Utilizador: Password:
Registo de novo utilizador
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensagens por página:
Lista de Fóruns
Não pode escrever mensagens neste fórum. O nível mínimo de inscrição para o fazer neste fórum é Nível Cavaleiro.
Modo de acesso: Qualquer um pode escrever
Procurar nas mensagens:  

<< <   366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375   > >>
15. Dezembro 2005, 15:36:04
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
tonyh: Yes.

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:32:03
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
Fencer: If a member has unused vacations days at 31 December, what happens to them? Do they just disappear?

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:29:02
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
tonyh: No. The request must be logical, must have a sense. Changing the vacation policy, as you propose, seems illogical to me, that's why I won't do it.

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:28:49
playBunny 
lovelysharon: If the incremental allotment gave the same number of days and you started with a decent quotient then you would certainly be able to do your "accumulation of days between". If you couldn't then you'd have to run out of days under the current system as well, because they both provide the same amount.

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:20:19
nabla 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
tonyh: Actually the current policy is strictly more generous than the "running total" one (I mean, it just always gives you more flexibility).
Imagine that you get a job offer where you will get an annual salary at entrance, and then an annual salary each 1st of January, would you decline it because you are afraid that you could spend all your money in January ? Well, maybe your answer will be yes, but mine won't :-)

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:16:35
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
Fencer: What, pray, is a good argument to convince you?

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:09:21
lovelysharon 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
tonyh: other sites can have really bad policies too... at iyt I timed out everytime I traveled.. that is why I am no longer a paying member there and joined here..

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:06:03
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
tonyh: "Other sites do it thia way" is a bad argument to convince me. Nothing will be changed.

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:03:43
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
Hrqls: I think we could have 30 days as a start off. Then we deduct vacation days and add on 2 or 3 days a month until we get back to 30 days maximum. That way, we could always have enough days for vacations.
Other sites do it thia way.

15. Dezembro 2005, 15:00:42
lovelysharon 
I currently go away to visit my kids in dec/jan... feb vacation is with a girlfrind.. back to visit the kids in april for my grandsons birthday.. I take a small vacation in the summer for myself .. now with new grandbaby there's another birthday in october for a visit then.. and back again in dec for holidays.. do you think i can accumulate enough days in between??.. last summer i had an off chance of a holiday in Hawaii with 4 days notice.. I jumped on that.. lol.. .. I say keep the allotment the way it is..

15. Dezembro 2005, 14:53:26
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
lovelysharon: Yes, I realised when Hrqls posted that you were continuing the topic.

30 days in January or 3 days per month would surely be a choice for each user to decide. But even if 3 days per month were forced upon people there shouldn't be the problem that you fear, except right at the start of membership. If you take a long holiday in February but none in September through January then you'd easily have built up enough to take 10 days off. It's only in the first year that there would be any problem. If I were implementing that system then I'd avoid even that hardship by starting people off with 10 or 15 days and then adding the 3 days per month thereafter. But giving the choice is better.

15. Dezembro 2005, 14:13:36
lovelysharon 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
Vikings: as far as the self discipline.. I get 5 weeks vacation each year from work... I'm not sitting home all that time worrying about my backgammon games... I go when the mood strikes... lol..most time it's to my son's house where i do have access but rather spend time with my grandson..

the major reason I joined this site was the current vacation policy.. I just have to remember to keep that auto vacation turned off... lost too many days to it this year..

15. Dezembro 2005, 14:06:17
lovelysharon 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
playBunny: there was more than one person talking on this subject and I guess I was asking the group ... hypotheically if the vacation time was alloted a few days per month one person could not take a two week vacation in early months of the year...

15. Dezembro 2005, 13:32:10
Jason 
blah

15. Dezembro 2005, 12:48:31
Hrqls 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
playBunny: nah .. you understood her perfectly .. i think .. i understood her the same way :)

user options are always my favo(u)rite :)

15. Dezembro 2005, 11:59:03
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
Hrqls: Ah, I see I actually misunderstood. Lovelysharon's query wasn't addressed to anyone so I thought it was a separate issue.

It makes sense, then, that lump sum vs monthly paycheck should be a user option.

15. Dezembro 2005, 11:41:29
Hrqls 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
playBunny: *nod* thats what she is asking .. and if she isnt .. then i am asking the same thing :)

the frist week of 2006 i will on vacation (probably athens), so i will need 5 days for that

then in march i will be away for another week (austria) so i will need 5 or 6 more days then

that wont work out with just a few days per month

i like the 30 days at once and try to use them wisely (in combination with weekend days :))

15. Dezembro 2005, 07:23:35
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
Vikings: Because, Vikings, I take plenty of holidays where there aren't always Internt cafes; what's this 'discipline' nonsense?

15. Dezembro 2005, 02:20:16
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days mismatch.
lovelysharon: You mean a real vacation for two weeks and 3 BrainKing days left? They'll lose a vacation day for the first match that would time out on a given day. That match gets extended. The rest of the matches that would time out on that same day get extended too and are covered by the same vacation day. This can happen three times after which the vacation days are used up and the matches time out for real.

Is that what you were asking?

15. Dezembro 2005, 01:38:47
lovelysharon 
what would happen if someone were to take a two week vacation in February with only 3 vacation days??.

15. Dezembro 2005, 00:33:53
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
Vikings: lol. Yeah, self-discipline's the answer. Now what shop sells that stuff 'cos I need some in about 100 areas of my life...

