 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Du kan ikke skrive meldinger i dette forumet. For å kunne skrive her må ha et Brain Pawn medlemskap eller høyere. Modus: Alle kan skrive
15. november 2006, 19:05:40 Scratch the 5-2, one of this timed losses was going to be his win. So closer to a 5-3 score. 15. november 2006, 18:54:47 I completed my blitz games with Grim Reaper. The final score says Kurnik is 7-2-0 in my favor. Though, 1 or 2 of his losses by running out of time were draws. So it probably around 5-2 with some draws. You can view all the games here: http://www.kurnik.org/intl/en/stat.phtml?gid=ch&uid=bk_grimreaper&sk=2 14. november 2006, 03:08:48 I won the match by forfeit. Grim Reaper is too scared. 9. november 2006, 10:53:01 I challenge Grim Reaper to a Blitz(3 Minutes timer for whole game) Chess Match of 12 games at Kurnik.org. 14. desember 2005, 10:29:50 Emne: Top 5 Players Ever Everyone's opinion on the top 5 players ever? Here is mine:
1. Capablanca 2. Kasparov 3. Fischer 4. Alekhine 5. Botvinik 27. oktober 2005, 05:24:17 Why are you so hostile over this matter, Pythagoras? O_o 26. oktober 2005, 14:45:10 Emne: Re: guidelines Beren the 32nd: Yes I think BK should give everyone guidelines. It is obvious no one wants to play against a chess engine without notice. 26. oktober 2005, 14:42:51 I did not accuse anyone of using resources to find opening moves.
I clearly accused people of using CCOMPUTER CHESS PROGRAMS. If people did research the openings in a book or another resource, don't you think they would know the opening name after playing it 15 moves deep? You misunderstood everything Pythagoras. 26. oktober 2005, 14:39:12 It was clear that I was accusing players of using computer assistance, nothing else. I'm sorry if you don't understand. 26. oktober 2005, 13:24:22 I just find it odd that a player can go 10-15 moves deep into published play and not know the name of the line when I ask them. I've studied hard to memorize openings and their published play along with the names and it makes me sick that someone can know 15 published moves to benkos without one inch of study. I know that with this style of online gaming that the top 1-3 players are legit masters that can beat a program within the time limit given. 26. oktober 2005, 02:31:08 I did not mean ALL of them but some :) I won't say names. 25. oktober 2005, 10:02:06 It is hard to play brainking chess because of all the higher rated players using program for assistance. |
Dato og tid
Innloggede venner
Favorittforum
Laug
Dagens tips
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Tilbake til toppen |