Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Czuch Chuckers: I didn't read all the discussion, but as a native english speaker with a relatively high level of education, it is true to say that NO country has a majority of users.
More importantly it IS true to say that the majority of users don't have a holiday on the 4th of July. This, I believe, is the point.
Pioneer54: I agree with most points. However, as with the real chess ratings, inactive players should be removed from the list. If they become active they go back.
AbigailII: I know it's not perfect. But actually with more games going you would have more chance to play quickly. I frequently don't have any games where it's my turn and am slower than I otherwise would be. Someone with 900 games going would never be in that situation.
Anyway, it's just an attempt to rank players by how quickly they will move in a given game. If you can think of another way to determine that I'm all ears.
AbigailII: The point is not how fast you are playing, but how many moves per game each day. So if you play more games, you will play fewer turns per day.
I may play 200 turns in a day, but because I play 20 games, that's 10 moves per game per day. If I played 200 games I'd average 1 move per game per day.
pauloaguia: Um, reloading the page takes a few seconds. Surely a 3 minute game would be aa good "Lightning version".
Anyway, the 2 hours max time would be good, working just like a real chess clock, but without the silly adding time when you move. I'm ok with adding 30 minutes per 40 moves or something.
I don't think one hour is a good idea. Much better would be 2 hours for the whole game or something like that. If the game length is unknown then I might fall asleep before the game is over.
Another reason why 3 minute limits are probably better.
Andersp: Actually it's only useful for players that play a few games. Those that play hundreds a once it's hard to keep up with and I don't find the last action feature useful for them at all.
chessmec: you are joking right? Goverments are building up databases on what games I play? No wonder they miss the important stuff. I notice you are not on cloak, so it must have been a joke.
plaintiger: That's right, because fencer is broadcasting everyone's address, telephone number, Social Security Numbers and bank account numbers. Better hide all that by going into cloak mode.
plaintiger: This was requested here by more than one person and implemented. of course you could just uncloak yourself whenever you need to spy, which can't be done in reverse.
playBunny: All I asked for was a definition other than "most recent thing the user did". I say that is the only possible interpretation and therefore it isn't ambiguous.
Emne: Re: invitations to only players with established BKR's
Summertop: As the tournament creator you could make it clear right now that established ratings only will be allowed. You can then boot people out of the tournament if they aren't complying.
AbigailII: Clearly cloak mode is not designed to protect your SSN, not to mention that probably more than half the people viewing this don't even have one.
Emne: Re: Perpetual draw offers should be prohibited
Caissus: It isn't always obvious that the draw was offered, I've missed it occasionally. If I think the game is a draw I will offer every turn until my opponent answers with some indication they saw it and declined.
rod03801: I've never seen WebTV, but I'd have to agree with Walter, if you can't see the whole page that's a bug in the browser I would think, let them know and maybe it will get fixed!
(hjem) Du kan benytte noen av de enklere HTMLkodene i meldingene dine. Hvis du er et betalende medlem kan du også bruke Rich Text Editor. (pauloaguia) (Vis alle tips)