15. Dezembro 2005, 00:21:16
Vikings 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
tonyh: why not just use a little dicipline and not waste them early in the year, that way if there is an emergency you are covered for longer

15. Dezembro 2005, 00:16:22
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
playBunny: Thank you for explaining this so perfectly; as you say, BK could allocate 2 days in one month and 3 days in the next.
What do you think of this so far, Fencer?

14. Dezembro 2005, 23:39:33
ScarletRose 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
playBunny: oh.. yes that would be nice.. I could see that way..

14. Dezembro 2005, 23:31:27
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Vacation days
ScarletRose: Tony's not asking for more vacation days. He's saying that rather than give a lump sum of in January, he'd prefer to have 3 days added at the end of each month.

That would mean 6 additional days for a Rook because twelve 3s is 36, but it could be done as 3 days in Jan, 2 days in Feb, 3 in Mar, etc. This would give no extra days but still spreads out the allocation.

For Knights it would be 2 per month giving 24 for the year or 2 days for Jan and Feb, 1 day for Mar, 2 for Apr, May, etc. giving the current 20.

14. Dezembro 2005, 16:54:32
ScarletRose 
Assunto: Re:
furbster: I have 23

14. Dezembro 2005, 16:50:36
furbster 
I agree i've still got all 30 left.

14. Dezembro 2005, 16:49:09
ScarletRose 
Assunto: Re: Vacations
tonyh: Bud.. I would hope to heck he didn't give us that much vacation time, we have plenty..

Some peeps yes.. they need the vacation time.. while other abuse it..

For instance.. someone who starts up lots of games and tournaments.. then goes over to a new account .. and never intends on coming back to the account the games were started on.. if they have a full lot of vacation days.. and they game allows them 14 days to make a move.. it takes at least 45 days to time out when they have full vacation days.. which not only holds up the games and tourneys.. it also restricts those who are playing the game that don't have a membership to have to sit and wait it out.. or suffer the point loss by resigning the game.

even those who start over 200 games and can't keep up with the games..

We get plenty of Vacation Days!

14. Dezembro 2005, 16:35:49
tonyh 
Assunto: Re: Vacations
Modificado por tonyh (14. Dezembro 2005, 16:37:16)
Fencer: the 30 days vacation time is renewed at the end of each month (you might have to give us 36 days!! or add on 2 1/2 days).
that way, we need never worry about running out of vacation time towards the end 0f the year. For example, I have 0 days left but will get 30 days in January, when I don't really need them then.

14. Dezembro 2005, 14:10:46
Radiant2008 :-) 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Fencer: LL

14. Dezembro 2005, 14:09:46
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Radiant Aunt: Because it is my rule.

14. Dezembro 2005, 14:07:33
Radiant2008 :-) 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Fencer: I always wondered why is it not possible to take vacation days to the new year?

14. Dezembro 2005, 12:35:17
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: Vacations
tonyh: What is a rolling number?

14. Dezembro 2005, 12:25:27
tonyh 
Assunto: Vacations
Would it be possible to have a rolling number of vacations days; I find that approaching Xmas, I've nearly used up all mine.

14. Dezembro 2005, 11:44:41
harley 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Luke Skywalker: Sorry, I was thinking of the knight memberships that get 20 days per year.

14. Dezembro 2005, 11:40:05
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Luke Skywalker: No, it's not possible.

14. Dezembro 2005, 11:28:23
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
harley: As a pawn I only have 5. I haven't used them this year and I'd like to set them now for the christmas holidays, but if it was possible to carry them over I'd rather do that to get 10 days next year.

14. Dezembro 2005, 11:22:45
harley 
Assunto: Re: vacation days
Luke Skywalker: No, on January 1st they start over so you would have 20 again, regardless of how many you have left now.

14. Dezembro 2005, 11:06:20
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: vacation days
can unused vacation days be transferred to the next year?

12. Dezembro 2005, 12:05:12
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Fencer: what about donut froglet then? (where's the donut smiley?)

12. Dezembro 2005, 11:55:50
LuckyCat9 
There's no hope for the lot :P

12. Dezembro 2005, 11:54:51
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Pythagoras: or by using the right proxomitron filter

12. Dezembro 2005, 11:50:07
Chicago Bulls 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Modificado por Chicago Bulls (12. Dezembro 2005, 11:50:28)
wellywales: If he uses his eyes only. If he uses his brain too: http://brainking.com/images/smileys/4.gif.

12. Dezembro 2005, 11:05:54
WellyWales 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Fencer: He is a pawn, he cannot see your winking eye

12. Dezembro 2005, 11:04:11
playBunny 
Assunto: Re: Sphere froglet
Luke Skywalker: If you call it Taurus Froglet people will be asking where the bulls are. ;-)

12. Dezembro 2005, 09:11:21
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Luke Skywalker: I don't want to have it mathematically correct. There are many people who don't know what a torus is but everyone knows a sphere.

12. Dezembro 2005, 09:09:51
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Fencer: of course you are free to call it anything you like, but I thought you would want to be mathematically correct.

12. Dezembro 2005, 08:42:25
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: sphere froglet
Luke Skywalker: No, I like sphere.

12. Dezembro 2005, 08:41:31
Luke Skywalker 
Assunto: sphere froglet
should be called torus froglet

12. Dezembro 2005, 07:19:11
Fencer 
Assunto: Re: bug?
plaintiger: This is a side effect of one recent bugfix and affects only older messages.

<< <   366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375   > >>
Data e hora
Amigos online
Fóruns favoritos
Clubes
Dica do dia
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, todos os direitos reservados.
Voltar para o topo