abuse?

Somehow I think it will be a no do it anyways

but who would keep the records though? Thats a lot of work for the players to do really

How would you know Ughaibu?

up your pimple purple head

Anyway LJ
This was only a heated discusion. Nothing more, two sides getting their opinions across.
Until you came on

I modified it to add flaming LMAO
I couldnt give two hoots if you are getting tired of me whinging. The only problem i have is I say what others think and dont say. So looks like its just me. But it isnt. Whereas the likes of you, you say what you think the boss man wants you to say. cant get much lower can you

and you were not flaming nor stirring?

Once more LJ shows his true self. nose covered in the brown stuff etc. Whats wrong?? you want rid of someone who shows you for what you are???

I see you signed on with both accounts LJ you should shut up and play both sets of games. ooopps sorry, you said its your wife momentarily didnt you before deleting the commenet LOL I guess your post below wont stay long either.

It is just not a right attitude. Once there is a feature which people do find useful from time to time, it should not be abolished just because some others abuse it. Such an attitude would lead, then, to a "tyranny of the abusers", because BK would be further developed with respect to preventing these from acting abusively and not with respect to helping us all to have a good gameplay.

Do you see my point ?

I dont think it is that tough to see... If you are away from the site, automatic vacation days to prevent time out is fine. there should be no limit to it, except for the amount of vacation time you have left. If you have logged into the site within 24 hours (or some specific amount of time) of a game being timed out, the Automatic vacation should not be turned on for you.

I think we all agree, it should not be used to add time to a game when a person is available to make a move.

I agree that auto vacation should not be allowed to be used on games if a person has signed into the account at any period , and even if it does kick in a maximum limit of 2 or 3 days should be allowed .

Thanks Loup :o)
The diference is BBW to set it manually means they have to go out of their way to do it.
Whereas its easy to sit back and let an auto thing kick in

but the thing is, even without auto vacation, that same person can hold up the tournament for over a month.

hear hear. Finishing the tournament is the fun part. If you time out for whatever reason then enter the next one. It's not the end of the world.